Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Portable Mp3 Player

   
Author Topic: Portable Mp3 Player
Jeremy Spracklen
Film Handler

Posts: 39
From: Arlington, TX, USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-16-2002 03:11 PM      Profile for Jeremy Spracklen   Email Jeremy Spracklen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am looking to purchase a good portable MP3 player and am asking for some recommendations. It is important that this model is able to record straight from a stereo source. Also, are there any advantages to the removable memory cards over a large internal hard drive?

Thanks.


 |  IP: Logged

Andy Muirhead
Master Film Handler

Posts: 323
From: Galashiels, Scotland
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 03-16-2002 07:18 PM      Profile for Andy Muirhead   Email Andy Muirhead   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I dont know much about portable MP3 units, although what i do know is that if you are serious about portable audio, MiniDisc is the only solution quality-wise.

 |  IP: Logged

Josh Jones
Redhat

Posts: 1207
From: Plano, TX
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 03-16-2002 07:56 PM      Profile for Josh Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Josh Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll drop in another vote for the Minidisc option. I have heard the sharp machines are better than the sony, sony's being a little weak on the headphone volume and a little flimsy. so if you like it loud, get a sharp another thing is that a MD walkman will set you back about as much as a MP3 player, plus you have the option of recording and much longer playtime and quality. I dont know of any MP3 devices that can record.

Josh

 |  IP: Logged

David Favel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 764
From: Ashburton, New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-16-2002 08:32 PM      Profile for David Favel   Email David Favel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some of the new generation cell phones have a built in mp3 player attached.
Warning, they are quite ruthless on batteries.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-16-2002 08:52 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
MiniDisc kicks ass. I use my Sharp portable to listen to when I am wearing headphones. It sounds 10 to 20 times better than any Sony player I've ever heard. Otherwise I use my full size Kenwood or Sony dual CD/MD decks. I use a Sony portable for acquisition of sounds I need to record in remote locations. It does a great job at recording. The new MiniDisc units offer MDLP, so you can record several hours on a disc, though the quality gets lowered somewhat. But it still sounds billions of times better than most 128kbps MP3s! Ug.

I know the Apple iPod uses a 4 or 6 gig internal drive. It is much cheaper than memory cards, which are not cheap at all. If you have a Mac (who doesn't?) then the iPod would be the best way to go MP3 wise. Don't have a Mac? Just get MiniDisc. I have a Mac and still prefer MiniDisc.


 |  IP: Logged

Kelsey Black
Film Handler

Posts: 58
From: Pima, Arizona, USA
Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 03-17-2002 12:35 AM      Profile for Kelsey Black   Email Kelsey Black   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am the proud owner of a Creative Nomad Jukebox 20Gb. (overseas it's known as the DAP) It has a 20 Gb laptop hard drive (you can upgrade it to a 40, or whatever comes out that fits the 9.5mm space) it has headphone, and 2 line outs (you can configure them to be front/rear, parallel, or just one line out) and it has a line level stereo record at up to 16bit/48khz sampling rate uncompressed or you can record as MP3, but why would you want to if you have 20 gig?
Personally, if given the option, I prefer to go uncompressed, lossless as long as storage is not an isuue, and anything you do with a minidisc is going to be compressed with Sony's ATRAC scheme.
With this, you can playback WMA, MP3 or WAV formats, and it's flash upgradeable for other formats as Creative releases them (MP3pro and Ogg Vorbis have had quite some interest, I don't know where things are with the support as of writing...) And, you can use it to store any regular file, not just audio files, it's like having a 20Gig floppy with USB interface.
OTOH, (on the other hand) it does use batteries, AA NI-MH, but it also functions as a smart charger. a set of 4 fully charged 1800 mah batteries will go from full to dead in around 6 hours, so I keep 3 sets and the charger. It is heavier and bulkier than minidisc, or flash memory MP3 players, but it's only about the size of a portable CD player. And, as it comes from the factory and the EQ set flat, it lacks bass slightly from ~175 on down, but if you're both BOLD and DARING, you can change a small SMD capacitor inside it and get both more volume and nice bass without having to play with it's DSP EQ.
And the last thing i have to complain about it is that the one I have only has a USB interface, but if when I got mine I had known that Creative would be coming out with a new version that has firewire as well as USB ports, then I would have waited... but the thing still rocks.



 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-17-2002 01:25 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sounds like a cool unit (after user modification). I am too lazy to re-read your post, but does it have a microphone input jack? That would be essential. Also, all connections MUST be balanced. Nothing like huge ass XLR jacks everywhere. If it's not balanced audio, then it is not worth listening to. Balanced audio ROXORZZZZZ!!!!! The difference between balanced audio and unbalanced audio is similar to the difference between 65mm film and Fisher Price Pixelvision!

I don't know how the DAC/ADC's are in Creative stuff. But I have heard that Creative Soundblaster sound cards are a far cry from "audiophile" quality.


 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-17-2002 09:50 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Balanced lines are essential for long cable runs, but don't really do much for short runs.

