|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Predictions for the 'legs' of episode III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dylan Marchetti
Film Handler
Posts: 27
From: New York, NY
Registered: Oct 2004
|
posted 05-20-2005 08:31 PM
I think it'll drop rather fast- the last two dropped after two weeks, but there was little competition the week after. Next week is Madgascar and Longest Yard, both of which stand a good chance of pulling $35+ million each (I think Madgascar could grab 50 if they ramp up the ads a little bit). This'll sap youngsters and teens, leaving Star Wars for young adults and the hardcore fans who are already watching it four times this weekend.
Also, this one is far more overscreened than the last two- Lucasfilm dropped the digital sound requirements, and some of the more restrictive booking rules (this time drive-ins are OK, etc.), giving it something like 700-800 more locations. That tells me that while the last two were selling out during the first weekend, forcing people to try again later, this one won't have that happen. With something like 8,000 prints, if you want to see it this weekend you can.
I say if it pulls $150 this weekend, it drops 55-60% next week to a more reasonable $55-65.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."
Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 05-20-2005 09:12 PM
Even though I liked EpIII in general, I don't see it playing to packed houses for anymore than a week. Attendance will start falling off rapidly then. The show will rake in a lot of money, but it will not play for long. It certainly won't have "legs." That's mainly over the studios' habit of making several thousand prints for a release rather striking a more normal number of 2000 to 3000 prints. Fewer prints would allow the films to play out in theaters longer.
Movies like "Forrest Gump," "Titanic" and even "Independence Day" had legs. The latter of those three 90's movies mentioned played to sold out houses for several weeks. "Titanic" was selling out 2 screens at Lawton's Carmike 8 from its December opening clear on into March when it cleaned up at the Oscars. The theater didn't lose print #2 until the middle of April. And it took May "summer movie" releases to push aside print #1.
Even if a movie is just freaking fantastic, an "instant classic" etc., we can forget about the show lasting as long as a recent film like "Titanic," or months and months on end like true blockbusters of decades past.
The press throws around the terms "hit" and "blockbuster" so loosely the terms have no meaning anymore. Ticket price inflation has made the $100 million mark absolutely meaningless. When a forgettable sequel like "Shrek 2" can place at #3 on the all time money makers list, it is a very clear sign the idiots in the entertainment press, exhibitors and most other movie industry people need to finally count numbers of tickets sold. If a movie sells 25 million tickets, that would be a qualified box office hit. If it sells 100 million tickets, I would consider that a true blockbuster.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|