my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » I Still Like The Way Ford Motor Company Does Things (sometimes) (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: I Still Like The Way Ford Motor Company Does Things (sometimes) Paul G. Thompson The Weenie Man Posts: 4718 From: Mount Vernon WA USA Registered: Nov 2000 posted 08-24-2003 05:43 PM                     I still like the way Ford Motor Company does things. (for the most part, anyway) My Ford Escort didn't have a cruise control. I decided to rectify that. So, I pussyfooted off to the junk yard and struck a deal with my longtime friend who runs the damn place. He said, "Yeah, just go up on the hill and get everything you need to put one on your car. You can have it for 35 bucks." Done deal. So, I went up on the hill. I started unscrewing, screwing, cussing and scratching my butt trying to figure out just what I needed to do the job. I got the steering wheel with all the buttons, diaphragm linkage and adapter to the throttle linkage, the diaphragm assembly, the speed sensor that goes inline with the speedometer cable, vacuum hoses and vacuum dump valve and the wiring harness for the speed sensor and diaphragm assembly plus all the nuts and bolts to go along with it. I threw all the crap in the back of my other car, and hauled it home. When I ripped my steering wheel off my car, I noticed the clock spring only used two dicks. The steering wheel with all the buttons wanted three dicks. Oops...forgot the speed control computer and the clock spring wiper with three dicks. Another trip. Unscrewed the speed computer, and noticed a wiring loom was much different from mine. I thought "Aw, shit." Much to my surprise, Ford made an "add-on" wiring harness to accommodate factory add-ons without having to splice into existing wire loom. Just simply unplug the brake light switch, and two other plugs, the two-Dick wiper, replace the two-Dick wiper with a three-Dick wiper, plug all the shit in, and presto! No wiring splices to be made, and no damage to the original loom to make it compatible. Then simply stuff the add-on loom under the dashboard and secure it to pre-drilled holes in the brackets so the wiring does not foul or chafe on bare metal surfaces. Oops...forgot something. The little plastic trigger that actuates the vacuum dump valve when the brake is applied. No biggie....I'll get that tomorrow. When I clip that on the brake pedal and install the speed sensor, the cruise control will be fully operational. The point I am getting at is Ford's electrical designing engineers seem to have some foresight, unlike General Motors. Whenever I attempted to do something like this on a GM product, it is nothing but a major nightmare. Nothing seems to fit, splices have to be made, and when you get done, it will finally work (if you are lucky.) I wanted to put a power driver's seat in my Chevrolet Breadbox. After I looked it over carefully, I abandoned the idea. The electrical interface was totally incompatible with a power seat. I would have to replace the entire wiring harness under the dashboard. With Ford, just get an auxiliary wiring loom from a junkyard and plug it in and it is done. To be fair, there are some areas where Ford really missed the boat! The AXOD transmission used in the Taurus comes to mind. It was one of the worst that was ever designed. On the other hand, General Motor's Turbo 350 was, without a doubt, one of the best. Oh, by the way. You don't need a steering wheel puller to remove a steering wheel. Just simply use brute force with a slanted forehead and rip the damn thing off. Loosen the nut but DO NOT REMOVE IT! (not just yet) Then get yourself in a good mechanical position where you can pull and wiggle like hell, and POP! Off it will come. The nut you left on will prevent you from flying through the rear window when the wheel lets loose! Nothing like going ass over tea kettle with a stearing wheel planted in your teeth.  |  IP: Logged Andrew Duggan Expert Film Handler Posts: 127 From: Albany, NY, USA Registered: Jun 2002 posted 08-24-2003 10:54 PM                        I'm in the process of buying and restoring a '62 Ford Falcon, and was, just five minutes before reading that, looking into taking off and replacing the steering wheel. Good to know  |  IP: Logged Sam Hunter Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 779 From: West Monroe, LA, USA Registered: Jan 2002 posted 08-24-2003 11:14 PM                     Andrew, Have you ever seen the Falcon that looks like a ranchero? I don't remember what’s its called but they are the coolest vehicle around. Paul, From what an old engineer told me one time