my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » "DarbeeVision" and Robert Altman

Author Topic: "DarbeeVision" and Robert Altman Christian Appelt Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 505 From: Frankfurt, Germany Registered: Dec 2001 posted 05-17-2004 03:54 PM                     Just saw Robert Altman's THE COMPANY. Everybody knows that Mr. Altman loves diffused pictures and does not care about sharp images, but something bothered me about this 'scope print. During backstage scenes and a pan outside a church, typical video artifacts could be seen. Bright lights shining into the lens became flat color forms, and every scene with Altman's beloved backlight/diffusion technique looked just terrible. Colours looked really bad when great contrast differences appeared, and the whole picture had a soft & fuzzy look. Now in the credits it said "processed with DARBEEVISION". Mr. Altman has shot THE COMPANY in HiDefinition video and processed it with that "DarbeeVisioN" filter system which is said to give the image a three-dimensional appearance and enhance sharpness. The company's website cannot be reached presently, and Mr. Altman speaks about how DarbeeVision is "like taking off your glasses". About as true as the claims of CinemaScope being 3-D without glasses. THE COMPANY will strain your eyes even on medium sized screens, and it proves nothing except that HiDefinition can be made to look just a little worse than shitty Super-35. Darbeevision  |  IP: Logged Steve Kraus Film God Posts: 4094 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: May 2000 posted 05-17-2004 06:20 PM                    I screened the with / without tests for them during production. Darbeevision Web Site  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-17-2004 07:52 PM                     That sure is a stupid name... Couldn't they come up with something better than that? Mark  |  IP: Logged Steve Kraus Film God Posts: 4094 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: May 2000 posted 05-17-2004 08:05 PM                    Well, all the really cool sounding names like Dolby and Todd-AO were already taken. Not to mention Nintendo, Nakamichi, Toyota and Olde Frothingslosh.  |  IP: Logged Carl Martin Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1424 From: Oakland, CA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 05-18-2004 01:45 AM                        i liked the look of the company. it was shot on video, not to look like it was shot on film, but to use some of the characteristics of video aesthetically. i think that's the right approach to videography. carl  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 05-18-2004 09:02 AM                     So is Ken running Darbeevision since he left Barbee ....or is it Darbee O"Gill and the leprecons creating this process in the Keebler kitchens . The image enhancement demo is  |  IP: Logged Christian Appelt Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 505 From: Frankfurt, Germany Registered: Dec 2001 posted 05-18-2004 06:10 PM                     Carl, did you see THE COMPANY on DVD or in a movie theatre? To me, this level of sharpness is almost painful, especially when the film uses many long shots. You just cannot see detail, and all backlight shots (like in the dancing gym) look like home video with automatic iris control. Maybe it's just another case of "good enough", but I don't feel it is  |  IP: Logged Carl Martin Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1424 From: Oakland, CA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 05-18-2004 08:54 PM                        why, in a theater of course! now it didn't look like baraka or anything, but for what it was it looked fine to me. the trick is to be a little flexible and allow yourself to appreciate it on its own terms. watercolors don't look like oils but they can still be beautiful, as long as they're not trying to look like oils. of course, it may well be that the print you saw didn't look as nice as the print i saw. but i've seen plenty of 35mm originated films that looked worse, godsend being a recent example. carl  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-18-2004 10:20 PM                     Well, I agree that Olde Frothingslosh is a very cool name but Toyota is typically Japaneese and suggests the name of a toy company to me... not a very cool name at all....and then there is Greenleaf And Ironside but thats another interesting thing all together..... Mark  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.