|
|
Author
|
Topic: Howard Shore Replaced as King Kong Composer
|
Joseph L. Kleiman
Master Film Handler
Posts: 380
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Apr 2005
|
posted 10-15-2005 02:56 PM
From The Hollywood Reporter:
Oct. 15, 2005
'King Kong' composer Shore replaced
By Borys Kit and Sheigh Crabtree
Oscar-winning composer Howard Shore has left Peter Jackson's "King Kong" and is being replaced by James Newton Howard.
The move comes just two months before Universal Pictures is set to release the epic film, which bows Dec. 14 in the U.S.
Jackson issued a statement Friday saying that he and Shore were parting ways because of creative differences: "I have greatly enjoyed my collaborations with Howard Shore, whose musical themes made immeasurable contributions to 'The Lord of the Rings' trilogy. During the last few weeks, Howard and I came to realize that we had differing creative aspirations for the score of 'King Kong.' Rather than waste time arguing with a friend and trying to unify our points of view, we decided amicably to let another composer score the film."
The Jackson-Shore relationship has been a very successful one. Shore composed the score on all three of Jackson's "Lord of the Rings" films, as well as additional scoring for the DVDs, and won Oscars for "The Fellowship of the Ring" and "The Return of the King." Shore also shared an Oscar for best original song on the latter film with Fran Walsh and Annie Lennox. The composer had been working on the "Kong" score since wrapping "Return of the King."
Jeff Bond, editor at large of Film Score Monthly, said the difference could stem from Shore's artistic ambitions running against the demands of a big studio movie.
"Howard Shore is a guy, who particularly on 'Lord of the Rings' and a lot of his scores for David Cronenberg, has very specific artistic ideas that he likes to express in a score," Bond said. "That can be problematic if the composer is potentially running up against the thoughts of a director. Part of the problem is that the bigger the project, the less the score has an opportunity to be creative."
Ironically, Shore replaced another composer when he took over the music assignment on Martin Scorsese's "Gangs of New York" after Elmer Bernstein left that film.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Andy Summers
Master Film Handler
Posts: 397
From: Bournemouth Dorset United kingdom
Registered: Jun 2005
|
posted 10-15-2005 03:40 PM
Joseph’
Well, well, this sounds like a spanner in the works, oh dear, well “James Newton Hoard’s” scores are pretty good works, I have quite a few films on DVD and laserdisc where upon listening to parts where it will be soft mellow with a touch of suspense in it.
But this whole issue of the parting doesn’t sound good, and there is another issue hear regarding remakes Hollywood is clearly fresh out of ideas and looking to old films to basically lets do it in Technicolor Panavision anamorphic lenses six-track Dolby Stereo surround with Surround –EX and enough CGI effects to sink a battle ship.
I think one, ”King Kong” remake 1976 is more than enough, I would sooner see and hear the original with six-track Dolby Stereo digital sound, but it’s too late for all that.
Hear is a link to the up coming DVD package to this version of “King Kong” damn they stuck that together quickly, but there going to have to make changes to it regarding “Mr Howard Shore’s” parting. http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=58672
Sure there have been lots of classic remakes from “Ben Hur” to Psycho etc, etc, etc, why hasn’t Hollywood remade “Earthquake” or “The Towering Inferno” get the picture….
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene
Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 10-16-2005 01:07 AM
The discussion of does hollywood have any fresh ideas is in itself an old discussion. In another forum someone complained of the new "serenity" movie because space movies have been done before, and will hollywood ever get any fresh ideas.
Remember that even some of what most would consider original work really is nothing more than rehashed ideas in a different medium. Star wars for instance is nothing new. Just old stories in a new medium.
Books made from movies, movies from books, tv shows from books and movies and vice versa, it is all just different interpretations.
Take for instance the Boston Pops performing Beethoven's 5th symphony, and then compare it with the London Philharmonic. The mere fact that two different orchestras are performing the same music is lost on most people, but to the distinct listener, they can tell the difference, and may prefer one over the other. It doesn't mean that one is a remake of another, but rather just a different interpretation.
Besides, who the hell wants to her the latest work by Joe Stranglehoffer? We want BEETHOVEN!!!
It is up to many things, such as individual artistic interpretation and the preferences of the audience. One mans garbage is anothers treasure.
There are really only three original ideas. Vampires, cowboys, and spaceships. After that, everything is a rehash. The real point is, will it be of a worthwhile effort, and will it contribute to society in a postive way.
This is the point of art. Whether remakes or rehashes, all art is an expression of the one creating the product we see.
I am personally thrilled to see what peter jackson can deliver for us in King Kong. Maybe it will suck, maybe it will be a masterpiece. Only time and a viewing will tell. And even then, it is going to be up to the beholder to decide.
Such as is all forms of art. Be it they paintings, neosculpture, musical factories (see david byrne), or whatever.
Ciao
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|