|
|
Author
|
Topic: Still Four More Microsoft Critical Flaws In Their Windows Software.
|
|
|
|
|
Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God
Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002
|
posted 10-15-2003 11:52 PM
Microsoft's not the only one patching holes in their operating system... they just get the most press. Oh well.
Their recent move to monthly updates, instead of weekly updates on Wednesday, is actually a good thing since nearly all exploits come on the heals of a patch or update, very rarely beforehand.
There will still be exploits written based on patches that Microsoft releases, but at least we'll only have to deal with them monthly, rather than weekly.
Further, with the upcoming release of SUS 2.0, administrators in the corporate environment should have it easier when deploying network wide system security policies and deploying relevant patches to uphold them.
Really though, what would you rather Microsoft do? They can't win no matter what they do. They could go back to the days of release an operating system and leaving it. They'd then be bashed for not supporting it / not fixing security issues with it. Or they can release more and more patches to fix the security issues and be bashed about the constant stream of security patches. They just can't win.
Here's where they're at fault though... combining the desktop OSes and the server OSes. This is the single reason why Microsoft server software vulnerabilities are on the rise (well that and its rising market share). It makes writing an exploit even more enticing... not only can you target the billion (or whatever) desktop OS users, you can also target the server OSes with little of no modifications to your exploit. But what can I say, combining the OSes DID bring a better OS to the desktop user.
The root of the problem... complacent or downright incompetent or un-qualified system administrators. Not unlike the advent of platters and automations which led to concession staff and ushers running projection booths, Microsoft has developed a server OS that has unfortunately led to the company's receptionist, or even idiot QC guy, running the company's server OSes.
Just wait, I guarantee that as Redhat and others make their server OSes more and more user friendly and graphically pretty, there will be more and more unqualified network administrators running Linux based networks (desktops, workstations and servers included) that are full of security holes which are exploited as much as Microsoft's OSes are today.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|