Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Documentary film makers – where are you ? Why not one on 'Gay Marriages' ?

   
Author Topic: Documentary film makers – where are you ? Why not one on 'Gay Marriages' ?
Kamakshipalya Dhananjay
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 190
From: Bangalore, India
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 03-02-2004 08:19 AM      Profile for Kamakshipalya Dhananjay   Email Kamakshipalya Dhananjay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Documentary films' industry has seen buoyed success in recent years. A number of innovatively themed and thought provoking films have come and so too have the audience been more willing to prefer these over regular films, in increasing numbers.

But one complaint has always been that documentary filmmakers do not have a sense of timing. That is, they produce films on topics long after such topics have ceased to engage the minds of the people or of the policy makers. If documentaries ever strived to or even pretend to offer information or insight on topics they tackle, then their utility is entirely tied to whether they are on 'time'. If not, they are another source of passable entertainment at our Multiplexes.

One issue that is exploding within the American people is the issue of 'Gay Marriages'. Raging over several weeks and likely poised to become one of the biggest, if not the biggest itself, issue this election year. The turn of events across the US, so far and in the next few weeks or months, is anything but predictable or its ramifications well containable to news stories, television talk shows or Congress debates.

Now, am I suggesting that somebody should come along, make a documentary film on 'Gay Marriage' for the ensuing season, make a killing at the Box office and then, disappear into the dark ?

Absolutely Not. Never.

All I am about to say is – a documentary may very well be made on the topic of 'Gay Marriages' in the future. That is, next year or in one of many ahead. Who knows, such a film may even be honored with a nomination or an award at the Academy.

But, is not the time right Now ?

What impact or utility may a documentary have if it is neither current nor relevant to the time it is seen in ?

While recognizing that producing a documentary may often be more difficult or time consuming than even to put together a promising blockbuster, I wish to ask, 'Should not a documentary on Gay Marriages come sooner?'

This summer ? To provide a perspective right at the time the nation is expected to reflect on this issue ?

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-02-2004 08:55 AM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The real problem with your suggestion is that the issue is not yet resolved. A documentary would have no resolution and just be ambiguous at best. Chances are someone is already afoot on such a project, however it takes many years to see any kind of documentary project to see the light of day.

Documentaries often take many years to film, as no script is readily available. Especially when doing one of current topics and times. Lots of film is expended and time in the editing room is plentiful.

However, be careful. Let's keep this subject on documentaries in general, and not wander into any political discussion on the pros and cons of gay marraige. We should stray away from that with a cold hard vengeance! [thumbsup]

Ciao

dave

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-02-2004 09:35 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
On the subject of gay marriages, this article gave me a giggle: a rehearsal for a 'straight' marriage in which a male 'actor' stood in for the bride attracted the interest of the authorities, who got the wrong end of the stick, so to speak. Problem - this happened in Saudi Arabia!

quote:
Saudis quiz 'gay wedding' guests

Saudi investigators are grilling some 50 people for allegedly attending a gay wedding in the city of Medina, a newspaper reported on Monday. The suspects deny they were attending a gay marriage and say they took part in a ceremony to mark the wedding of a Chadian friend, Arab News said.

The accused Chadian told the police he was rehearsing for his legal marriage, which was planned for last Friday. The incident has shocked Saudi Arabia, where gay marriage is banned.

An initial newspaper report last Friday claimed that police arrested guests at the wedding of an all-male couple from Chad. Police raided a rest house where the ceremony was under way after advice from the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, or religious police, Arab News reported.

Investigators say that invitations to last Wednesday's ceremony indicated it was a gay function and point to the suspicious behaviour of guests. They fled the venue at the sight of police cars and left some 30 vehicles behind, according to security sources. But one of the two Chadians involved told the police that he was rehearsing for his legal marriage, to be held at a wedding hall last Friday. His Saudi sponsor confirmed the man's story and said he had given him money to meet the marriage expenses.

Link to story.

Not the ideal place to make that mistake!

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 03-02-2004 11:06 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice

Hahaha That's great!

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 03-02-2004 04:04 PM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
But one complaint has always been that documentary filmmakers do not have a sense of timing. That is, they produce films on topics long after such topics have ceased to engage the minds of the people or of the policy makers.
Sure they may produce the final product after the topic has seen its first time in the public spotlight, but it doesn't mean that the project hasn't been in motion for quite some time.

