Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » How much is raw film stock?

   
Author Topic: How much is raw film stock?
Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 01-24-2003 01:57 PM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How much is a foot/a second of the film stocks typically used to shoot professional movie productions? Just watched a DVD with a lot of outtakes and couldn`t help wondering how much money is burned every time something goes wrong.
I also would like to know how much a Director of Photography usually makes on a big movie production. I think that the DP has one of the biggest responsibilities on the set, so it would be interesting to know how rewarding in terms of income this occupation is...

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 01-24-2003 02:10 PM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
'Way back' in 1999, in a thread about 70mm film, John Pytlak said that:

On a per-foot basis, the cost of Kodak 70mm print film is about twice the cost of 35mm print film (about 18 cents and 9 cents per foot respectively). So the cost of the raw print stock for a 70mm feature film is about 2.5 times more than 35mm (since the stock is twice the cost per foot, and runs 5/4 faster through the projector).

edit: Oops... I read the subject and thought you wanted prices for raw print stock.

[ 01-24-2003, 04:36 PM: Message edited by: Daryl C. W. O'Shea ]

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-24-2003 02:55 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here is the May 2002 Kodak price guide for CAMERA films:

http://www.kodak.com/US/plugins/acrobat/en/motion/catalog/quick.pdf

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Ogden
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 943
From: Little Falls, N.J.
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-24-2003 03:01 PM      Profile for Mark Ogden   Email Mark Ogden   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It all depends on the kind of shooting you have in mind. A good price for Kodak Vision 2 35mm neg stock would run between $550 to $600 per 1000 ft. roll, which is about 10 min. of shooting time. Buy a 400ft. core of the same and it's about $225.00. 5245 EXS/Daylight runs much higher from some dealers, about $735 for 1000 ft. This is just the cost of the rawstock, no processing. So, blow a few takes and you're running into money!

Oooops, JP just beat me here with the whole price list!

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 01-24-2003 03:03 PM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That is much cheaper than I thought. On the other hand, at the speed the stock travels through the camera...
What about my other question? Much more difficult to answer of course, but I am really quite curious. Imagine the responsibility a DP has for the otcome of the project! Yet most people aren`t even aware of what they do.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Beres
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 606
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 01-24-2003 03:16 PM      Profile for Joe Beres   Email Joe Beres   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
DPs, operators, and their assistants (remember, they are the ones that load the camera mags, and often are in charge of the mechanics of the camera) have an unbelieveable responsibility. I'd say that the camera assistant position has the highest ratio of stress to recognition. In many ways, an entire day's production is riding on their shoulders.

As far as how much money a Cinematographer makes, I don't really know, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if some of the better known shooters in the business have a day rate of well over $5000.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-24-2003 08:26 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you want to do some general shooting you can buy short endsand re-cans for about 25 to 50% of the list price per foot.
If you go this route its best to shoot a few testsoff each roll to be sure its ok first!!
Mark @ CLACO
ww.clacoequipment.com

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 01-24-2003 09:58 PM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Mark, but I don`t plan to shoot a movie myself! I just happened to watch a lot of making-ofs and docu stuff on DVD, and these questions sprang into my mind. A lot of director`s commentaries on DVDs credit their DPs heavily and so I started wondering what kind of money they take home. I think many people don`t realise how complex that job is, they probably think it`s just the guy who points the camera.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-24-2003 10:08 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Kodak website has interviews with many prominent cinematographers:

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/forum/onFilm/

Also, check out the Kodak publication "In Camera":

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/newsletters/

To search out an article about a particular cinematographer or movie, use the "Search Motion Picture" tool on the Kodak website:

http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-24-2003 10:23 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For those who prefer DIGITAL, Kodak manufactures 12-megapixel sensors having the best dynamic range, tone scale, and color reproduction of any on the market. For convenience in handling, they are attached to a durable clear 35mm plastic base, and sold in roll form. Kodak sells these remarkable sensors for less than 4 cents (<$0.04 US) each! They are called FILM. [Cool]

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 01-24-2003 10:52 PM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have read most of the cinematographers` interviews on the Kodak website. BTW it has to be said that your website is a fantastic source of information!

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 01-24-2003 11:09 PM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
For those who prefer DIGITAL, Kodak manufactures 12-megapixel sensors ... Kodak sells these remarkable sensors for less than 4 cents (<$0.04 US) each! They are called FILM.
4 cents in quantities of how many thousand?

I'd like to place an order for 3 units please. I'd like to build my own 3 CCD camera in my spare time.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 01-25-2003 01:36 AM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I'd say that the camera assistant position has the highest ratio of stress to recognition.
Having worked on some productions as a 2nd assistant and/or camera loader, I can vouch that the above statement is absolutely correct!

As for salaries, like many professions, this type of info is not always discussed or revealed. However, you might be able to get the basic union rates for camera crew members by contacting the International Cinematographers Guild, which is a part of the IATSE (International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees...one of the logos you often see in film credits next to the MPAA globe logo signifying a film was a union production). Successful DPs - particularly award winners and those who are members of an honors society (ASC, BSC, etc.) - can often "name their price" for a job.

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Lacheur
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 650
From: British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 01-25-2003 03:45 AM      Profile for Ron Lacheur   Email Ron Lacheur   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
DP wage for IATSE 669 ( Vancouver ) has a hourly rate of $75/hr in canadian funds.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 01-25-2003 11:58 AM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Imagine the responsibility a DP has for the otcome of the project!
Precisely! This is something I was thinking about just this morning. I was watching a behind-the-scenes show on some feature that the writer was directing. The thing that got my goat was, this kid wrote a screenplay, what does he know about making a movie: setups, staging, camera movements, composition, the logistical considerations of shooting out of sequence? Probably nothing!

People don't realize just how many movies today are actually being made by the cinematographer. He's the one making sure shots cut together; screen direction and looks are consistent between setups; ensuring that composition, camera, and actor movements harmonize for the best translation of dramatic elements to the screen.

Meantime, the public and press fawn over the latest "whiz-kid" writer/"directors", and the cinematographer's contribution is minimized or overlooked entirely.

There are exceptions, naturally.

Incidentally, in response to the original question, realize that not every take is printed. For flubs, a production is really only out the camera stock and processing cost - and the production time, of course. For putting the flubs on DVD, they only have to transfer from the negative, so they're not out anything in that respect, either.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.