|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Movie Trailer to Promote Upcoming DVD Release
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 03-01-2003 11:01 AM
quote: If I want the Die Another Day DVD I will buy it regardless of whether I see an ad or not.
That's the whole purpose of the ad. To make those that don't want to buy it feel inadequate until they do. I mean, look at all the MONEY that movie made at the box office!! Don't you want to own a copy of this movie that made so much MONEY??
It's funny that some people think they actually have self-control when it comes to consumerism. (And I don't mean you personally, Richard) But the majority of people that say, "I won't buy such-and-such just because of the commercial!" see some funny or amazing nonsense promoting some stupid product and say, "Wow! That was an awesome commercial! Pringles is cool." On the next trip to the store, they buy pringles.
Commercials try to form emotional attatchments between people and products. It's these emotional ties that the companies rely on for brand loyalty and product longevity. It's what gets people to write to the companies proclaiming how their life would be incomplete without the said product, and they do. Remember the New Coke fiasco in the 80's? People wrote in with comments like, "The only things I had in my life were Jesus and Coca-Cola. Now you have taken one of those from me."
You're NOT FULLY CLEAN unless you're Zest fully clean! Wouldn't you really rather have a Buick? You GOTTA eat Checkers! ...and remember, our product ALWAYS works BETTER than the "leading brand"!
on Madison Avenue!! Gotta love Marketing class! =TMP=
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 03-02-2003 10:49 AM
Brad -- "New Coke" was just a marketing ploy. Genius marketing, if you ask me...
Come out with a new product. Everybody tries it, so you have booming sales. Now there are TWO cokes! How will Pepsi compete, right? 85% don't like it. 85% start screaming. National press coverage, the topic of every news show, four minutes on live national network TV, an interview with the president, and publicity you couldn't buy if you tried. What next? Bring BACK the old coke! Re-release the SAME product! Nationwide buzz again. Coke is BACK and now it's called COKE CLASSIC! YAY!
The result: Everything's back to normal, sales are up, and thanks for the unfathomable free advertizing!
=TMP=
| IP: Logged
|
|
Tao Yue
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 209
From: Princeton, NJ
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 03-03-2003 01:43 AM
Thomas, you're confusing the matter. New Coke did not cause a surge in sales, especially not by having two products on the market, since the old formula was simultaneously withdrawn.
Here's what happened:
- In the early 1980s, Pepsi was rapidly gaining market share.
- The Pepsi Taste Challenge (and Coca-Cola's own market research), showed that in a blind taste test, people tend to prefer Pepsi to Coke.
- Coke decides to strike back with a new formula.
- Coke and New Coke would then have aggregate market share greater than Pepsi. HOWEVER, the market for Coke would be split, and neither Coke nor New Coke would individually outsell Pepsi.
- Coke decided not to hand Pepsi this marketing advantage. The original Coke formula was withdrawn at the same time that the new Coke formula was introduced.
- People go nuts because of their perceived preference for Coke. All through the frenzy, both Pepsi and Coke studies show that people prefer the new Coke to Pepsi, and Pepsi to the old Coke.
- Coke introduces Coke Classic and renames the new Coke formula to New Coke.
Conspiracy theories include:
- Coke made a brilliant marketing move.
- Coke wanted to abrogate contracts with its bottlers that were 100 years old and contained some very unfavorable terms.
- Coke was trying to surreptitiously remove the sugar from Coke and replace it with high-fructose corn syrup.
The first is the most widely-held conspiracy theory. But remember that Pepsi had NEVER before challenge Coke on the taste. Pepsi was always the underdog, going bankrupt twice in its history. In the 1940s, Pepsi challenged Coke on price (twice as much for a nickel). In the 1960s, Pepsi pushed the "alternative" (rebellious) nature of Pepsi. Only in the 1970s did it start its taste test. Some will say Coke couldn't have been so stupid as to think that people will accept a reformulation, but Coke never before had to fear an inferior formula. Even today, most Americans prefer Pepsi over Coke in the tastebuds (though some will vehemently deny it), but Coke is preferred over Pepsi in the heart.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|