|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Toyota or toy Yoda?
|
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator
Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 07-28-2001 12:27 PM
That would've been funny if about 2 minutes later the manager put a set of car keys in her hands, but that's just wrong!In case this link goes bad, here is the text from the www.sptimes.com website: Dream car is a ‘toy Yoda’ A Hooters waitress says a promised Toyota prize turned out to be a green subcompact - Yoda. Jodee Berry won a drawing at the Hooters in Panama City Beach, where she used to work. She says she was blindfolded and led to the parking lot. When the blindfold came off, she was looking at Yoda.
©Associated Press
© St. Petersburg Times, published July 28, 2001 PANAMA CITY, Fla. -- Oh, what a feeling. Toy Yoda!
A former Hooters waitress has sued the restaurant where she worked, saying she was promised a new Toyota for winning a beer sales contest. Instead she won a new toy Yoda -- the little green Jedi master from Star Wars. Jodee Berry, 26, then a waitress at the Hooters in Panama City Beach, won a contest to see who could sell the most beer in April. Manager Jared Blair told waitresses that the contest was a regional promotion, according to the lawsuit, and that the top 10 waitresses from each restaurant would be entered in a drawing. The person whose name was drawn would win a "new Toyota automobile," the lawsuit says Blair told them. In early May, Berry said, Blair told her she had won. "I couldn't believe that out of all the girls who were entered, I was the winner," Berry said. She was blindfolded and led to the restaurant parking lot. When the blindfold was removed, Berry wasn't looking at a new car, but a Yoda doll. Berry said she looked beyond the $40 toy, hoping to see the car driving around the corner. Blair, she said, was inside the restaurant laughing. But she wasn't. "A corporation can't lead their employees on like that," Berry said. "It's not good business ethics. They can't do that to people." Berry quit the restaurant a week later. She sued Gulf Coast Wings, owners of the restaurant, alleging breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation. She is seeking as compensation, the cost of a new Toyota -- the car. Her lawyer, Stephen West of Pensacola, said he was also looking at false advertising statutes. West said one other Hooters waitress verified Berry's story. Berry said Blair knowingly misled them through the course of the contest by telling the employees he didn't know what kind of Toyota it would be -- whether a car, truck or van. The suit contends that he also told them the winner would be responsible for the tax on the new automobile. West said those statements would go a long way toward defeating any defense argument that Berry misunderstood Blair. The restaurant regularly had contests where management would come through with the promised prize, said Berry, who worked at Hooters for about a year before quitting. Stuart Houston, a spokesman for the company, said it had not been served with the lawsuit yet and he would not comment. "
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Jerry Chase
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1068
From: Margate, FL, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 07-29-2001 11:01 AM
Our industry is not one that should throw stones. Do a web search on William Castle, the book "Glam Scam", the book "Fatal Subtraction: How Hollywood Really Does Business," or just ask around for war stories.In the Hollywood version of the story, the waitress would have been on a half-dozen casting couches, invested her tips and inheritance from her mother in a flop film, been made to "star" in a few nude pornos, and then been given the doll. BTW, To see how strange Hollywood is and how people relate to that strangeness, take a visit here and click on a few links.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Geoffrey Weiss
Film Handler
Posts: 68
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: May 2001
|
posted 07-29-2001 11:30 AM
I'm with Joe! Just because it happens all the time doesn't make it right. Hooters already exploits women. A friend who applied for a job there said that the manager told her there was one uniform size--small--and that it was "suggested" she not wear a bra to increase the number and amount of tips she received from male customers. If corporations--or individuals for that matter--insist on treating people like merchandise and fucking them at every opportunity, then I say sock it to them! I hope she gets a top-of-the-line Landcruiser and enough in punitive damages to retire! End of screed. Sorry, but this kind of thing really sticks in my craw.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000
|
posted 07-30-2001 09:20 PM
