|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Author
|
Topic: Christmas at the office: harassment?
|
Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene
Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 12-11-2005 12:28 PM
In this holiday season so many of us want to be all festive and such, and as such some may get a little carried away. So before I begin on this post, I do not want this post to be degraded into a politically or religiously based argument. I just want to know if you feel it is right or wrong, from a human and respect point of view, or if I am just plain goofy.
In my office my team is comprised of too many people that want to make christmas everything they ever wanted it to be, but what about those that don't want to be involved?
I am not opposed to anyone decorating or celebrating any way they wan't with thier religious holidays, even in the worklplace. However I do have a problem when members of the team have specifically asked to be left out of the involvement, and the team as a whole still involves them whether they like it or not.
To qoute our little ring leader "They don't have to participate if they don't want to, but we are going to decorate thier cubicle anyway and give them gifts, so if they don't like it, tough!" Doesn't that constitute forced participation?
Now before anyone goes off thinking I am trying to stop christmas, or that people need to be less sensitive, think again! As I stated before, I am all for people celebrating thier religious holidays any way that is permitted by employment law. Remember, this is in the workplace. Our employer is a publicly traded company and is a Fortune 50 company, with business interests in 138 different countries.
The problem is that when one person who does not celebrate in this way is forced to do so by thier co workers, this is where it starts to feel offensive. The reason that one chooses to not participate only needs to be important to the person who makes that choice, and does not need any validation from the group. There should be respect for this persons choice, and not be treated like they are misinformed.
So I ask you, my Film-Tech family; should I have the right to choose to not have participation in christmas activities at work by my own reasons, and not need to explain them to my co workers? Should I be able to expect a certain degree of sensitivity at the workplace, as I would expect if I were of another culture or religieon? Is it wrong for these co workers to forcibly involve people who have specifically asked not to be involved?
Remember do not let this get religious or political. It's a fine line as it is!!!
Ciao
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Greg Mueller
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1687
From: Port Gamble, WA
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 12-11-2005 01:02 PM
I think the world would be a better place if people could not participate if they don't want to. And not be bugged by others. And not bug others.
Like..... "In God We Trust" don't believe in god, fine, but don't try to take it from those who do. Believe that JC's b'day is the reason for the season, fine, but don't bug people that think it's all about Santa Clause and buying stuff. Don't like the 3 cross logo for the city of Los Cruces, fine, but don't try to change it, the other people (everyone but you) do like it. Live with it and don't get bugged
What ever it is you want or think, fine, just don't try to make anyone else like it or do it.
To each his own and keep it outta my face
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God
Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 12-11-2005 02:35 PM
Is this an issue where:
A) The "non-participant" is of a religious Faith that doesn't belive in Christmas? (e.g.: Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist?)
B) The "non-participant" is of a religions Faith that celebrates Christmas but not in the way that most American Christians celebrate? (e.g.: Jehova's Witness?)
C) The "non-participant" celebrates Christmas in the tradional way but only with family members and close friends?
D) The "non-participant" simply doesn't like the crass, commercialism most people practice when it comes to celebrating Christmas?
E) The "non-participant" just doesn't like the people well enough to celebrate Christmas at the office.
If we're talking about situation "A" or "B" then I agree. The people at the office should simply BUG OFF... No questions asked. Do these people know that the "non-participant" is of a religious Faith which doesn't allow them to celebrate? Would revealing this information create a hostile work environment toward the "non-participant"?
<facetious humor> If all the above are true then I suggest that you look through the phone book and find the sleaziest, low-down, dirty lawyer you can dredge up from the bottom of a cesspool, somewhere, and sue the living shit out of the company and everybody in it from the C.E.O. on down to the janitor! </facetious humor>
Seriously... If you have one of those issues those people should leave you alone.
If it's situation "C" then the people at the office should have enough class to simply say, "Merry Christmas.", and leave well enough alone.
If we're talking about situation "D" or "E" then I think you're being a little bit thin-skinned. The truth is that most people are too freakin' STOOPIT to realize that some people just don't want to "play" their games.
If we ARE talking about situation "A" or "B" then you have the right to carefully remove the decorations from your cubicle, put them into a bag or box and place them on your boss's desk with the statement, "I'm [Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Jehovah's Witness]. These decorations are against my religion."
If they give you any flack about it you can give them a choice:
1) They can cease and desist.
2) You will sue for religious parity and demand that a giant Menorah be errected in the front lobby of the building and that a Rabbi be called in to say prayers on Hanukkah... All at the company's expense, of course! [ 12-11-2005, 10:18 PM: Message edited by: Randy Stankey ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|