For live recording, a portable DAT machine is probably the device of choice. It takes a fair amount of CPU horsepower to do MP3 compression in real time and Minidisc has potential reliability issues. Maybe I'm paranoid, but I tend to think of MD as being more of a "cart-machine-replacement" format rather than a true high-quality recording format. DAT has a number of advantages here, particularly the higher-end modes which allow off-the-tape monitoring (like a 3-head analog tape recorder). Sony makes (made?) a DAT walkman thing that sells (sold?) for about $500. A used Nagra 1/4" machine (the Rolex of tape recorders) would be another option to consider. The only thing that you lose here is random access capability, which is a big deal for casual listening, but not a big deal for recording.

I guess that the decision really comes down to the relative importance of recording and playback capabilities.

 |  IP: Logged

Kelsey Black
Film Handler

Posts: 58
From: Pima, Arizona, USA
Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 03-17-2002 10:28 PM      Profile for Kelsey Black   Email Kelsey Black   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, the Nomad Jukebox doesn't have balanced, or mic level inputs. just stereo line-level rec input via a 1/8" mini.
Personally, I haven't used it to record anything yet, I haven't done audio production since I worked at the local radio station almost a year ago, and I don't go to concerts very often, so I haven't had the chance to make any bootlegs with it either.
IMO, leaving the record input as line level is a good thing, as the preamps in most consumer equipment sucks. It's better to leave the preamp section to the end user so that they can set the cost/quality scales as they wish.
For more info on the Nomad Jukebox, go to the Nomad website

 |  IP: Logged

Jeff Skallan
Film Handler

Posts: 65
From: Littleton, CO, USA
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 03-18-2002 12:33 AM      Profile for Jeff Skallan   Email Jeff Skallan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One more vote for MiniDisc!

Sony claims that the magneto optical discs can be recorded over a million times without any degradation. The discs will not be affected by magnetic fields generated by TVs, speakers, etc. With the simplicity of dividing, merging and bouncing tracks around, it really makes things easy to organize music to your liking. MP3 players/recorders just seem silly to me compared to all the features MiniDisc provides. Sure there's a bit of audio compression, but I've yet to meet a person who can tell the difference in a blind test.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-18-2002 03:35 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with Jeff. Brad has gone on record saying that when SDDS is routed through a CP200 (bypassing the digital EQ) that it is his favorite sounding format. Know what the difference (other than the channel count) between SDDS and MiniDisc is? Nothing. Well sure, one is on film and has a back up track, etc etc etc. But both use the same ATRAC compression scheme. In fact MiniDisc has far fewer playback errors than any SDDS ever could no matter how well adjusted. Just the nature of the format. I am a total anal BASTARD and I think MiniDisc sounds GREAT!

I am curious about these "potential reliability issues" spoken of above. MiniDisc has always worked great. I've had a unit or two die from overuse, but the discs themselves have always been great. In fact a friend of mine in Pittsburgh record on a MiniDisc and send it back and forth, re-recording new stuff on it each time and then the other guy listens to it extensively. This has been going on for several years now using the same disc. We've recorded it in some very funky ways.... stereo, mono, mixed, super shuffled around and split up, etc... The disc always runs great without a hiccup. EXTREMELY durable. You simply cannot say the same about ANY tape format.


 |  IP: Logged

John Schulien
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 206
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 03-18-2002 01:21 PM      Profile for John Schulien   Email John Schulien   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would only recommend DAT for live field recording. Both the tapes and mechanisms are just too fragile for casual use.

I record a lot of live music, and standard practice is to make the field recording on DAT, then use a digital cable to upload the data to my PC, where I can edit it, insert track markers, and burn the music onto CDR. The DAT tape gets played once, then goes straight into the archive, where, assuming I don't damage or lose the CDR, it will probably never be played again.

Another upside to recording on DAT is that the tapes run 2 hours with no tape flip. In a live recording situation, you can tell the DAT tapers -- they're the ones sitting, with little smiles on their faces, watching the MD owners twitching their fingers, hoping that the band will end the song before the disc runs out, and pause long enough to change the cartridge.



 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-19-2002 07:51 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This is a non-issue for either format if you happen to have two decks hooked up to the same microphone. Some concerts last longer than 2 hours and DAT users will still have to flip sides/tapes in the middle of a song. With two identical recorders hooked up to the same microphone, you just start recording on the second deck when it looks like deck #1 is getting low. While deck 2 is recording you switch MD's or DAT's in the first deck. Then you happily trot home where you upload them to your MAC via digital connection and make pirate copies!


 |  IP: Logged

John Lasher
Master Film Handler

Posts: 493
From: Newark, DE
Registered: Aug 2001


 - posted 04-16-2002 06:53 PM      Profile for John Lasher   Author's Homepage   Email John Lasher   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yet another vote for MiniDisc, I toured with a singing group in summers of 2000/2001, we used choral-trax transferred to MD, sounded fan-bloody-tastic. MP3 is okay though, but only at the higher bitrates, or better yet variable bitrate (when done right, i.e. 2 pass automatic.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Olpin
Chop Chop!

Posts: 1852
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 04-18-2002 01:09 AM      Profile for Mike Olpin   Email Mike Olpin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
iLuv my iPod.

it plays AIFF & WAV too!

Now available in 5gb or 10gb conifgs.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.