|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Deluge of Worm-laden E-Mail
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."
Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 09-20-2003 11:52 AM
In the last two days, my e-mail boxes for work and at home (particularly my home DSL account) have been filled with a lot of worm-infected e-mails.
For the past few months I've changed my e-mail answering habits to using remote, web-based methods instead of apps like Outlook Express, which ignorantly try to read every note automatically and allow malicious code to launch.
Late Thursday, Friday and this Saturday morning, there's just been a ton of these infected notes coming into the mail boxes. My SBC/Yahoo DSL account conveniently throws a lot of these notes into my "Bulk" junk mail folder. I just hit the empty button on it and the Trash folder and most of the malicious notes are gone. Still, some come into the main e-mail box too. The volume of infected notes seems to be increasing too. Just this morning, my personal e-mail folder had 5 infected notes in it. The bulk folder had 54!
Nearly all of these notes had file attachments roughly 143k in size. There were a few featuring 14k or 16k (obviously bearing harmful scripts). They all have those subject lines "Latest Network Patch," "Internet Security Patch" etc. with the sender being "MS Corporation" or "Microsoft Customer Service" or "Yahoo Customer Service." There are many other variations on it.
Obviously many of these notes have to be coming from infected computers, whose users were ignorant enough to read the note to see what was attached. I use the word "ignorant" to describe these users since harmful e-mails have been bearing the "Microsoft Customer Support, Latest Security Patch" title for over a year now.
Anyway, I'm kind of surprised CNN and other press people aren't short-stroking this latest rash of e-mail virus/worm problems. The more maddening thing is law enforcement authorities continuing not to take this stuff seriously at all. If I go and torch the store front of a business, I'll get slapped with a felony conviction, massive fines and a healthy amount of jail time. Do a similar amount of monetary damange against a company via computer, and I'll get treated like a member of a country club. As I said before in another related post, I don't think law enforcement people and the Department of Justice will care much about this garbage until it kills someone.
Oh, it also scares me quite a bit to hear that many banks are looking to move their ATM systems to Windows server products by 2005. With the way Microsoft cares about security, your money will be safer under a bed mattress.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."
Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 09-21-2003 05:19 PM
This is one shred of hope in all this. Many servers keep very detailed logs of who pings through. It is getting more difficult for criminals to anonymize (or "spoof") their headers in the malicious apps they launch. That, and the combination of a number of different security tools, such as S.A.T.A.N., can identify the source of cracking attacks. So, there is a decent shot the originator of Sven32 will eventually be tracked down. My hope is the scumbag will be found to reside in a developed nation with extradition treaties and legal agreements. If that is the case, then there is hope the criminal(s) will get some kind of punishment.
Here's the fair punishment for hackers. Anyone who develops and launches a harmful virus or worm should be subject to several charges carrying automatic federal level felony penalites, such as breaking and entering, invasion of privacy, conspiracy to commit corporate or government espionage, conspiracy to commit identity theft, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, etc. Each of these counts gets multiplied for each computer infected. If I had my way, these scumbags could potentially go to jail for the rest of their lives.
To add to this, these criminals should be subject to various civil penalities. I would definitely make it so users of infected computers could bring a class-action suit against the hacker on civil rights violations, and that's on top of the physical damage the hacker did to the user's computer data.
Some might cringe at the severity of punishment I demand. But consider everything from hospital computers to traffic control systems are being converted to run on Microsoft's faulty software. These hackers are eventually going to get someone killed with their dungeons and dragons fantasy jerk off sci-fi geek-fest bullshit. To hear fans of 2600.com talk, they think hacking is some altruistic way of getting back at the establishment or some left-wing cartoony bullcrap like that. The only people they hurt are small business employees and home computer users. They hurt little people not big wigs.
To put it another way, if I go and torch the front of a business I am going to go to jail for arson and be punished pretty severly for the physical damage I did to that business. The Department of Justice doesn't seem to realize that damage to computer systems affects business in the same harmful way, costing them lots of money. It's just that a hacker can, with one keystroke, do the monetary damage equal to torching thousands of store fronts. The fucker needs to go to prison forever and be poor forever for doing that shit.
Oh, and I almost forgot, Microsoft really ought to be sued dearly for their neglect of the Windows operating system. The company, by their own choice, has rigged Windows where they can leverage functions of MS Office, Outlook Express, Internet Explorer and a growing number of other MS-branded apps to function better by being grafted (or rather "Frankensteined") into the Win32 kernal. Their monopolistic moves have created much of this security nightmare. They have helped put the computers of millions at risk just for never-ending corporate expansion and greed. So I think it would be perfectly fair for a class-action suit to be brought against MS for this nonsense. [ 09-22-2003, 05:27 PM: Message edited by: Bobby Henderson ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|