about Chevrolet is that when designed the Chevrolet is designed top notch and if built according to that design they would be very reliable and worthy of any bodies garage. The problem is that the bean counters step in after the design process and look for ways to save money and cut corners and before you know it you get an inferior product. However the 67 and 68 Chevy C10 I had where still going strong and the same could not be said for the ford counterparts of the day. As the old saying goes, FORD=F(Found On The Road Dead) or another saying "Dust to Dust, Ashes to Ashes, If it wasn't for Fords our tools would rust" I like Chevy's but I also like Fords to a degree and I am considering buying one but I wont be caught dead driving another Dodge, I hate em.  |  IP: Logged Phil Hill I love my cootie bug Posts: 7595 From: Hollywood, CA USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 08-24-2003 11:53 PM                  Sam, another: FORD = Fix Or Repair Daily I own both a Ford and GM product. They're both are great. I've not had any problems with either and I'm NOT very easy on ANY of my vehicles...never have been. They are a tool to serve me and I want the power and the performance and I want it NOW! >>> Phil  |  IP: Logged Will Kutler Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1506 From: Tucson, AZ, USA Registered: Feb 2001 posted 08-25-2003 12:05 AM                     Andrew, I am a strong Falcon enthusiast. My baby is my '65 Ranchero that I am in the midst of working on. Anyhow, I'll be glad to help ya out in your quest. I have tons of info regarding restoration tips, upgrade-modifications, parts sources and club information. My e-mail is WKUTLER1506@yahoo.com Sam: From 1960 thru 1965, the Ranchero was based on the Falcon design. There were 2 and 4 door sedans, 2 door convertibles, 2 door hardtop and sprints, 2 and 4 door station wagons, Rancheros and panel delivery trucks. The Rancheero was basically a 2 door stationion wagon with the top rear enclosure removed, and the panel delivery had a special enclosure. The 1964 1/2-1965 Mustang was also based on the Falcon chassis. Ford also produced modified AFX Falcons for 1/4 mile drag racing. 1960-1963 Falcons had the "soft round nose". 1964-1965 the sheetmetal from the beltline down was changed to the starburst design. I can write extensively about equipment and optionss, so if ya have questions, then please ask. My baby is a 65 Ranchero 66H. This was a deluxe with bucket seats of which only 990 rolled off the assembly line. I am in the midst of doing extensive work to this car, the goal being to upgrade the performance, safety and handling w/o compromising the origonal sheetmetal. There are loads of bolt on performance items now being made for these cars, everything from instruments, suspension, engine, braking, etc. Andrew, if your interested in a new steering wheel, then look into Grant. They produce specific kits to adopt their custom steering wheels to specific automobiles. If you plan on changing the steering column, then look into Flaming River products to see if they have an application. There is also a kit out that you can use to convert your origonal 6 cyl over to a 289.  |  IP: Logged Paul G. Thompson The Weenie Man Posts: 4718 From: Mount Vernon WA USA Registered: Nov 2000 posted 08-25-2003 01:25 AM                     Sam, Every "Shovvie" I ever had was a pile of crap. First GM product: 1950 Chevrolet. Dip 'n Piss engine oiling system. Works fine...as long as you don't exceed 45mph. You'll burn up the babbit rods. Second GM product: 1952 Buick Special, equipped with Dyna-Slosh transmission coupled to the Buick Dyna-Trash Fireball 8 engine. Burned up the rod and main bearings in two engines. Third GM product: 1953 Buick Special. Rod and main bearings went out. Had to take a train back to the base because the damn thing went HS 700 miles out of Memphis. Fourth GM product: 1956 Buick Special. Manual transmission. It loved eating clutch plates and pressure plates. The release fingers on the pressure plates would just break off. The poppet balls in the transmission never did "pop" correctly. Couldn't get the damn thing out of low gear unless I took a crowbar and forced the transmission linkage. Fifth GM product. 1955 Chevrolet. Not a bad car, with the exception of a few minor details. Front end ball joints were ready to fall out, overhead valve oiling system was deficient, and the bell housing was cracked. But yet, the car was never obused or driven that hard. Sixth GM product: 1960 Chevrolet. Had a turbo-glide transmission and a 348 engine. Dropped the transmission in it. Head gasket problems with the engine. Seventh GM product: 1962 Chevrolet. Front end would not stay in alignment. Eighth GM product: 1974 Chevrolet Caprice. 