my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Dual Processor Would it help?

Author Topic: Dual Processor Would it help? Sam Hunter Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 779 From: West Monroe, LA, USA Registered: Jan 2002 posted 01-09-2003 04:26 PM                     So what could a person gain by using a dual processor Motherboard? Say like adding two 1.2G processors to it with Max memory?  |  IP: Logged Daryl C. W. O'Shea Film God Posts: 3977 From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from) Registered: Jun 2002 posted 01-09-2003 05:15 PM                        Would it help what? It all depends on the software and OS. For most people a single 2Ghz processor would work just as well, if not better than dual 1.2's.  |  IP: Logged Steven Pickles Film Handler Posts: 81 From: Gainesville, FL, USA Registered: Mar 2001 posted 01-09-2003 05:54 PM                     Sam, Due to processing, locgical, and bus overhead, you will not see anywhere near double the processing capability. Two processors do more work than one, but never twice as much work. Dual motherboards contain more complex logic to operate both processors and thus cost more to build. Then you have to factor in the cost of two processors. There are even some operating systems that do not understand dual-processing capability--so there's another associated cost. From my experience using NT 4 with dual processors I acheieved only about a 40-60% increase in performance in numerically intensive floating point operations using MATLAB. Like Daryl said, it really does depend on the software and OS. Hope this helps.  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 01-09-2003 05:59 PM                        I benchmarked single vs. dual CPU systems under NT 4 in a 3D Studio Max rendering farm. The dual CPU system was only marginally faster. But keep in mind that Windows 2000/XP is supposed to be much better optimized for multiple CPUs than NT (though I haven't benchmarked anything on Win2K or XP myself). Anyway, there are a lot of variables that affect how well a multiple-CPU system is going to perform in the real world.  |  IP: Logged Daryl C. W. O'Shea Film God Posts: 3977 From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from) Registered: Jun 2002 posted 01-09-2003 06:03 PM                        It should also be noted that stuffing as much RAM as possible into a system doesn't necessarily yield the best system performance. Also, during the height of NT4 I believe that 3D Lightwave had (and may still have) a better multiprocessor, multimachine rendering architecture.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 01-09-2003 06:04 PM                     Not very many PC applications are written in multi-threaded form, which is necessary to take advantage of symmetric multiprocessors. Most computer users will only gain minor benefits at best from dual processor machines. WindowsNT, Win2000 and WinXP Pro can divide tasks from certain applications between the two processors. But in the end, a single CPU is going to handle just about anything a casual user can throw at it. If you happen to be into digital video editing, 3D animation or dealing with very large Adobe Photoshop images, it is advantageous to use a multiprocessor box. IMHO, if someone is going to invest in a multiprocessor system, he ought have a RAID disk system as well. Hard disc input/output is the worst performance bottleneck in computing --and the I/O latency of a single hard disc (particularly an IDE drive) can sap away many of the potential speed gains you would get from having a dual processor setup. There's more on the OS aspect concerning SMP. Some want to upgrade an existing machine to a dual processor box. The last time I checked, WindowsNT/2000/XP must be cleanly installed for SMP use. You can't take an existing single CPU Windows installation and just plop in a second CPU. Win XP makes it even more confusing. The crappy XP Home version is not multiprocessor enabled. And I'm not too sure the standard XP Pro installation CDs have the SMP extensions either. You have to buy special server versions of XP Pro to utilize four-way or eight-way SMP. On the Mac side, its a pretty simple situation with OS X; its SMP enabled standard. But then any G4 tower you buy now is going to have dual processors. Apple also has its new XServe server systems. My understanding is those systems can run 4-way, 8-way or higher numbers of CPUs. But are those things running a different flavor of OS X Server? [ 01-09-2003, 10:18 PM: Message edited by: Bobby Henderson ]  |  IP: Logged Matthew Bailey Master Film Handler Posts: 461 From: Port Arthur,TX Registered: Sep 2000 posted 01-09-2003 06:12 PM                     Any drawbacks,etc. with sticking a pair of Pentium 4's in a laptop or desktop?  