You're not saying that documentary film makers need to develop their sense of timing, yet develop their skills as a prophet, foreseeing the future so that they can have a documentary on it, on time.

quote:
If documentaries ever strived to or even pretend to offer information or insight on topics they tackle, then their utility is entirely tied to whether they are on 'time'. If not, they are another source of passable entertainment at our Multiplexes.
I disagree. Any worthwhile topic is never a one-time event, that requires no further thought. Everything is revisited at some point, by someone, again and again.

Even if something was never to be revisited again, the documentary still serves its purpose as a way of, you guessed it, documenting events in history. Some people claim that documentaries aren't very good accounts of history since they are influenced by the makers of the documentary. However, every other traditional historical account is coloured just as much by its writer(s), or story teller(s).

Further, documentaries are just that. Documents of history from the perspective of an observer (the makers). If you were to complete a documentary in time for it to be exhibited while the topic subject is still unfolding or has just completed unfolding, it wouldn't be a documentary but propaganda.

quote:
One issue that is exploding within the American people is the issue of 'Gay Marriages'. Raging over several weeks and likely poised to become one of the biggest, if not the biggest itself, issue this election year. The turn of events across the US, so far and in the next few weeks or months, is anything but predictable or its ramifications well containable to news stories, television talk shows or Congress debates.
Sure, it's been a popular topic over the last few weeks, but it has been by no stretch the first time it has been a popular topic, or even close to it. Nor will it be the last time. Whether someone were to produce a documentary on the topic today or two years from now, it would still be a worthwhile endevour that would be more than merely entertainment at your local plex.

quote:
All I am about to say is – a documentary may very well be made on the topic of 'Gay Marriages' in the future. That is, next year or in one of many ahead. Who knows, such a film may even be honored with a nomination or an award at the Academy.
Wow, what a prediction. Heck, there have already been documentaries on the topic, surely there will be more.

quote:
But, is not the time right Now ?
Once again, I believe timing has more to due with economic potential rather than utility or value.

quote:
What impact or utility may a documentary have if it is neither current nor relevant to the time it is seen in ?
To the narrow minded, not much I suppose. However, documentaries don't need to be on time as you continue to stress. That's what the nightly news is for.

quote:
While recognizing that producing a documentary may often be more difficult or time consuming than even to put together a promising blockbuster, I wish to ask, 'Should not a documentary on Gay Marriages come sooner?'
Once again, there have been documentaries made in the past. I've seen some on TLC and the History channel. Unfortunately I can't recall any titles. Perhaps someone else knows.

quote:
This summer ? To provide a perspective right at the time the nation is expected to reflect on this issue ?
Now that is totally unrealistic unless, of course, you are a participant in the New York City Midnight Moviemaking Madness contest and like to finish editing your project in the taxi cab on the way to the lab.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-02-2004 04:44 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Besides the problems that Dave and Daryl have said. Documentary film makers sometimes make these film from their own money, hoping someone will pick the project up for release. Timing is not the main problem. It's the funding to make the documentaries. Like that Projectionist documentary "Behind the Glass", has been filming for since sometime last year. They just got a grant to help in funding the project. A lot of the budgets of these films are eaten up by equipment and post-production rentals.

 |  IP: Logged

Eric Hooper
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 532
From: Fort Worth, TX, USA
Registered: May 2003


 - posted 03-02-2004 11:56 PM      Profile for Eric Hooper   Email Eric Hooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Go to any Gay and Lesbian Film Festival and I'm sure you will see plenty of documentries in the film programming already made on the subject...

 |  IP: Logged

Kamakshipalya Dhananjay
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 190
From: Bangalore, India
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 03-03-2004 02:30 AM      Profile for Kamakshipalya Dhananjay   Email Kamakshipalya Dhananjay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well,

1.Take 'Bowling for Columbine'. This documentary is not the only one on the topic of Gun/weapon proliferation in America. Yet, there are factors that render this one to stand out from the rest. So, not all documentaries are created equal. Some stand out while the rest fade into oblivion. So, I never asked anybody to give a start by first venturing to make a documentary on the subject of 'Gay Marriages'.

