my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » New Movies in B&W (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: New Movies in B&W Manny Knowles "What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???" Posts: 4247 From: Bloomington, IN, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 01-20-2004 10:07 PM                     In your opinion, is there room for black-and-white cinematography today? I'm particularly interested in knowing how many people would avoid seeing a movie if it was filmed in B&W.  |  IP: Logged Evans A Criswell Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1579 From: Huntsville, AL, USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 01-20-2004 10:49 PM                        Some people might avoid a movie if it was totally in black and white, but more serious movie-lovers probably would not. In recent years, I can think of two movies I enjoyed, one of which was totally black and white, and one which used the black and white to color transition very well. The first movie was "Clerks" and the second was "Pleasantville".  |  IP: Logged Ken Layton Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1452 From: Olympia, Wash. USA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 01-20-2004 10:57 PM                     I like black & white movies, but not when they are printed on color stock!  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 01-21-2004 12:05 AM                     IMHO, one of the requirements of being a real film fan is enjoying black and white movies. B&W cinematography has a completely different style and in some ways can make a story feel more intimate or immediate. To answer the question, yes, B&W is still relevant for filmmaking today. It evokes a visual style which certainly helps the feel of "indie" type films (only with the exeption that B&W movies need to be shot on film --B&W shot on videotape looks like shit). I agree with Ken about the practice of printing B&W movies on color stock being a mistake. It tarnishes the high contrast look. Colorizing B&W movies is way wrong. Exposure methods are different for color and B&W film (you set exposures for the lightest areas in color whereas you expose for the darks in B&W). So the process just never looks convincing. I really can't imagine films like "Citizen Kane," "Raging Bull" or even indie cult hits like "Man Bites Dog" being shot in color.  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 01-21-2004 04:13 AM                        I'm with Ken! It's too bad that quality B&W lab work is so rare right now, except at places like Alpha Cine and Du Art.  |  IP: Logged Michael Schaffer "Where is the Boardwalk Hotel?" Posts: 4143 From: Boston, MA Registered: Apr 2002 posted 01-21-2004 05:39 AM                        We screened "Coffee and Cigarettes" by Jim Jarmusch a little while ago for a studio delegation. I understand it has been shown on some film festivals, but don`t know if it is scheduled for wider release soon (or if that has already taken place without me noticing it). Anyway, the movie is shot entirely in B&W (some 16, some 35) and also printed on B&W stock. Which reminds me that a number of Jarmusch` films were shot in B&W. Hey, wait a second - "Man Bites Dog" was actually shown in the US???  |  IP: Logged Jeff Stricker Master Film Handler Posts: 481 From: Calumet, Mi USA Registered: Nov 1999 posted 01-21-2004 06:06 AM                     Absolutely! B&W photography, be it cinema or still photos and the right story to tell, can provide an ambiance that can't be done in color. I wouldn't advocate doing LOTR in B&W, but I sure can't imagine a film like "Shindler's List" or "The Hustler" in anything but B&W.  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 01-21-2004 09:30 AM                        Nothing quite matches the "look" of a silver image B&W print of a B&W film with excellent cinematography. That's why Kodak continues to invest in improving and providing a full line of B&W motion picture film products: Kodak B&W Camera Films Kodak B&W Print Film (ESTAR base) Kodak B&W Print Film (triacetate base) Kodak film for B&W master positives Kodak film for B&W duplicate negatives Just a word of caution that B&W silver image prints are more sensitive to heat-related projection issues, as they absorb both visible and infrared radiant energy, whereas color dyes absorb mostly only visible light. So proper lamp alignment (no hot-spotting) and heat filters are important, especially on large screens (high power levels): Heat Damage, Part 1 Heat Damage, Part 2 Color print film can produce reasonably neutral images from B&W negatives, and is sometimes chosen for very large releases, or when B&W and color images need to be intercut. Intercutting silver image B&W and dye image color prints can be problematic for focus shifting, as the films absorb different amounts of energy.  |  IP: Logged Manny Knowles "What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???" Posts: 4247 From: Bloomington, IN, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 01-21-2004 09:35 AM                     Is it true that the color segments were lab-spliced into each and every release print of "Schindler's List" or was that movie printed onto color stock?  