|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: XM Radio
|
|
|
|
|
Dean Kollet
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 591
From: Florida State University
Registered: Jul 2003
|
posted 03-14-2005 02:46 PM
I have Sirius Satellite Radio, and I LOVE IT. Now that they are going to be the same price, it's going to be easier to sell people on Sirius. If you like Talk radio and sports, Sirius is better in my opinion...and their music stations are good as well. Some of XM's music stations have a deeper catalog, but I don't notice too much. I, also, sell Sirius and XM at my day job and they both sell very well. I have the JVC Sirius Receiver, and I use it in my car and at home on my home stereo. I also stream Sirius online from work. You won't be disappointed either way, they are both great.
Where will ou be installing this? I'm guessing in your car, which radio do you have? I ask this b/c it's a LOT better to wire it directly into your car via the dock and bypass the FM Modulation. Even when you plug into the Antena, it still can sound like Radio; where is if you plug it using an Audio input...it actually sounds like a CD.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 03-15-2005 09:07 AM
quote: Dean Kollet something tells me that they will never merge....that's like every cell phone company saying they are "wireless content services" and then merging into one...
Don't be so sure. I dug up one of the articles on the subject.
quote: E-MAIL STORY PRINTER FRIENDLY FOXFAN CENTRAL Sirius, XM Merger in the Works? Monday, January 31, 2005 By Tim Arango
Satellite radio rivals Sirius (SIRI) and XM (XMSR) have been cozying up to each other, The Post has learned.
While talks have not advanced far, executives from both sides have been meeting lately to discuss the possibility of a merger, according to several sources close to the matter.
Sources say the executives have not yet discussed price. They have, however, been weighing any potential antitrust concerns that would arise from a deal, which would create a monopoly in the nascent satellite radio business.
The two companies have talked in the past about merging, but the discussions never got to an advanced stage. But in the wake of Sirius' hiring of former Viacom President Mel Karmazin (search) in November, the issue has gained renewed urgency, sources said.
"Mel is a roll-up guy, a deal guy," said one source close to Karmazin.
While many people in the media industry say it's inevitable the two companies will eventually merge, sources say a deal could be at least a year away.
A spokesman for Sirius said, "as a company we do not comment on rumor or speculation." An XM spokesman did not return a call seeking comment.
The satellite radio industry is currently a Federal Communications Commission (search)-licensed duopoly, and both XM and Sirius are hoping they can convince the FCC to redefine the market to include all content over wireless broadband services.
As mobile technology in the United States advances, XM and Sirius are hoping the FCC will consider satellite radio as part of the broader industry of delivering music and other content through mobile devices, such as cellphones, say sources.
A merger between XM and Sirius — neither of which is yet profitable — would alleviate a price war for premium content and allow the two companies to save significant amounts of money on marketing costs.
Merrill Lynch analyst Laraine Mancini said in a conference call earlier this week that one of the chief risks of investing in the companies' stock is a potential price war and "irrational bidding" for content.
Last year, Sirius announced a blockbuster $500 million deal to bring Howard Stern (search) from traditional radio to satellite radio beginning in 2006. While some hailed the deal as a milestone for the fledgling sat radio industry, some on Wall Street said the company overpaid.
From: Merger Story
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|