|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Wallace & Gromit warehouse destroyed by fire
|
Erica Peterson
Film Handler
Posts: 26
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Registered: Jul 2003
|
posted 10-10-2005 08:51 AM
On the same weekend that "Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit" opened at #1 in the US and brought in $16.1 million, Aardman Animations was completely destroyed by a fire (article reproduced below):
BRISTOL, England -- The company behind the new "Wallace and Gromit" film said Monday its "entire history" has been destroyed in a fire at a warehouse containing props and sets.
The roof and three interior walls of the Aardman Animations building in Bristol, west England collapsed after the blaze tore through the Victorian building, fire officials said
The fire broke out at about 5:30 a.m. (0430 GMT), with flames reaching 100 feet into the air. The cause of the blaze was being investigated.
A spokesman for Aardman said the building housed props and sets from the company's history, including its first three "Wallace and Gromit" films.
No one was in the building when the fire broke out. Aardman said the sets and props from its latest film, "Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit," were not caught in the blaze.
Aardman has used stop-motion clay animation to create a series of acclaimed films, including three shorts featuring cheese-loving inventor Wallace and his resourceful dog Gromit.
The sets from those shorts -- "A Grand Day Out," "The Wrong Trousers" and "A Close Shave" -- are all thought to have been destroyed, along with those from "Chicken Run" -- Aardman's first feature-length release.
"Curse of the Were-Rabbit," Wallace and Gromit's first full-length feature, was released in the United States on Friday and topped the U.S. box office over the weekend.
"Today was supposed to be a day of celebration, with the news that 'Wallace and Gromit' had gone in at No. 1 at the U.S. box office, but instead our whole history has been wiped out," Aardman spokesman Arthur Sheriff said. "It's turned out to be a terrible day."
Sheriff said the warehouse contained sets, props and models from the company's productions, from the children's cartoon character "Morph" through the Oscar-winning, anthropomorphic "Creature Comforts" series to the Wallace and Gromit films.
Wallace and Gromit's creator, Nick Park, said the earthquake in South Asia helped put the loss into perspective.
"Even though it is a precious and nostalgic collection and valuable to the company, in light of other tragedies, today isn't a big deal," he said.
Aardman was founded in 1972 and is closely associated with Park, who joined in 1986 fresh out of film school.
Park's "The Wrong Trousers" (1993) and "A Close Shave" (1995) won Academy Awards.
Park and Aardman's Peter Lord directed the 2000 feature "Chicken Run," which spoofed the World War II prison-camp classic "The Great Escape" with a cast of clay poultry.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 10-11-2005 01:59 AM
At the moment I'm voting for the latter. I'm a bit surprised that they were storing that stuff where they were. That part of Bristol, round the back of Temple Meads station, is a run-down, high crime area of town. I can only guess that they were assuming that no-one would know what was being stored in there. Tramps squatting in a disused part of the building (or an adjacent one) and starting a fire to keep warm is another possibility, especially if security on the complex wasn't very good.
quote: Tim Reed I'd say those [preservation film elements from Aardman productions] are probably at a lab or in a film vault somewhere.
That's what you'd hope, but having come across some staggering cases of master elements being lost/mislaid/not looked after, I wouldn't assume anything. When a major British lab went into liquidation last spring, you wouldn't believe the stuff which the receivers found in outhouses and pretty dodgy storage on the site. These included the cut camera negatives from at least two feature films released in the last decade.
Producers - especially if it's an independent company rather than a big studio with its own corporate archive - frequently forget about original and intermediate elements once the print run and TK transfer have been done, leaving them with the lab for a nominal storage rent until either the production company or the lab goes out of business. Even in today's enlightened times, when any archivist could tell you all about the benefits of safeguarding these elements, it still happens. A friend of mine rescued preservation material and countless post-production sound elements from several well-known features from a lab in the early '90s when it moved premises. They're now with the BFI, but very nearly ended up as landfill.
If you don't have a corporate archive to fall back on, then when production is complete your two options are to deposit original material with a public archive or to pay a commercial storage company (e.g. Hollywood Vaults in the US) to look after these elements for you. Producers are often nervous about going near public archives due to fears about restricted access and piracy, while some public archives won't accept new material without significant copyright concessions. Paying a commercial storage company is money which a producer is often reluctant to spend, especially after (s)he has the release prints and TK master tapes needed to commercially exploit the film. So quite often these elements drop through the system. It's short sighted, but it does happen. Things are better than they were - for example, films and programmes produced in-house by major studios are now much more likely to get properly preserved, because the studios realise that they have a long-term commercial value that justifies the costs of preservation. But nine times out of ten, smaller operators and independents don't factor in long-term preservation of the finish product into their budgets.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|