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 01-09-2003 06:23 PM                        XP Professional includes dual-CPU support. Some sample benchmarks for XP-Pro on single & dual Intel & AMD processors: Benchmarks There's also "HyperThreading" on some Intel processors. I'm not completely up to speed on HyperThreading, but I think it's a single CPU chip that can mimic much of the behavior & performance advantages of a true dual-CPU architecture. This link has a lot of good info on HyperThreading and other related stuff: HyperThreading Single vs. Dual vs. HyperThreading benchmarks: HyperThreading Benchmarks Oh yeah, don't forget that 2000 and XP Pro support "processor affinity" in SMP systems. Instead of letting the OS split the load up as it sees fit between multiple processors [threads], you can designate a specific task to a specific processor or processors, reserving or freeing up the other processor(s) for other tasks. For example, if you're doing a lot of heavy-duty 3D graphics rendering, you could devote 1 CPU exclusively to rendering, leaving the 2nd CPU available for other tasks. This could be a significant performance enhancement in certain situations.  |  IP: Logged Sam Hunter Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 779 From: West Monroe, LA, USA Registered: Jan 2002 posted 01-09-2003 09:57 PM                     Hmmmmm... Sounds like I just need to invest in a 2.0Ghz system and go from there.I am fairly happy with my 850Mhz AMD Athlon but since I have about 37 processes running in the background I think I could use a little more Horsepower. I have a choice, buy film/projectors or upgrade my PC. Hmmmmm, tough choice. Thanks for the info guys.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 01-09-2003 10:17 PM                     I'm not aware of any portable laptop computers being multiprocessor capable. There's no dual-CPU mobile motherboards on the market as far as I know. Also, a dual-CPU laptop would need one hell of a battery! I'm not aware of there being any drawbacks to putting together a dual-PentiumIV machine. Maybe your electric bill might be a few cents higher every month. You'll have another CPU fan to replace when it dies. And I don't think you can get a dual-CPU configuration on one of those new trendy mini-sized main boards. The newest Pentium IV chip (running at 3.06GHz) is the first to use the "Hyper Threading" architecture. Hyperthreading only works on applications that are multithreaded, like Adobe Photoshop or After Effects. If you enable hyperthreading for an app that isn't multithreaded, you may potentially take a peformance hit over it. Overall, I see Intel's "hyperthreading" concept as a good thing. It will pressure much of the software industry to retool apps to be multithreaded. IMHO, multiprocessing general use computers are way overdue. But the Internet largely sidetracked all that for the past 5 years thanks to the computer companies trying to use web surfing as a means of selling new hardware. You don't need latest-greatest computer technology for much of anything web related. So it is no wonder why much of the computer industry is in the crapper. No need to upgrade!  |  IP: Logged Daryl C. W. O'Shea Film God Posts: 3977 From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from) Registered: Jun 2002 posted 01-09-2003 10:26 PM                        Sam, easy... film and some Brenkerts!  |  IP: Logged Sam Hunter Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 779 From: West Monroe, LA, USA Registered: Jan 2002 posted 01-09-2003 10:37 PM                     I like how you think Daryl!  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 01-09-2003 11:39 PM                     Sam, Depends on what use you have in mind for the computer.....If its just e-mail that does not take much power.....Go to the Salvation Army Re-sale store nearest you and get a used 386 for 10 bucks and run Win 3.2. But if it is primarily for use for Film-Tech then you will need tons of extra computing power, and probably quad processors to sift through all the here . Seriously though, I have been running a dual 1 ghz P3 processor now for a long time. Started out as a single CPU machine with dual MB, but I added the duals to it, and Win 2000 at the same time. Later I switched to XP Pro and wouldn't use anything else...Its great, best OS yet! The main thing I notice is not so much a speed increase but the fact that it has yet to lock up on me....even once! It does have almost 1 gig RAM in it too, but I do attribute the dual cpu feature to it being a less problematic computer. Since I use mine for varying tasks it sees alot of different things.....sometimes several at once too. Overall, its been a fun, VERY reliable computer. Mark  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.