my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Bill Clinton Tapped For Jury Duty! (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Bill Clinton Tapped For Jury Duty! Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-01-2003 11:43 PM                     Here is the link to the article.... http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030301/ap_on_re_us/clinton_jury_duty I can only hope this shuts him up for a while so GWB can get the job done with one less baboon harping in his nonsense.... Mark  |  IP: Logged Sam Hunter Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 779 From: West Monroe, LA, USA Registered: Jan 2002 posted 03-01-2003 11:55 PM                     Any kind of publicity Mr. Bill can get the better he likes it. Personally if I where a judge I would drop him as he ws disbarred for reasons of bad judgement and shouldn't be relied on to give good judgement. Shit, dont get me started, I just hope the female jurors keep there guard up and if he comes towards them with a cigar in his hand they better run.  |  IP: Logged Mike Heenan Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1896 From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 03-02-2003 12:08 AM                     What does Clinton getting picked for jury duty have to do with Bush doing his job?  |  IP: Logged Steve Kraus Film God Posts: 4094 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: May 2000 posted 03-02-2003 12:56 AM                    Good question. I haven't heard of him commenting on Dubya's policies although as a private citizen he has every right to.  |  IP: Logged Greg Mueller Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1687 From: Port Gamble, WA Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-02-2003 10:26 AM                        Can a convicted perjurer be on a jury? I don't think he really knows the difference between right and wrong does he?  |  IP: Logged Sam Hunter Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 779 From: West Monroe, LA, USA Registered: Jan 2002 posted 03-02-2003 10:49 AM                     I don't think he was convicted, just disbarred. Convicted would mean Jailed right?  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-02-2003 11:21 AM                     Mike, Don't you ever watch TV? Keeping Slick Willie on the jury keeps him off TV and out of the limelight..... Mark  |  IP: Logged Mike Heenan Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1896 From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 03-02-2003 02:52 PM                     I have no problems with Clinton being in the limelight. I just dont see what one has to do with the other. I'm sure Bush could care less about Clinton's opinions anyways.  |  IP: Logged William Leland III Master Film Handler Posts: 336 From: Charleston, SC, Registered: Aug 2002 posted 03-02-2003 03:42 PM                        I agree with Mike Heenan. If Bill Clinton is on the jury why would Bush care. I think it would be interesting if Clinton was on the jury. I hope he gets picked.  |  IP: Logged Claude S. Ayakawa Film God Posts: 2738 From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA Registered: Aug 2002 posted 03-02-2003 05:15 PM                        Mark, I have known you for some time now at the DCinemazone (Movie Sound Page) forum and here at Film Tech and I consider you my friend. It is a very well known fact that you and many conservative Republicans never liked Bill Clinton ever since he entered the political limelight. The man was given no peace of mind by his many political enemies all through eight years of his presidency and now has become a subject of ridicule by people like you and others. Yes, the man had made some very stupid mistakes that almost cost him his job but he is still very much loved my most Americans. I would appreciate it very much if you would please give the man a break by not posting articles about him that has been very offensive to people who still admire him like myself and a few others here. Thank You! -Claude  |  IP: Logged Paul Linfesty Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1383 From: Bakersfield, CA, USA Registered: Nov 1999 posted 03-02-2003 06:06 PM                     quote: not posting articles about him that has been very offensive to people who still admire him like myself and a few others here. There are also postings making fun of Bush in this forum, and some conservatives may take offense at that. But even though Im not a fan of Bush and was a Clinton supporter, I would hate to see each other's speech curtailed in the room. Because if they give up their Clinton bashing, I'll have to give up my Bush bashing, and to quote the Sam Neil character in JURASSIC PARK, "where's the fun in that?  |  IP: Logged Steve Kraus Film God Posts: 4094 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: May 2000 posted 03-02-2003 08:55 PM                    I don't think Clinton or his supporters have anything to apologize for insofar as his doing the job of President is concerned. He may have mishandled matters when his private life was dragged into the limelight as a result of a politically motivated lawsuit but that is of little concern to me and I cannot imagine (short of politics, of course!) why it would be of any greater concern to the public than the personal failings of many prominent members of the opposition like Gingrich and Hyde, etc. Everything Mr. Bush does is about helping the rich and deflecting criticism of those policies, like for one thing portraying even the mere discussion of this issue as "class warfare."  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-02-2003 09:11 PM                     Hi Claude, While I don't personally care for Slick Willie much GWB also has his share of problems too. His speech impediment is one major problem....and at times its hilarious. But my real problem with the liberal democrats is that they get up and ridicule the conservatives solution to different problems but they have not once come up with any alternative solution. So yes, I will definately continue to make fun of them until they provide some constructive input, that makes sense, to todays problems. Tom Daschle is a prime example of that sort of tom foolery, Hillary is another. For me, its just difficult to believe that someone as dishonest as Bill Clinton is would ever be earmarked for Jury Duty. Mark  |  IP: Logged Hillary Charles Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 748 From: York, PA, USA Registered: Feb 2001 posted 03-02-2003 09:45 PM                     "Tom Daschle is a prime example of that sort of tom foolery, Hillary is another." Sorry Mark, I'll try to be more serious in the future.  |  IP: Logged Sam Hunter Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 779 From: West Monroe, LA, USA Registered: Jan 2002 posted 03-02-2003 10:48 PM                     What was the deal when Bush took over and there was all that vandalism and stuff removed from the white house? Anybody remember that?  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.