148 HP 350 engine. Leaked oil and always marked its spot just like a dog. One of the biggest piles of crap I ever owned besides a Ford Taurus. See 1994 Chevrolet Breadbox. Same shit...only on a different shovel. Ninth GM product: 1974 Chevrolet 1/2 ton pickup. Busted block. Tenth GM product: 1994 Chevrolet Breadbox. V-6. Not enough power to pull a fly off a cow turd. The most uncomfortable piece of shit I ever drove. Seat belts so damn uncomfortable to wear it makes you want to risk a no-seatbelt ticket. Gas hog. Overdrive is worthless because of the lack of engine power. I have had GM, Ford, and Chrylser products. The best of luck I have had was with Ford products. I had one dog in the Ford line: That was that 1991 Taurus. I rate that thing in the same catagory as the 1994 Chevrolet Breadbox as well as the 1974 Chevrolet "Crappie". With GM in general, the radiator must have been on the low end of a totem pole. Overheating in the early Chevrolets and Buicks seemed to be normal. Never had any problems with Ford's cooling systems. I never had a Ford that left me stranded with a major mechanical malfunction. But I sure as hell have with GM products! The Washington State Patrol drives Fords. The Crown Victorias to be specific. The troopers love those things. Many law enforcement agencies used to drive the Chevrolet "Crappies". (The Upsidedown Jelly Bean). The problems they had were cracked frames and after a high speed chase they had to be towed in because the brakes didn't work due to brake fluid boiling. The calipers were designed shitty. They dumped those things in favor of Ford. Jack from Port Orchard might remember that flap. The city police of Bremerton and the Katshit County Sheriff's Department had those Chevrolets. (Ummmm - that's Kitsap County) OK, Sam. I know some people swear by GM and curse at Ford. I swear by Ford and curse GM. I buy the shit that seems to be the most reliable. And it sure is hell is not GM products anymore. But yes, I agree with the Chrysler products. I had some of them, too. (along with a Voltswagon, but I wont' go into that one.) But I have to admit...Josh's mom had a Geo. It is a good car. Josh's sister is using it now. I guess they have had very good reliability with that thing. Josh has a Geo, also. His Izoozoo finally died. That car was a zoo. I was the one who changed the front struts in that thing two years ago because they were worn out. The transmission was loose, and it finally dropped by deciding to lose a few gears. That forced Josh into buying another car.  |  IP: Logged Bill Enos Film God Posts: 2081 From: Richmond, Virginia, USA Registered: Apr 2000 posted 08-25-2003 08:43 AM                     If that Escort is a '93 or later it's a Mazda in disguise.  |  IP: Logged Darryl Spicer Film God Posts: 3250 From: Lexington, KY, USA Registered: Dec 2000 posted 08-25-2003 09:03 AM                    That 91 Taurus was one big piece of crap. My dad worked for a company that suplied weather strip parts for fords. When that model was being made he was constantly having to go up to the ford plant to inspect the parts that they sent to them. Ford was trying to say that the parts were not what they specified. Turns out that it was what they specified but that there apparently was a design flaw in the door. That just put a bad taste in my mouth for that perticular car.  |  IP: Logged Mike Williams Master Film Handler Posts: 255 From: Knoxville, TN Registered: Feb 2002 posted 08-25-2003 09:13 AM                     quote: Then get yourself in a good mechanical position where you can pull and wiggle like hell, and POP! Off it will come. The nut you left on will prevent you from flying through the rear window when the wheel lets loose! Nothing like going ass over tea kettle with a stearing wheel planted in your teeth. Especially if the steering wheel has an air bag.  |  IP: Logged Sam Hunter Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 779 From: West Monroe, LA, USA Registered: Jan 2002 posted 08-25-2003 09:36 AM                     Paul, Come on, you like Chevy,s, your just afraid to say it  |  IP: Logged Evans A Criswell Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1579 From: Huntsville, AL, USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 08-25-2003 09:57 AM                        I guess our family has been lucky about getting reliable cars: 1969 GMC Pickup truck (1972-1981): Had around 200000 miles on it when we traded it in. Very powerful V8 engine and comfortable, smooth riding, but really drank gas. Had the "350" engine in it. Automatic transmission, 3 speed. 