my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Scanner question Epson Perfection 3170

Author Topic: Scanner question Epson Perfection 3170 Steve Kraus Film God Posts: 4094 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: May 2000 posted 11-26-2004 10:47 AM                    I just posted a scan of an old roll of nitrate film over on the Ground Level / Film Preservation School thread. But it was a bitch to scan and I don't know why. I tried scanning it as transparancy, positive, B&W settings as you might expect to try it. But with all attempts, both on preview and actual scan I would get something like this: It looks like when you use a Photoshop effect to find edges. I tried various settings including color to no avail; always something like that or a color variation. I tried flipping the film between emulsion up or down. With the transparancy tray or without. With a glass plate to flatten the film or not. Always the same. I finally put a scrap piece of ordinary color stock on the scanner and scanned that just to prove it was working ok. That looked normal. So left that in place and put the B&W nitrate across the scanner. That did the trick. Here is a screen cap of the preview window. (The color frames are Super 35 framing leader from running The Matrix effects footage for the W. Brothers.) Without that color stock there the preview of the nitrate would look like the image above. Any ideas what is going on?  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 11-26-2004 11:15 AM                        You didn't specifically mention it in your post, but is there a scanner b&w setting called "gray scale" or something like that? I'm sure you would have tried it though. It looks like what you were getting would be "line art".  |  IP: Logged Steve Kraus Film God Posts: 4094 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: May 2000 posted 11-26-2004 11:39 AM                    Yes, gray scale was what I tried. Also color, even negative. Line art wasn't an option. Film is still sitting on the scanner so I reopened the program and did a preview scan. With it set on color positive transparancy I got the same image as the 2nd one above. OK...reached over and removed the Matrix clip. New preview...hmm...now it looks like proper scan. Now moving the nitrate film to a lengthwise orientation. Preview scan again. Now we are back to the line art look. So the presence of the other clip wasn't the issue but the vertical orientation was. The plot thickens.  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 11-26-2004 11:50 AM                     I have an Epson Perfection 3200 scanner. The scanner is really nice, but the software sucks. I have that same issue when scanning film. On the 3200, you HAVE to have one end of the film cut, or the software will not recognize it. However you can turn it sideways (only 4-5 frames worth) and it will scan perfectly. This is why the Reel ID section is only showing 4 frame lengths on reel changes like Spongebob, where it is preferred to show the last seen images on the reel, rather than black. For this purpose, it actually works out nicely, because having only 4 instead of 8 ID frames for reference is an obvious tip that you are dealing with a fadeout.  |  IP: Logged Randy Stankey Film God Posts: 6539 From: Erie, Pennsylvania Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-26-2004 11:58 AM                     On some scanners I have seen, ther is a little "calibration window" that has to be perfectly clear in order for a scan to work. If part of that window is obstructed the scans won't come out. Second, I wonder if the refractive index of nitrate stock is such that the scanner can't focus on the image. Then putting in another piece of film that the scanner CAN focus on makes the nitrate "read" where it didn't before. Just spitballing...  |  IP: Logged Steve Kraus Film God Posts: 4094 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: May 2000 posted 11-26-2004 12:51 PM                    When I'm in so-called professional mode I don't want it auto recognizing anything. Just show me what's there. Brad is right; the software sucks majorly.  |  IP: Logged Adam Martin I'm not even gonna point out the irony. Posts: 3686 From: Dallas, TX Registered: Nov 2000 posted 11-26-2004 01:12 PM                     Amen, Steve. I should have full control in Pro mode, but I never do. I've got an HP Scanjet 3570c and the software is the worst! Why do they have to make user interfaces with Director? Why can't they just make real software any more?  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 11-26-2004 01:41 PM                     Steve - use "home mode". It's better.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 11-26-2004 11:11 PM                     I haven't seen any scanning software for units under $1000 that was worth a damn. I have a slightly older Epson Perfection Photo 2450 model and get some of the same kinds of headaches. Overall, it is tempting for me to buy a SCSI add-in card for my Dell machine. I still have this older Linotype-Hell Saphir scanner (which cost me $1100). It is a SCSI based unit. My old SCSI PC is dead, so basically this scanner is one expensive paperweight. It has only a 600 X 1200 optical resolution, which was decent for 1997. But the scanner was well built, captured color very well and the Color Factory Pro software that came with it was great.  |  IP: Logged Steve Kraus Film God Posts: 4094 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: May 2000 posted 11-26-2004 11:34 PM                    Epson sez the issue is caused by obscuring the white reference area. I said that it was ridiculous that it couldn't see white in the remaining area that is not obscured by a strip only 35mm wide. Or that they simply allow one to choose a white point. They said...um...nope; don't expect that on any update. Shoulda bought an Epson Expression series, they said.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.