Topic Closed

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Should we BAN Thomas Procyk? Vote here! (Page 1)

This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3

Author Topic: Should we BAN Thomas Procyk? Vote here! Joe Redifer You need a beating today Posts: 12859 From: Denver, Colorado Registered: May 99 posted 02-05-2004 05:08 PM                        Thomas is annoying. Look at all of the useless threads he has resurrected. Should we ban him? Cast your vote. Yes or no. "No" votes will not be counted. YES  |  IP: Logged Daryl C. W. O'Shea Film God Posts: 3977 From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from) Registered: Jun 2002 posted 02-05-2004 05:09 PM                        I  |  IP: Logged Adam Martin I'm not even gonna point out the irony. Posts: 3686 From: Dallas, TX Registered: Nov 2000 posted 02-05-2004 05:10 PM                     Absolutely. I spend enough time moderating already.  |  IP: Logged Phil Hill I love my cootie bug Posts: 7595 From: Hollywood, CA USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 02-05-2004 05:13 PM                  Yup! Plus a few others I can think of... myself included! >>> Phil  |  IP: Logged Daryl C. W. O'Shea Film God Posts: 3977 From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from) Registered: Jun 2002 posted 02-05-2004 05:14 PM                        Lets ban everyone and go pirate some movies.  |  IP: Logged Phil Hill I love my cootie bug Posts: 7595 From: Hollywood, CA USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 02-05-2004 05:23 PM                  Damn! Adam is hot today! He's a closer! >>> Phil  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-05-2004 05:41 PM                     He really should be convicted and serve time, at least 90 days, in the Filmguard Penetentary. 30 days mixing up hot batches of Filmguard solution then 30 days bottling them and then 30 days at Phils house bike riding in the canyons. If he survives the L.A. canyons he should then be released and his whereabouts remotely monitored by Daryl O'Shea 24 hours a day so we know what he's up to 24 hours a day. While we're at it Joe should have to jog next to him while he's biking in the canyon! Mark  |  IP: Logged Mike Heenan Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1896 From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 02-05-2004 08:12 PM                     I vote we all chip in a few bucks each and send him to the Bunny Ranch!  |  IP: Logged Jason Black Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1723 From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA Registered: Nov 2000 posted 02-05-2004 08:32 PM                        I'll vote for the ban.. And I'm not sure that sending him to the Bunny Ranch would do any good....  |  IP: Logged Manny Knowles "What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???" Posts: 4247 From: Bloomington, IN, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 02-05-2004 08:55 PM                     Ban his aging ass!  |  IP: Logged Evans A Criswell Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1579 From: Huntsville, AL, USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 02-05-2004 11:49 PM                        I vote no multiplied by A(999, 999), where A is the Ackermann function: 1. If x = 0 then A(x, y) = y + 1 2. If y = 0 then A(x, y) = A(x-1, 1) 3. Otherwise, A(x, y) = A(x-1, A(x, y-1)) That should be more than enough to cancel most yes votes.  |  IP: Logged Daryl C. W. O'Shea Film God Posts: 3977 From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from) Registered: Jun 2002 posted 02-06-2004 12:00 AM                        Luckily the server will crash before it finishes that calculation, so at best, you'll just get some bogus memory address... so the yes's may just win. That and we're not counting no's.  |  IP: Logged Rachel Craven Madam Moderator Posts: 2190 From: Pensacola, FL Registered: Dec 2000 posted 02-06-2004 12:19 AM                     Nah, I'll stick up for ol' Tommy - only cause I feel pity though.  |  IP: Logged Dave Williams Wet nipple scene Posts: 1836 From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA Registered: Jan 2000 posted 02-06-2004 12:20 AM                        I vote that he be forced to watch the republican convention with a smile duct taped to his face and his eyelids sewn open. If we can get him to vote Bush in 04, then I am sure all will be right with the world. Dave  |  IP: Logged Aaron Garman Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1470 From: Toledo, OH USA Registered: Mar 2003 posted 02-06-2004 02:24 AM                     I don't know you Tom, but you seem like the underdog so I'll vote not to ban you. Let's hope I've made the right choice...the future could depend on it. AJG  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.