Oh, here we go with the "exploiting women" thing again. You know, for being soooo exploited, they sure do line up for applications, don't they. If they're so darned exploited, those two guys from Waverly, Iowa would not have had the employee base to turn their idea into such a successful chain. That's like saying they're exploiting those poor people on the island in "Survivor", making them eat bugs and rats. I personally love this story. People are so sue-happy these days. What ever happened to a good joke? It doesn't sound as if she invested anything personally into the hopes of getting this car. She probably didn't even get very embarassed, based on the nightly work uniform she's was used to wearing. She just saw the opportunity for dolar signs. Anyone who thinks this is a sick joke needs to lighten up and have a good laugh. And yes, if it happened to me, I WOULD laugh about it. That's what makes a joke funny for others, and sometimes you take one for the team so to speak all in the name of humor. In summary: Bravo Hooters! I love your wings (6 mile island if I'm feeling brave), and I love your waitresses! ------------------ "Asleep at the switch? I wasn't asleep, I was drunk!" - Homer Simpson
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God
Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 07-31-2001 06:41 PM
I say therer is a big difference between the radio station's scam and the Hooters scam.The radio station didn't say that there would be a car for the winner, only a "Toy-Yoda" Even if they said, "2000 Toy-Yoda", they still didn't say, "car". On the other hand, Hooters DID say, "car" or "automobile". They took the girl out to the parking lot, which is a place you would expect to find a car. They even bolstered the claim by saying that this was a regional promotion, in which many people would participate. Most people understand the concept that you can't get something for nothing, but when you throw in the "regional" thing you are tricking people into dropping their guard. Everybody knows that sales contests are really a gimmick to make money for the company. One could reasonably expect that the money to pay for the car would come out of the profits from the contest. To top it all off, the manager said that the winner would be responsible for paying the taxes. Again, there's another thing that a reasonable person might expect to happen when you win a contest. It's a standard disclaimer that's plastered all over the end credits of every game show on TV... "Winner is responsible for any and all taxes on prizes won." Again, they even said, "...taxes on the automobile." Maybe the girl could have checked out the story first. Often these kind of promotions are published in the company's newsletter. My company actually DOES have a contest where the winner gets a car. It's plastered all over the fron pages of our company's newsletters. However, Hooters used multiple tricks to make people let down their guard. Okay, so I buy in to the Hooters "dumb blonde" stereotypes. Why else do you think guys go there? For the food? Even somebody who ISN'T your stereotypical Hooters waitress (and, yes, there are many) might be easily tricked into thinking that there was a real Toyota CAR involved. Another thing! The radio station can get away with it... even IF they said (or implied) there was a car. The reason is simple... APRIL FOOL!!!
| IP: Logged
|
|
Paul Turner
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 115
From: Corvallis, OR, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 08-01-2001 12:29 AM
Recontextualize the story. What if this happened to a nurse at a children’s hospital? Your wife? Sister? Mother? Does that change how you feel about what happened to the “victim”? “Hooters” exploits women by objectifying them. The place ain’t called “In Depth Philosophical Discussions.” It’s called “Hooters,” or if ya wanna cut the shit, the place is called “Tits.” It exploits the idea that women are nothing more than what hangs in front of them. It’s a comfortable place for men who lack the depth to see women as more than their parts. And yes, these women choose to work there and it’s no mystery why. Men make more money than women. Take a man and woman of the same age, education, and abilities and you will see the woman will make form 25-33% less than the man (and they get to pay the same to live). So, if you have bills or kids or tuition to pay for, showing off the rack for a bunch of losers who can’t get close to attractive women any other way suddenly becomes an option. I raised three daughters and everyday had to deal with teachers, other parents, and a general American attitude that women are nothing more than breeding stock. How many fathers out there can relate to how it feels to have a middle-aged man checking out your teenage daughter (dressed for winter) while standing in line in Safeway with HER FATHER? It’s places like “Hooters” that contribute to that mind-set. It doesn’t mater if she was a serial killer or Mother Teresa, she was lied to, then laughed at. I guess she should just get back into the restaurant and shake her tits and forget about the whole thing, like a good little wench. Would you tell your mom to do that? Before you label me as some asshole liberal, let me say that I am an asshole liberal – who is 6’ 4”, wears a crew cut, happens to ride a Harley, will fight tooth and nail for the second amendment, and thinks tofu looks like something pulled out of the sink drain – and will do everything he can to see his daughters gets the same chances you do. It all comes down to your perception. Is this person a victim, or a Hooter’s waitress with no sense of humor? Replace the person suing Hooter’s with a loved-one and see how you feel.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|