|
|
Author
|
Topic: Studios eye new anti-piracy technology
|
Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man
Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 07-04-2004 01:27 AM
Eventually, it'll be circumvented. Nothing is foolproof. If someone is smart enough to make something like this, there will be someone equally smart to defeat it.
quote: Studios eye new anti-piracy technology
By GARY GENTILE AP BUSINESS WRITER
LOS ANGELES -- The organization behind the Academy Awards is eyeing new technology to prevent a sequel to last year's embarrassing attempt to protect films by not distributing them to Oscar voters at all.
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has endorsed a plan to distribute about 6,000 special DVD players to members. Specially encrypted discs, known as screeners, would be earmarked for a specific academy voter and would play only on that person's machine.
"It's extremely impressive," said academy President Frank Pierson. "It certainly looked foolproof to us."
The player also would imprint an invisible watermark on the disc each time it is viewed. In addition, if someone uses a camcorder to tape the movie as it is playing on a monitor, that image would contain information on the person assigned the machine.
Several studios said they were considering participating in the effort, but no studio has made a formal commitment. Similar watermarking technology used last year on lower-quality videocassettes helped authorities track and convict an Illinois man who had obtained screeners from an academy member and duplicated hundreds of illegal copies for sale.
The success of that effort led Cinea Inc., a division of Dolby Laboratories, to approach the academy about a combination of encryption and watermarking so studios could once again distribute screeners on DVDs.
The Motion Picture Association of America, which represents studios, last year banned the distribution of screener DVDs and videotapes over concerns about bootlegging. Many of the screener copies are of films that are in movie theaters or are still unreleased.
The studios later changed the policy to allow the shipment of encoded videocassettes to Academy Award voters only. A federal judge, however, granted a temporary injunction lifting the screener ban in a lawsuit brought by independent production companies, which argued the policy put them at a disadvantage for awards.
Cinea will invest several million dollars to make and distribute the DVD players to academy members and possibly to movie critics and other awards groups.
"We feel pretty good about the investment and putting the money upfront because we've gotten a lot of positive reinforcement for this idea," said Laurence Roth, Cinea vice president and co-founder.
Cinea executives said that with enough time and money, a hacker could eventually circumvent the encryption technology hardwired in a single DVD player, but the watermarking will help authorities track down that player.
The discs, by themselves, cannot be hacked, Roth said.
The studios would be expected to pay for a machine to encode its discs and a licensing fee to use Cinea's anti-piracy technology.
Cinea is gambling that the high-profile use of its system will persuade the industry to adopt it more widely to protect films as they pass through post-production facilities - another source of bootlegged copies - as well as "digital dailies" - the snippets of film sent, often on DVD, from a film's shooting location to studio executives or a film's marketing partners.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/movies/apmovies_story.asp?category=1402&slug=Secure%20Screeners [ 07-04-2004, 02:28 AM: Message edited by: Paul G. Thompson ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug
Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 07-04-2004 03:58 PM
quote: Scott Norwood anyone who is voting for a major award ought to see the films in question properly in a screening room or, preferably, a good commercial theatre with a real audience. Anyone who makes a voting decision based upon watching a video version of the film is just being lazy.
quote: Dennis Udovich The people involved in the motion picture business and then won't go to a movie theatre to see it. That's unbelievable!
I don't agree at all. If I work at Foster Farms killing chickens all day for a living, does that mean I should not go to the supermarket and buy some pre-packed breasts cuz I didn't choke my chicken myself?
Also, many, many moons ago, while in the U.S. Army Crypto school and having had much better encode/decode and encryption-busting training than the U.S. Navy and Air Farce combined, I can honestly say you guys are missing the point of the proposed new screener scheme. It really doesn't matter if the technology is "cracked" or not, the real plus is the invisible watermark traceability for nabbing those jerks.
That's the ticket.
quote: Brad Miller This whole video laziness is Valenti's biggest screwup. (And yes I blame it fully on him, since he blames 92% of all bootleg copies on us.)
Brad, I don't agree with your dumbass statement about Jacko...he was just "doing his job." And remember, there are FT members here that have "personally" spoke with him and know the "real" Jack.
>>> Phil
Typos corrected... [ 07-04-2004, 05:53 PM: Message edited by: Phil Hill ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|