my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Howard Stern Banned -- Creativity is a dangerous thing... (Page 1)

This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3

Author Topic: Howard Stern Banned -- Creativity is a dangerous thing... Thomas Procyk Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1842 From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 02-26-2004 11:34 AM                     Yahoo News Link Howard Stern Dropped from Clear Channel Stations LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Radio station giant Clear Channel Communications Inc. said on Wednesday it was dumping nationally syndicated shock jock Howard Stern from its stations under a new "zero tolerance" policy toward indecency. In dropping Stern from its six radio outlets that carry his show, Clear Channel cited his interview on Tuesday with Rick Salomon, the man who was filmed having sex with hotel heiress and TV reality star Paris Hilton in a video widely distributed on Internet porn sites. According to a transcript of the show released by San Antonio, Texas-based Clear Channel, Stern asked Salomon if he engaged in anal sex and referred to the size of his penis. Using a racist term, a caller to the show asked Solomon if he had ever had sex with any famous black women. The action against Stern came a day after Clear Channel fired Florida radio personality "Bubba the Love Sponge," after federal regulators accused him of airing sexually graphic material on Tampa's WXTB-FM and three other Florida stations. Stern's New York-based show is syndicated by Infinity Broadcasting, a unit of Viacom Inc., which also owns television networks CBS and MTV. Infinity operates 185 radio stations nationwide. A spokesman for Infinity was not immediately available for comment and a Viacom spokesman declined comment. Neither Stern's agent nor producers of his show were immediately available for comment. Viacom president Mel Karmazin reportedly has imposed a crackdown on sexually explicit material on Infinity stations, declaring in a recent company-wide conference call: "This company won't be a poster child for indecency." But it was unclear what impact, if any, such an admonition would have on Stern, who has long defied federal regulators and spawned countless imitators with a ribald show featuring porn stars and strippers and bits like "Lesbian Dial-a-Date." 'ZERO TOLERANCE' The action against the self-proclaimed "King of All Media" came after Clear Channel announced what Chief Operating Officer Mark Mays called a "zero tolerance" policy toward material deemed in violation of federal broadcast decency standards. "Clear Channel drew a line in the sand today with regard to protecting our listeners from indecent content, and Howard Stern's show blew right through it," Clear Channel Radio president John Hogan said in a statement. "It was vulgar, offensive and insulting, not just to women and African Americans but to anyone with a sense of common decency." The San Antonio-based company, the largest U.S. radio station operator with more than 1,200 outlets, said it will amend contracts with all on-air personalities to hold disc jockeys financially responsible for indecent comments on-air. The Stern show was carried by Clear Channel stations in six markets -- Fort Lauderdale, Rochester, Orlando, San Diego, Pittsburgh, and Louisville. The policy changes are the latest taken by broadcasters to address decency concerns following the Feb. 1 CBS telecast of the Super Bowl half-time show, when pop diva Janet Jackson's right breast was exposed on live television. Said Hogan: "If a DJ is found to be in violation of FCC (news - web sites) rules, there will be no appeals and no intermediate steps. If they break the law by broadcasting indecent material, they will not work for Clear Channel." Hogan and other broadcast executives are slated to testify Thursday before Congress about broadcast standards. Gordon Hodge, a media analyst with Thomas Weisel, said he doubted the move would have much financial impact on Clear Channel, given that it carried Stern's show in just six markets, and added "He's obviously a very popular personality. I can't image that Infinity would take him off the air." He predicted that other stations in the six markets would pick up Stern's program. "It would be quite profitable (for a smaller company), he said. Clear Channel's share price closed on Wednesday 52 cents higher on the New York Stock Exchange (news - web sites) AT $43.44. (Additional reporting by Jonathan Stempel and Jeremy Pelofsky in New York and Sue Zeidler in Los Angeles) ------------- With Clear Channel out there "protecting" us from all of this evil on the airwaves, why do we even need a defense department? This is exactly what happens when you let CLEARLY monopolistic companies (Viacom and Clear Channel) control the majority of what we see and hear. THEY get to decide what's in the "best interest" of "everyone". News flash: You can't please all of the people all the time. That's why local radio stations USED TO HAVE VARIETY before Clear Channel came along... NO ONE wants to hear the SAME, STANDARDIZED stuff... that's how you get lame policies like this. I just saw a top Clear Channel executive on the news at a press conference saying he is "Embarrased to be associated" with a company that carried "bubba the love sponge" and that "As a parent of a nine year old girl, I want to make sure she and ALL of our listeners are protected from indecent material." How much clearer can it be that CLEAR CHANNEL TAILORS THEIR STATIONS FOR NINE YEAR OLD GIRLS!!! Maybe someone should drive over