Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Video Editing & DVD Technical Info Question

   
Author Topic: Video Editing & DVD Technical Info Question
Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 07-17-2004 08:30 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This is a question for all the video editing gurus, and the DVD techie gurus. I recently edited my first video using Pinnacle's Studio 9.1 program. I'd like to upgrade to the Adobe suite as soon as finances allow, but for now, this one will have to do.

When I edited the video (which is from a VHS source), and burned the DVD, and played it back on my TV (which is always set to "anamorphic" mode, where it takes the video signal and stretches it out to fill the wide screen) I fully expected the TV to stretch a 1.33 image out and distort it like it does with every TV Series DVD I own - ala The Simpsons, X-Files, Star Trek, whatever. But it didn't. It showed the video in a 1.33 box with black bars on the sides. I thought that maybe the Pinnacle software made the DVD anamorphic, and added the black bars into the picture for me.

I then took the DVD to my dad's TV, which is a 4:3 TV, and it played full screen. Now I'm totally confused. Somehow, this DVD seems to be encoded in such a way that my dad's TV & DVD player know what to do to play it full screen, AND my TV & DVD player, while both set to 16:9 mode ALSO know to play it undistorted in a 1.33 box with black bars on the sides.

1) Does anyone have any insight into what's going on? And 2) Assuming that this is a possible format to use on a DVD and not some stupid mistake on my part, why aren't the TV Series DVDs encoded this way? It would make it a LOT easier for me so I don't have to keep switching my TV back and forth.

Thanks.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-17-2004 09:15 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It depends on if an anamorphic flag is on the DVD. Maybe your stretched mode got turned off. However I refuse to help people watch something in an incorrect aspect ratio.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 07-17-2004 11:07 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Good, because since I'm sure you read my post, you know that the whole point is that somehow BOTH a widescreen TV and a standard TV managed to play back a DVD recording of a VHS tape in 4:3 (the correct aspect ratio) without me having to adjust anything - which isn't usually what happens with 4:3 formatted DVDs.

So are you saying that if the Simpsons DVDs had the anamorphic flag set (even tho they're not anamorphic), they would automatically show in the correct aspect ratio without me having to adjust my TV to standard 4:3 mode? If that's the case, why the hell don't they do that?!?!?

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-17-2004 11:30 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It may just set to display 4:3 through the composite input.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 07-18-2004 12:10 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm curious about the setup of the widescreen TV and the DVD player used along with it. Lots of DVD players will adjust between showing 4:3 ratio content and 16:9 content and may pass that along via the component video output.

In other words, I don't think it is anything the Pinnacle software did to the disc.

And to go a little bit off topic, the Pinnacle Studio suite is not all that bad when you compare reasonably affordable PC-based video editing applications. If you're going to go with the Adobe suite, the main reason to get it is for After Effects. That's really the only Adobe video app that qualifies as really good. Premiere Pro 1.5 is an improvement over 1.0, but it still pales in comparison to an app like Final Cut Pro. I've heard complaints about the Adobe Encore DVD authoring application, and I don't quite understand the packaging of Adobe Audition (which used to be Cool Edit Pro). You can do some multi-track audio editing in that app. But to encode Dolby Digital 5.1 you have to buy a $299 plug in from SurCode and it installs into Premiere Pro. Wierd.

Video editing is the one area where Apple has a solid lead over the PC market. Much more simple. Final Cut Pro HD and DVD Studio Pro 3. Two apps and that's it. Oh, you could still buy the Mac version of Adobe After Effects, or spend a ton of money on Apple Shake. On the PC side things are just still way too complicated.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 07-18-2004 11:22 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The video I'm playing around with is a home movie of a family trip to Disney World from 17 years ago. I am using an old version of Cool Edit Pro to mix the audio since it's almost impossible to do the kind of audio editing I need to do in the Pinnacle Studio software. I'm finding myself laying out the video, mixing the audio to match separately, and then recombining them to make the final movie (ie - one video file with the audio muted, and one big wav file with all the audio mixed the way I want it including background noises, music - which I'm also editing so the flourishes match the transitions and such, and the dialog). It's quite a chore, but the finished product is awesome.

The TV is a Toshiba 50HDX82 projection TV. The DVD player is a Toshiba SD-3800-U. They are connected with the component video cables. When I load up Star Wars Episode I widescreen DVD, it plays in wide screen mode. If I hit stop, and load The Simpsons and hit play, it stretches the 4:3 image to fill the 16:9 screen thus distorting the picture. If I hit stop again and load my Pinnacle Disney Trip DVD and hit play, it plays in 4:3 with black bars on the sides.

I think I might have figured it out. In my DVD player, there is a setting for "TV Shape" which is set to 16:9. There is also a setting for "4:3 Progressive" which is set to 4:3. If I change that setting to "Full" it stretches the 4:3 out to the full width of the screen like it does for The Simpsons DVD.

SO... Does that mean that my Pinnacle DVD must have a progressive scan video signal and the Simpsons DVD is interlaced? If so... Why?

Thanks for all the help and insight on the Adobe suite. Maybe I'll just stick with Pinnacle and instead upgrade Cool Edit Pro.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 07-18-2004 12:56 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I thought all DVD video content was encoded as progressive scan, hence the term "480p". My guess is the Simpsons DVD may lack some kind of flag to tell the player it is 4:3 content only.

As for the Adobe stuff, I would download the demos for those programs and give them a "test drive". See how they stack up to the Pinnacle software.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-18-2004 04:10 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
All DVD content is considered 4:3 unless it has a 16:9 flag. It is up to the way you have your TV set up whether it is displayed progressively or not. If you watched interlaced footage on a progressive scan monitor, you will see both fields at the same time and it will look like crap.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 07-18-2004 04:11 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
Video Basics and how Interlacing and Progressive Scan works

 |  IP: Logged

John Lasher
Master Film Handler

Posts: 493
From: Newark, DE
Registered: Aug 2001


 - posted 07-20-2004 05:09 PM      Profile for John Lasher   Author's Homepage   Email John Lasher   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I believe some widescreen TVs are designed to automatically detect when something is in 4:3 mode (and display it with black bars on the sides) this might be the answer (If you still have it, the instruction manual from the TV might say something about this.)

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.