2.As to documentaries that are made for or are screened in the Gay and Lesbian film festivals, it may safely be said that they are not really made for the mainstream audience. They are made more for the enthusiasts that flock to the Gay and Lesbian film festivals.

3.Are people here saying that a documentary on the subject of 'Gay marriages' cannot be made to rank as a professional and an extensive delve into the subject matter, muck like are titles 'Fog of War' or 'Bowling for Columbine'. Or even that any documentary on the subject of 'Gay Marriages' cannot be made on a emotional canvas as wide as covered by films such as 'Touching the void' ?

Just consider some of the disciplines that have to be touched merely to give any semblance of professionality to such a documentary on 'Gay Marriages' – Evolutionary biology, anthropology, geo-political history, contemporary psychology, modern genetics, comparitive and contemporary Sociology, Socio-political legislative history, legal jurisprudence, religion (comparitive, contemporary and historical adaptation), current state of marriage legislation (jurisdiction centric) and cultural factors that influence the formation and sustenance of marriage to state a mere few. A thousand other disciplines will need to be touched to make a documentary that will stake claim to a wider audience than is presently served by what has come before.

4.As to timing being not that important except for economic reasons, I wonder if we are required to look down on a documentary that is made with any expectation of monetary returns at the Box office ?

5.That Box office returns for documentaries have steadily been growing over the past few years, are documentary makers required to wear a blind mask to the Box office potential of their works, or be disorganized or detached from Commercially motivated organizations/studios ?

6.What if a studio were to, sensing the opportunity that lies ahead, finance a documentary on such subjects ? Would that be good enough to call them as becoming untrue to their tradition ? Who is to delimit the sphere of activity of any other ? Who is also to allot the scale of ambition for another's works ?

Are 'Gay Marriages' all there is to end a grand documentary ambition with ? What about other subjects as 'Genetically modified foods', 'the dilemma of cloning', 'food supply chain in the world', 'ever rising hunger in the good old parts of the world' and many more ?

There can be no denying of the dis-organised state of the 'documentary film industry' at present. It merits such observation as long as they are not motivated or are constrained from doing things at a time that would yield greater economic returns. Anybody who will trace the rise of independent cinema in America will surely notice that definite parallels may be drawn between the earlier stages of speciality/independent cinema and the state of the documentary film industry at present.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 03-03-2004 04:39 AM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn`t it illegal in your country to even show a kiss on screen? And now you are wondering when documentaries about gay marriages are coming out (pun intended)?

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 03-03-2004 04:57 AM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
First of all, why is this even in Ground Level? Documentary film makers generally don't run the ground floor of theatres... moving to Yak.

Second, the subject matter of Bowling for Columbine isn't exactly a new topic. People have debated gun laws since before either of us were born. It would have made just as much money if it had came out this year, or ten years from now. In any case, the film was an exception to the norm. Nothing wrong being an exception to the norm, but an exception it is.

Third, I never said (and I don't believe anyone else did either) that documentaries that make money are inherently evil, or unworthy of the 'documentary' classification. That's absurd and you know it. The reality is, however, that the majority of documentaries aren't made in expectation of a substantial financial return.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Price
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1714
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-03-2004 01:27 PM      Profile for Ian Price   Email Ian Price   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My theatre runs a Gay Man's Film night once per month.

My business partner is proudly gay and will run any worthy film on the subject. The only film festival he regularly attends is the San Francisco International Lesbian and Gay Film Festival; he's a Gold Card Member.

I'm sure there will be documentaries about the Gay Wedding phenomena in the United States. Most Documentaries take years to make. There is usually zero funding for documentaries.

Regular movie theatres hardly ever run documentaries. But our theatre almost always has a documentary playing or coming soon. Right now we have Errol Morris' Fog of War.

Most Documentaries are shot on video these days and play on television.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-03-2004 02:12 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why not make a feature film about this instead? Given his recent interest in the issue, Arnold Schwarzenegger could star as the 'bride'...

 |  IP: Logged

Carl Martin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1424
From: Oakland, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-03-2004 04:01 PM      Profile for Carl Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Carl Martin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
he's already played an expectant mother....

carl

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.