to his house and show him what it takes to REALLY harm children... Children are dumb. I say everyone stops procreating right now. And for all the nay-sayers who claimed that the monopilization and consolidation of radio stations by a single entity wouldn't cause corporate censorship of entertainment or information, then here's your proof. I hope you're happy. And if there's anything that a Zero Tolerance policy should be enacted for, it's for Zero Tolerance policies themselves. They go against the very justice system of the country, dictating a unilateral consequence for an action regardless of any exceptional conditions or extenuating circumstances that may arise. =TMP= - big link shortened [ 02-26-2004, 07:23 PM: Message edited by: Daryl C. W. O'Shea ]  |  IP: Logged Darryl Spicer Film God Posts: 3250 From: Lexington, KY, USA Registered: Dec 2000 posted 02-26-2004 11:45 AM                    So does that mean that all Clear Channel radio stations will no longer play AC/DC songs? Shoot to Thrill, You Shook Me All Night Long and many others feature sexually related material.  |  IP: Logged Aaron Sisemore Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day! Posts: 3061 From: Rockwall TX USA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 02-26-2004 12:01 PM                     quote: That's why local radio stations USED TO HAVE VARIETY before Clear Channel came along.. Thats a load of bullshit. Can you say 'RKO General'?? Their stations played quite a variety of stuff in their playlists. They were considered a 'huge controlling, monopolistic corporation' (almost if not more so than ClearChannel is today) and were broken up in 1986 by the government. The problem isn't that the 'corporations' are controlling the playlists, it is the [mainstream] music industry is putting out nothing but CRAP, and people are buying it, thus the stations are playing it. I like Howard Stern. I LOVED his books (and Robin Quivers' book too), I loved the movie. His show, however, used to be side-splittingly funny, but it has lost its appeal with me, as all it is now is the same old schtick and his obsession with 'crossing the line' or 'how much of this can I get away with' attitude. I see that Viacom is finally beginning to feel the sting of the Super Bowl backlash and is trying to rein in their more colorful characters... I know there are a lot of people out there both in and out of radio that HATE ClearChannel with a passion, but as stated before it isn't really CC's fault here. My .02 -Aaron  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-26-2004 12:32 PM                        This'll be just the career boost Howard Stern needs. Maybe now he'll get that "Fartman" movie made.  |  IP: Logged Eric Hooper Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 532 From: Fort Worth, TX, USA Registered: May 2003 posted 02-26-2004 12:52 PM                     "Gangsta" rap is played on many Clear Channel stations here in SF. Are they gonna ban that as well? There'll be nothing left on the airwaves to listen to and everyone will get an XM Satelite Radio...  |  IP: Logged Mitchell Dvoskin Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1869 From: West Milford, NJ, USA Registered: Jan 2001 posted 02-26-2004 01:44 PM                     1. Clear Channel is not protecting us from indecent material. They are protecting themselves from hostile government officials that we, the public, elected to represent us. If large segments of the public did not care, the politicians would not care. If the politicians did not care, Clear Channel would not care. 2. Broadcast media stations in the country are not public forums beyond having to give equal time for political candidates. They are private businesses that have the right to control what they broadcast. This is not censorship. This is editorial control. /Mitchell  |  IP: Logged Randy Stankey Film God Posts: 6539 From: Erie, Pennsylvania Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-26-2004 02:36 PM                     I guess I have two things to say about it: 1) THIS is what the fallout from Janet Jackson showing her tit(s) on TV is going to be? Stupid! Janet Jackson, Justin Timberfake and their producers should be liable for the fines and that should be the end of it. Period. Now we have every company that wants to give themselves a PR boost coming out with yet ANOTHER "Zero Tolerance Policy" about something. Drugs... Violence in the Workplace... Sexual Harrassment... What next? It's all bullshit anyway! Nothing more than an attempt to whitewash their corporate image and protect themselves from some imaginary lawsuit. Nothing will ever come of it. Nothing ever does. It'll all blow over in a couple of years and everything will be back to normal. 2) Honestly, I'm getting tired of Howard Stern. He's "over"... So "15 minutes ago"! There's only so much "shock" to go around. After a while it's the same old thing. There's no such thing as "uping the ante" or "pushing the envelope" anymore. If he wanted to continue that old saw, what would he do next? Put live kittens into a meat grinder? It's POINTLESS and GROSS! (The kitten thing is a gedanken experiment.) There was a time when Howard's antics were funny in a "You can't say THAT on the radio!" kind of way. Nowadays, it's all been done before. It's just the same-old-same-old. I'm tired of it. Besides, Howard is annoying! He won't shut up and let his guests talk without trying to interject some rude comment like, "Have you ever boinked a black guy?" or "How big is his penis?" A stripper is a stripper is a stripper. A naked lesbian is... well... naked... and she has sex with other women. BORING! It's time for Howard to get the hell off the airwaves and give somebody ELSE a chance to come up with a new idea. OR, maybe he could produce. (Maybe not!) Oh, yeah! One more thing. Get a haircut. That hairstyle went out with the 80's! (Unless you're a hardcore geek.)  |  IP: Logged David Favel Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 764 From: Ashburton, New Zealand Registered: Feb 2002 posted 02-26-2004 04:46 PM                     If you are tuning into his show then you have a fair idea what you are going to here. If it offends you, listen to someone else. On a side note, MTV have rescheduled their more offensive material from latenite to anywhere the hell they want, as requested by their watchers. Again it was a "Storm in a C cup"  |  IP: Logged Mark J. Marshall Film God Posts: 3188 From: New Castle, DE, USA Registered: Aug 2002 posted 02-26-2004 05:12 PM                    Clear Channel's decision has nothing to do with censorship. And it has nothing to do with marketing to 9 year old girls. It has everything to do with personal responsibility. And they have every right to decide what they will and will not be associated with. That's my opinion of course. Feel free to disagree.  |  IP: Logged Bruce Hansen Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 847 From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 02-26-2004 05:40 PM                     Zero tolerance translates to zero thinking. We need MORE thinking in this country, not less. Too many people in this country engage in mindless knee-jerk reactions. FCC regs. are not all that cut and dry (on this subject).  |  IP: Logged Paul G. Thompson The Weenie Man Posts: 4718 From: Mount Vernon WA USA Registered: Nov 2000 posted 02-26-2004 06:00 PM                     The radio station ratings will drop. It has been known for years that if the station's ratings want to be high, all they have to do is switch to the talk format and put more assholes on the air.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 02-26-2004 06:00 PM                     IMHO, "Corporate America" and the American public in general really don't have a clue on what truly qualifies as "morality." It takes something besides bleeping out curse words and fuzzing out video of naked body parts to make something morally decent. I'll tell you what offends me: dishonorable action. Violence, cruelty, selfishness, indifference, prejudice and uncontrolled greed are all actions I deem far worse than a four letter expletive. Yet our screwed up society seems to think a lot of those things are perfectly okay. Any broadcast TV network taking ad money for penis hardening pills has no right to cry about incidents such as a singer showing her breast on their show. The network made the show off limits for kids with the first check they took for a Viagara ad. I enjoyed listening to Howard Stern's radio show on K-Rock back in my New York college days. But the appeal wore off when the show just turned into a forum for strippers to shave their pubic areas near a microphone. It's my opinion his TV show on "E" is crap, and that cable channel on the whole is crap.  |  IP: Logged Paul G. Thompson The Weenie Man Posts: 4718 From: Mount Vernon WA USA Registered: Nov 2000 posted 02-26-2004 06:18 PM                     Bobby mentioned: quote: I'll tell you what offends me: dishonorable action. Violence, cruelty, selfishness, indifference, prejudice and uncontrolled greed are all actions I deem far worse than a four letter expletive. Yet our screwed up society seems to think a lot of those things are perfectly okay. Right on, Bobby.  |  IP: Logged Will Kutler Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1506 From: Tucson, AZ, USA Registered: Feb 2001 posted 02-26-2004 06:27 PM                     As a Jew, I am deeply ashamed of CRAP Like "Stern" and "Rosanne", who "claim" to be representatives of the Jewish community! America was a heaven for my grandparents, who escaped Eastern Europe. As a veteran, I am still DEEPLY ashamed of "Rosanne's" National Anthem fiasco! If "Rosanne" reads this post, or if anyone knows her, I invite her to come look for me! I would cherish the opportunity to publicly KICK HER ASS! "Stern" is usless crap who should not be on the air. I also saw one of "Stern's" episodes where he was openly descrating Jewish religous symbols! Although I do believe in our Bill Of Rights, and believe in free speech, there is still something called: DECORUM! "Stern" needs a good old fashioned ASSWHOPPIN! Give him a haircut, make him take a daily shower (not yearly) and WASH HIS MOUTH OUT WITH SOAP!  |  IP: Logged Robert E. Allen Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1078 From: Checotah, Oklahoma Registered: Jul 2002 posted 02-26-2004 07:01 PM                     quote: "Zero tolerance translates to zero thinking. We need MORE thinking in this country, not less. Too many people in this country engage in mindless knee-jerk reactions." It does not take any "thinking" to be vulgar and suggestive. In fact, I suspect Stern and his cronies have little in the way of education and really don't know how to use the English language or be "entertaining" or "creative" without resorting to toilet humor, something the entertainment industry in this country already has far too much of and is exporting all over the world. We'd be better off exporting Stern and the like. - String of dashes removed and a proper quote tag inserted to stop the barrage of emails. [ 02-26-2004, 07:21 PM: Message edited by: Daryl C. W. O'Shea ]  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.