|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: Free To Air (FTA) Satellite receivers, Anyone getting their Premium TV via satellite?
|
|
|
|
Erick Akers
Arse Kicker
Posts: 201
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Registered: May 2001
|
posted 01-10-2005 06:06 PM
Brad, So far, it is totally legal. this is an ordinary Pansat 2500A satellite receiver, using the DVB standard, not a licenced and owned propriatary receiver.
But, if you want, check and see if anyone has been sent to the pokie, I couldn't find any info on anyone having been busted yet.
The Pansat opens these chanels, kind of like a dvd player, this receiver has a hidden menu for commercial brodcast systems. Like setting a DVD player for region free. Once software is loaded, It doesn't descriminate between subscribed channels, it enables all channels at the same time, even feeds for PPV.
As it is not a registered and owned subscription receiver, it isn't subject to the same rules that would apply to Licenced Property Theft.
But don't worry, this probably won't last for long.
BTW: it comes with many broadcast formats straight from the factory.
You dont have to hack cards, use emulators, or any of the other covert ops. to open the channels, just change a simple bin file via RS-232 null modem cable.
The software is free; and at no charge, unlike the methods used by hackers to modify the Propriatory equipment.
I just took it out of the box and turned it on, and it turns out that there is way more already open and free without changing a single thing.
Pansat is a legitamate company,not THE DARK SIDE OF THE FORCE!
For channels available FTA check with lingsat.com website.
Dean, Exactly like ham, the channels do switch locations from time to time. just like the early days of satellite tv.
If they chose to use a secure addressable encription system, without open source code such as linux, then it would be illegal to watch.
BTW: there is some work involved, you have to map your own channels, and scan the sky.
Edited: for the protection of Film-Tech and Brad Miller! Season's Greetings! [ 12-13-2005, 07:07 AM: Message edited by: Erick Akers ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Erick Akers
Arse Kicker
Posts: 201
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Registered: May 2001
|
posted 12-05-2005 04:55 AM
Phill Enough said...
This receiver is coming from a manufacturer in your neighborhood, Panarax has been in business since 1982.
During the dawn of satellite TV, was it a moral question of signal theft?
Hell, I still have in my posession an expired users licence from before the dawn of the home satellite revolution!
Funny,
It's ok to post here about other illegal activities here such as Programming your DVD players for Regions Free operation. Piratimg Movies, or downloading Pirated movies ect...
All totaly illegal!
Even if spoken in Jest!
Why hell, if you use the magic search box, you will actually find many of our members, either illuding to doing such deeds or to openly confessing to performing illegal acts here.
There are so many; even by moderators, that I don't even believe Daryl could find them all without blanking the entire database, and I found quite a few!
As we share another hobby that resides in a grey area; Phll, you were the last person I thought would take offence at this subject!!! Cast any stones at yourself lately?
There is no U.S. law that states that receiving Canadian Signals are illegal!
If they (Canada) dont want it spilling over this far south, there is such a thing as a spot beam, they do it for all of the local channels for each U.S. state!
BTW: 1. I am a paying suscriber! 2. I never said I was watching un open channels, only that it was possible.
Believe me when I say, there's plenty of premium channels open and unscrambled sent out as back hauls, literally thousands!
As with all of the newer forms of DBS the signals go up, come down to the re broadcast center and than go back up to space and then come back down to the paying subscriber!
Bottom line, if they were bothered by this it would be scrambled from the point of origon and not use an open source code!
DirectTV and 4DTV are the only services that do just that!
It's just a hobby like anything else, but as with everyone, you are intitled to your own opinions on the subject.
Jeesuss Christ Miss Martha, Lighten Up!!!
Quote Phill Hill:
BTW: Erick, get off the I-30 stuff... posting and announcing about your illegal activities.....
So far you illuded to me being a thief, and a Drug user; and, if you reed between the lines...
As per F-T rule #1, should be considererd a personal attack!!!
If that was your intention; believe me, it was accepted as such!
What or who crawled up your ass, anyway?
I thought we were friends?
I guess only to a point!
Brad, Does Forum rule #1 count for shit?
Brad, Seriously,
If I have done anything to put Film-Tech in Jepordy, I apologise and would even resign my membership here, though this is hands down my favorite web forum!
I have never attacked another member here, I'm not a fighter just a lover and peace maker!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Erick Akers
Arse Kicker
Posts: 201
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Registered: May 2001
|
posted 12-05-2005 06:59 AM
quote: Phil Hill posting and announcing about your illegal activities...
Phil, That's the part that I Dont get, or understand?
The personal attack was in the wording:
"posting and announcing your illegal activities"
Note the word "Your".
If only that particular word was dropped from the statement!
If I'm wrong, please help me understand!
I accept the I-30 running joke, but why assume my activities are illegal?
I know you intended your statement as a frindly warning, but the meaning was lost in translation. (Pissed me off!)
Sometimes translations go wrong, dont they Phil?
Come on,
I have never seen you get "your panties all tied up in a knot" over any of the other subjects that fall into the other illegal catagories as listed!
All of the other illegal activities previously discussed here:
1. Hacking DTS discs. 2. Region Free DVD. 3. Downloading Pirated movies. 4. Collecting 35mm Features that fall off the truck.(Yeah Right!)
I mean, I would never intend to put anyone in danger, especially me!
As such, I have reworded my title and dropped any reffrence to certan satellite services previously listed!
Why would this one subject be any different, and jepordise the F-T web site more than the others?
All of these catagories fall into the relm of Federal law enforcement!
Surely, the other post would have already endangered Film-Tech by now.
Do we have any impending law suits?
If I was out of line, I apologise to everyone! Especially you! You loveable old Coot! [ 12-05-2005, 09:04 AM: Message edited by: Erick Akers ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|