Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » DX4900 query for John Pytlak.

   
Author Topic: DX4900 query for John Pytlak.
John Spooner
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 186
From: South Australia, Australia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 02-23-2003 08:52 AM      Profile for John Spooner   Email John Spooner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dear John,
In your professional opinion, what would be the best setting for making 8x10 prints. The 2.2 megapixel or the 4 megapixel high compression setting, seeing the file size is almost the same for either.
Regards. John Spooner.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-23-2003 10:45 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm not John but I believe the compressed file from the 4M image contains more usable data than the similarly sized 2M uncompressed file and ought to produce the better picture, unless there is some aspect of the particular picture that is being particularly degraded by the compression algorithim.

Since you're talking about different settings on the same 4M camera why not lock the camera down on a tripod and take a few sample photos at both settings, dump them to your computer and upsize the smaller image to the same pixel dimensions as the larger using Photoshop or similar software? Then pick an area of high detail and zoom your view into great enlargement on both versions and compare them side by side. Surely there will be more detail in the large image, despite it having been compressed and decompressed.

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 02-23-2003 01:18 PM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The camera uses lossy JPEG compression, so it's never really uncompressed. However, the Kodak DX series cameras (actually most, if not all of their cameras) are pretty good about JPEG compression. You'll see the filesize increase drastically for images that 'have a lot of different stuff & colour'. So you'd probably be best using the 4MP High Compression.

Of course you'd be best to buy yourself a larger memory card. They are cheap compared to what you would have paid for that camera.

Editing the subject title so that you spell John's last name correctly might get a faster response too. [Smile]

[ 02-23-2003, 05:16 PM: Message edited by: Daryl C. W. O'Shea ]

 |  IP: Logged

John Spooner
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 186
From: South Australia, Australia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 02-24-2003 08:08 AM      Profile for John Spooner   Email John Spooner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dear Steve and Daryl.
Thank you for your interest in this matter and for information supplied.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-25-2003 03:01 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In general, the more data the better. Compression artifacts are scene-dependent. For 8x10 inch prints, I'd go for the 4 megapixel setting.

 |  IP: Logged

John Spooner
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 186
From: South Australia, Australia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 02-27-2003 11:49 AM      Profile for John Spooner   Email John Spooner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dear John, thank you for your reply. The definition on the 4900 is exceptional, I am currently using the 4mp (high comp) setting as per advice received.
Thank you to yourself,Steve and Daryl.
John Spooner.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-27-2003 02:12 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Information about digital photography:

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/digital/dlc/index.jhtml

http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/products/index.jhtml

http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.