1971 Volkswagen Bug (1971-1979): Had around 190000 miles on it when we sold it to a guy that lived near us. We saw it go down the road for years after selling it to him. Extremely reliable car. 4-speed manual transmission. 1979 Toyota Corolla (1979-1986): Had almost 200000 miles on it when traded in. It would have lasted forever since it didn't have enough power to tear up anything. Had the weakest 4 cylinder engine. :-) Economical car and extremely reliable. 5-speed manual transmission. 1980 Honda Civic (1984-1991): Had around 190000 miles on it when sold. Developed an aggravating accelerator pump problem that we had trouble fixing, although the guy we sold it to fixed it drove it for a long time afterwards. Extremely reliable car. had 4 cylinder engine but was more powerful than the Toyotas we had. 5-speed manual transmision. 1981 Toyota Pickup truck (1981-1990): Don't remember how many miles were on it, but we sold it to the same guy that bought the 1980 Honda Civic and he drove it for a while. Extremely reliable truck. Had rather weak 4 cylinder engine. 5-speed manual transmission. 1987 Buick Somerset (1986-2002): Had around 190000 miles on it when I sold it. The lady that bought it from me had excellent luck with it until she totalled it in a wreck. Had 3.0L V6, automatic transmission. 1990 Chevrolet Pickup Truck V6 (1990-1992): A good truck, but my parents wanted a better one with an extended cab. They traded it in a couple years after buying it. It had a 5-speed manual transmission and my parents, getting older, didn't want that anymore, and I didn't either, since our driving is city driving. 1992 Dodge Pickup Truck V8 Automatic (1992-present): Very good truck, doesn't yet have 100000 miles on it. 1995 Pontiac Bonneville 4DR 3.8 V6 (1994-present): Excellent car. Has just over 99000 miles on it, but not quite to 100000. 4-speed automatic (in the highest gear, 65MPH is 1900 RPM.) Very economical for its size, getting nearly 30 MPG on the highway. 2002 Mercury Grand Marquis (2002-present): So far so good. Rear wheel drive -- Lots of room to work around the engine as a result.  |  IP: Logged Paul G. Thompson The Weenie Man Posts: 4718 From: Mount Vernon WA USA Registered: Nov 2000 posted 08-25-2003 11:49 AM                     Mike, you have to remove the airbag from the steering wheel first even before you can get at the nut on the steering shaft. The airbag part is held on by two screws in some cases.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 08-29-2003 09:37 AM                     Of course you can take a look at what Ford was building in 1955 and what Chevy was building which was light years ahead. It took Ford quite a while to play catch up. As for trucks I'll still stick with Dodge Trucks. They are tough as Fords but have alot nicer ride. The Cummins is also ALOT more reliable diesel than the Ford Power Joke is.... Just as a note: A best friend of mine went to work for GM about 10 years ago and works as an engineer at the stampping plant in Grand Rapids. He refuses to own a GM product! Mark @ CLACO  |  IP: Logged Paul G. Thompson The Weenie Man Posts: 4718 From: Mount Vernon WA USA Registered: Nov 2000 posted 08-29-2003 12:45 PM                     Mark said: quote: The Cummins is also ALOT more reliable diesel than the Ford "Power Joke" is.... Mark, you nailed that one on the button. International Harvester supplied the Power Joke engine. The one in my truck has known issues such as busting injector lines on No. 1 cylinder. By the way...Yesterday I was talking to a friend of mine who is a retired state trooper. We were talking about patrol cars and he mentioned that one of the reasons they like driving Fords is because they are much easier to maintain and they seem to be more more relialble. They hold up to "beatings" they have to take much better. To be fair, he also mentioned that he had a Ford as a POV, and it was a true POS. I had one like that, too. It was a Taurus. He didn't say what kind his was. He said Chryslers don't hold up to the beating the cars get but they are faster and more powerful. GM has too many reliability issues. As a side note, I finished installing the factory cruise control on my Escort. Works great! No troubleshooting or crap like that.  |  IP: Logged Darryl Spicer Film God Posts: 3250 From: Lexington, KY, USA Registered: Dec 2000 posted 08-30-2003 11:48 AM                    but police cruisers have special things done to them because of what they are used for. I think the suspensions are different designs and engines are modified designs.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.