|
|
Author
|
Topic: Temperature conversions
|
John Wilson
Film God
Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 07-08-2001 02:35 AM
In the chat room today, I stated that it was 13 degrees here in Sydney and when asked what that was in Farenheit, I thought that it was about 40 to 45 degrees. We all agreed we needed Evans there to do the math but I've found something so we don't need to bother Evans with such trivialities... Convert Temperatures Here BTW...13 celcius is 53.6 farenheit John ------------------ "If you think THIS is fantastic...wait until you see the full effect with the HIMP!" - Chief Inspector Clouseau.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 07-08-2001 06:35 PM
It's not rocket science folks. The main thing people have trouble remembering is the order in which to apply the 5/9 thing and the 32 thing.To convert from Celsius to Fahrenheit: First scale the measurement by multiplying by 9/5 Second, adjust the base of the measurement by adding 32. To convert from Fahrenheit to Celsius, do the reverse: First, adjust the base of the measurement by subtracting 32. Second, scale the measurement by multiplying by 5/9. That is, f = 9/5 * c + 32 and c = (f - 32) * 5/9 Kelvin is the same scale as Celsius except that the base is 273.15 different. To convert to Kelvin, first convert to Celsius if not already Celsius, then add 273.15. The Kelvin scale is based on absolute zero, the temperature representing complete absence of heat. If you have a Kelvin measurement, subtract 273.15 and you'll have Celsius. Another way to remember conversion between Fahrenheit and Celsius is just remember the two most important temperatures related to water: Water Freezes: 32 F, 0 C Water boils: 212 F, 100 C If you just remember those, you can convert any temperature by simple linear interpolation without remembering the "rules" I gave above. ------------------ Evans A Criswell Huntsville-Decatur Movie Theatre Info Site
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 07-08-2001 10:43 PM
The Kelvin scale is a moving target though... pick up a variety of text and sure it will have the 273 figure but the last two after the decimal can be all over the place...have the scientific community really agreed upon 273.15?As to F vs C...I always remember the conversion based on freezing water...as Evan stated ... most people know 0C = 32F = feezing water. Most people also know that C tends to be lower than F for tempertures above freezing...with this in mind...how can you get from 32 to to 0? knowing that there is an addition or subtraction of 32 plus that 5/9 or 9/5ths thingy in there? Well 32-32 = 0 and anthing multiplied by 0 = 0...so to go from F to C one must first subtract 32....Also since F is higher above freezing we must somehow make C smaller....5/9 is a fraction less than 1 so that will do it...therefore to go from F to C one must take C subtract 32 and multiply by 5/9 Going the other way is a bit harder to remember if you aren't into doing math since when the add 32 part comes in can be confusing. If you remember the above part...simply follow the steps in reverse...multiply C by 9/5 and add 32 at the end. Again, use feezing as your check...0 x 9/5 = 0....add 32 and yup 32F = 0C Steve ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God
Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 07-08-2001 10:59 PM
13 Deg. Celsius would be 10.5 Deg. Reaumur.When everybody started talking about esoteric temperature conversions I was going to say, "Kelvin" but somebody beat me to it. The only other scale that I could think of was this... Reaumur Scale
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Jerry Chase
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1068
From: Margate, FL, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 07-09-2001 10:44 AM
Temperatures are fine for engineers and scientists measuring chemical reactions, but I prefer analog thermometers, since people have their own internal thermostats.Working from hot to cold: Honey! Look outside! The damn lake is boiling! Hotter than F---ing Hell out there. Hot enough to fry eggs. Like an oven. Too hot to work. T-shirt weather. Warm. Comfortable. Sweater weather. Cool. Nippy. Chilly. Cold. Damn cold. Too damn cold. Colder 'n Hell. Colder'n a witches tit. The damn dog is stuck to the fire hydrant again. Don't touch grandma when she comes inside. She might shatter. Feel free to add other temperatures.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Tao Yue
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 209
From: Princeton, NJ
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 07-10-2001 08:34 AM
To answer Steve's question, the scientific community has indeed decided on 273.15 as the offset for Kelvin temperatures. However, this is not entirely accurate, since Kelvin is defined in terms of the triple point of water (the point on a phase diagram where the curves all intersect -- there, water can exist as a solid, liquid, AND gas simultaneously). That happens to be at 0.01 degrees Celsius (I forget what pressure is required). One Kelvin is defined as 1/273.16 of that temperature, which makes 0 degrees Celsius 273.15.See: http://www.malibutelecom.fi/yucca/SI/kelvin.html Of course, if we suddenly find that our measurement of the triple point of water is incorrect this all goes out the window. But that's why measurement units are constantly redefined. The meter has seen at least five definitions: in terms of the distance between Barcelona and Dunkirk, the distance between the north pole and the equator, the distance between two scratches on a platinum-iridium bar, a certain wavelength in the spectrum of Krypton, and, finally, the speed of light. The meter itself hasn't changed -- but the things that it is based upon have kept getting more accurate. ------------------ Tao Yue MIT '04: Course VI-2, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Projectionist, MIT Lecture Series Committee
| IP: Logged
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God
Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 07-10-2001 11:25 AM
Matthew:The link provided by John Wilson is a very fast on-line calculator: http://www.lawrencegoetz.com/programs/temp.htm Evans Criswell's formulae are also exact and correct: That is, f = 9/5 * c + 32 and c = (f - 32) * 5/9 Use either method to convert. BTW, another tidbit to remember is that body temperature 98.6 F = 37.0 Celsius. ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!
Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000
|
posted 07-10-2001 01:12 PM
Here's another algorithm I picked up during my professional piloting years--used it to convert temps from C to F for the pax (self-loading cargo) announcements. It is simple enough to do in your head and has an error strip of only a degree or so (good enough to fly the airplane with):1. Double the temp (DegC) 2. Subtract 10% 3. Add 32 Examples: 15 DecC ==> 15 x 2 = 30 30 - 3 = 27 27 + 32 = 59 DegF Works backwards too (F to C)! Still recovering from Anime Expo 2001... Paul Temporarily Unemployed Mercenary Projectionist "When the money runs out, so does I."
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|