my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Why are most multi-screen theatres named with the number of screens? (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Why are most multi-screen theatres named with the number of screens? Lyle Romer Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1400 From: Davie, FL, USA Registered: May 2002 posted 05-18-2006 09:40 PM                     I mean really, why does anybody need to know how many screens there are? As long as the movie you want to see is playing at a time convenient for you what's the difference if there are 3 or 300 other shows playing around the building?  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 05-18-2006 10:05 PM                        When multiplex theatres were first being built (unfortunately some were multiplexed by poorly dividing well-designed larger auditoriums), including the number of screens in the name was likely used to let the consumer know they had additonal choices of films in what used to be a single-screen situation. For a while, during the "megaplex" craze, there seemed to be a numbers game to see which circuit could build and advertise the most number of screens on a given site, sometimes without regard to the quality of the viewing experience, especially on the smaller screens.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 05-18-2006 10:16 PM                     I think there's a correlation between bragging about screen count and penis size. Whatever number is larger, the better. Nevermind that somewhere along the line that number no longer denotes "inches" but rather "centimeters" or mere "milimeters." I've seen 30-plex sites with screening rooms as tiny as some living rooms, where 20 of the screens in the site could fit on the footprint of a traditional 8-plex. Yes, it does not matter in the slightest who has the most screens. What matters above all is who has the BEST screens. I can watch only one movie at one time on one screen. So that quality thing is really the only relevant thing -at least from the customer's point of view.  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-19-2006 01:41 AM                        So I guess the best name for a cinema would be "Movieplex 25 Best Screens."  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-19-2006 07:29 AM                        I see on http://www.moviewatcher.com/ that AMC has seen fit to re-name the Uptown in DC to the "Uptown 1." In keeping with this trend, I think that Mike should re-name his theatre to "Roxy 1."  |  IP: Logged Keith Peticolas Expert Film Handler Posts: 108 From: Eagle River, Alaska, USA Registered: Aug 2001 posted 05-19-2006 08:11 AM                     Back in the 1970's the best theater in my home town was called the "Video" twin. It grew up one day and became the "Video" 4. Always thought that was a really dumb a**ed name for a movie theater.  |  IP: Logged Bill Enos Film God Posts: 2081 From: Richmond, Virginia, USA Registered: Apr 2000 posted 05-19-2006 11:25 AM                     The corporate name conjurers lack the originality to do anything better. Same goes for the auditorium decorators. Maybe they could try honesty with something like "The Ordinary 24", or "Average Theatres for Average People", "The Dumpy Cinemas 12"  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 05-19-2006 12:44 PM                     quote: Keith Peticolas Back in the 1970's the best theater in my home town was called the "Video" twin. It grew up one day and became the "Video" 4. Always thought that was a really dumb a**ed name for a movie theater. Lawton had a theater called the "Video Triple." Carmike operated it through much of its life. The place closed in the late 1990s and now a hardware store is using the building.  |  IP: Logged John McConnel Expert Film Handler Posts: 118 From: Okmulgee, OK USA Registered: Nov 2003 posted 05-19-2006 08:14 PM                        Video Independent Theatres, a modest-sized circuit headquartered in Oklahoma City, started using the name Video on their new theatres in the 1970s, which was late in its life. Most were two-screens, but a few were one and three-screen. Video was started in the teens as Griffith Theatres. It evolved into Video Independent Theatres in 1949, and was absorbed by Martin Theatres in 1982. Martin subsequently became Carmike Cinemas. Griffith/Video were tough operators, and were the dominant circuit in Oklahoma for many years.  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-19-2006 09:20 PM                        quote: Scott Norwood In keeping with this trend, I think that Mike should re-name his theatre to "Roxy 1." The address labels we get from TDS (New Line's promo company) already call us that, so we're partway there already!  |  IP: Logged Sam Graham AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues. Posts: 1431 From: Waukee, IA Registered: Dec 2004 posted 05-19-2006 10:23 PM                        National Amusements officially named their multiplex in Davenport, Iowa "Showcase Cinemas 53". It's named this because it's on 53rd St. It has 18 screens. Somebody at NA has a sense of humor.  |  IP: Logged Robert E. Allen Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1078 From: Checotah, Oklahoma Registered: Jul 2002 posted 05-20-2006 01:28 AM                     It has been thought by the corporate big boys for a couple of decades that multiple auditoriums, digital sound and stadium seating will cause the movie going public to flock to their cinemas. The truth of the matter is that good product, good service and reasonable prices will build business. I'm all for the technological advances our industry has made but I'd rather offer the public a good film with mono sound on a sloped floor in a single screen house than some of the digitalized garbage that's come out in the last few years. If we'd get back to making good product instead of offering the public only CGI special effects and digital sound on our multiple screens (which really only draw techno-geeks anyway) we could all smile on the way to the bank.  |  IP: Logged Chris Unwin Film Handler Posts: 20 From: Langley B.C. Canada (Vancouver) Registered: May 2006 posted 05-22-2006 03:51 AM                     Typical big business b.s. bigger is always better,etc. We have a chain up here in canada called Famous Players. Their motto is: Big Screen Big sound Bid Difference! YA....OK! How bout big dump. These places are so poorly run. The screen is floor to ceiling and wall to wall, therefore the image is stretched so bad it looks like a really cheap video projector image. Almost always out of focus. The real projectionists are long gone and when you finaly find someone to tell them the focus is really off half of them don't even know what your talking about!! One manager I talked to remembered me from a different theatre and asked me if I could come up to the booth as she had NO IDEA what I was talking about or how to fix it! (yes...I did go up....I felt bad for her.) Give me a Single screen mom & pop theatre ANY DAY over the Big Dump 20 plex. By the way famous players.....The Drive-in down the road has a screen more than DOUBLE the size of your biggest screen. They also still have a REAL projectionist and the presentation is Beautiful.  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 05-22-2006 08:32 AM                        Robert: Much money has been spent in this industry to "lure the public." My personal concern is that a lot of this money has been spent to "fool ourselves." IMO multiple auditoriums (beyond that needed for booking requirements) and rocking chair seats fall into that area. Assuming that the seat is serviceable and clean, who really cares? As stated above, I can only see one auditorium at a time. Wouldn't all concerned be better off to have fewer, better screens? Louis  |  IP: Logged Brian Michael Weidemann Expert cat molester Posts: 944 From: Costa Mesa, CA United States Registered: Feb 2004 posted 05-22-2006 11:42 AM                        The number of auditoriums is one of the various options open to a customer. We could name our theatres after other options we offer; for instance, the number of different popcorn sizes/combos. We are the Irvine Spectrum 3 now. Of course, that in no way distinguishes us from any other theatre.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.