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 01-21-2004 09:45 AM                        "Schindler's List" had both intercut prints (silver image B&W intercut with color print) and entire prints on EASTMAN Color Print Film. The intercut prints did have the expected focus shift issues in some theatres. Some prints required additional lubrication to reduce projector abrasion, per SMPTE Recommended Practice RP151. I wrote two articles about some of the issues in Kodak's "Film Notes for Reel People": http://www.film-tech.com/manuals/H5033.pdf http://www.film-tech.com/manuals/H5034.pdf  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 01-21-2004 11:11 AM                     We had no focus issue at Northpark on our intercut show print on Century JJs. (I still remember it was print #8.) However across town another theater I was working at the time picked up that very print the day after Northpark lost it and we couldn't keep focus to save our lives during those intercut segments on the Simplexes with straight gates. After the second or third day everyone just gave up and let the color segments run blurry. I saw a couple of the prints on color stock around town and they looked like  |  IP: Logged Bill Gabel Film God Posts: 3873 From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA Registered: Jan 2002 posted 01-21-2004 12:13 PM                     The prints I opened with were the intercut showprints at GCC Sherman Oaks 5 in Sherman Oaks, California. We had three screens running the picture. The main house had no problems, but the triplex across the street had the focus problems. All three house had Century SA projectors. The main house was a 4K and the others were 2K christie consoles. When the color intercuts hit in the triplex they would go out of focus. I think the first color is about 90 minutes to 2 hours into the picture. Universal just kept sending prints from Technicolor over to the theatre for the next few days for a total of 9 prints. The main house had a water cooled gate and the others were not. The problem was that after 2 hours the gate got so hot that when the color intercuts hit it, because of the different stock it would kick it out of focus and go right back into focus with the B&W stock again. On the TAP sheets it gave out the wrong info about the movie setup. And they sent people around to coat the film with Tomacoat. I spent one LONG week opening this picture.  |  IP: Logged Manny Knowles "What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???" Posts: 4247 From: Bloomington, IN, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 01-21-2004 02:15 PM                     Actually, I recall one of the very first shots being in color. A brief shot of a match (or candle) being lit? It's been a while since I saw "Schindler's List." Perhaps I ought to sign up for it on Amazon. Thanks for the input thus far! The reason for my initial question is that I may be fortunate enough to originate my 2nd feature on film. Initially, I had imagined it being in B&W but that idea went away when I started working in video. (I agree with those who say that video doesn't work in B&W.) Now that I am once again investigating the possibility of shooting on film, I find myself revisiting the 'color vs Black-and-White' issue. My "gut" tells me that this particular film would work very well in B&W but I won't decide until after some tests have been completed. In the meantime, I would appreciate if you would now spend a while talking about some of your favorite Black-and-White movies. I am most interested in the visual aesthetics of the medium but it would help if the movie itself tells an interesting story. Movies I have seen and plan to watch again very soon: THE NIGHT OF THE HUNTER THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE SCHINDLER'S LIST THE LAST PICTURE SHOW PSYCHO CITIZEN KANE PLEASANTVILLE  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 01-21-2004 02:28 PM                        Try to see one of the new prints of "The Third Man" which were struck a few years ago (1999?). That film looks absolutely stunning and whatever lab made the prints did a terriffic job. Keep in mind that Pleasantville was shot on color neg and printed on color stock with the colors desaturated. I don't like the look as much as that of a true B&W print from silver B&W negative, but it was definitely far less grainy. One downside to B&W is that 35mm blowups from 16mm never seem to look very good, whereas blowups from color neg can look spectacular. For some reason, blowups just look way too grainy and unsharp in B&W.  |  IP: Logged Manny Knowles "What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???" Posts: 4247 From: Bloomington, IN, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 01-21-2004 02:41 PM                     Thanks for the info on PLEASANTVILLE -- I figured that it had to be printed on color stock since the colors are eventually (re)introduced as the plot progresses. What about THE MAN WHO WASN'T THERE? Any truth to the rumor that it was filmed in color because some markets would not accept it in Black-and-White? Will see if I can get hands on actual film prints of these movies, including THE THIRD MAN.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.