|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: "FilthyFlicks" vs. "Clean-Flicks"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene
Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 09-26-2002 04:46 AM
The problem comes down to intellectual property rights. Can someone purchase a single copy of a movie, edit it any way he/she sees fit, and resell that movie with only the term "edited" added to it? Does it change the story? Does it change the directors vision? Answer, yes. When editing without permission, you create a new product, not authorized by the copyright holder. This is not the same movie, it is now a totally different movie. If the movie is too harsh for you to watch in its original form, then why the hell would you want to watch it edited? You wont see what all the fuss is about because you wont be watching the same movie. I have seen a demonstration between the original and the clean version. It is horrifying. Saving Private Ryan becomes 20 minutes shorter, and has no blood, or direct acts of violence. Hey, this is a war movie. Would you believe that they also edited "The Princess Diaries"? Yep, not sure for what, but they did. It is unfortunate, but this editing craze is religeously driven, and backed heavily by mormon interest. I am appauled because as a mormon, I feel that my fellow man is trying to tell me what to do. This is not the mission of this particular church, but so many people in it, think that they must save the world from themselves. Our original founder, Joe Smith, had stated publicly that our value system was driven by the desire to aquire all things of beauty and culture. How fortunate that we no longer live to that standard, but instead try to create our own version of what everyone else has. Either live in the world, or shut up and sit down. Dave Dave
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dwayne Caldwell
Master Film Handler
Posts: 323
From: Rockwall, TX, USA
Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 09-26-2002 04:18 PM
quote: It seems today's writers grew up in an amoral atmosphere and are not aware that not everyone in the world behaves in that manner and apparently don't know either that you really CAN write a good story without including profanity and sex.
Have you ever read Catcher in the Rye, Bob? That's littered with graphic language and it was published in 1951. Or how about Chaucer's Canterbury Tales which was written in the late fourteenth century? Better yet, look at some of the implyed sexual situations in ancient Greek mythology. Today's writers grew up in an amoral atmosphere? Give me a break.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|