|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: SCART Switch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God
Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 05-22-2006 05:46 PM
That's one of the problems with SCART; it's not obvious what signals it provides, or accepts. Could be composite only, composite+RGB, composite+s-video; I've even seen one which handled only audio signals, no video at all!
Then there's the lack of support for Y,Pr,Pb, and the fact that the RGB connections are input or output, not both at the same time, though neither of these would have been a problem in the original intended use. They were intended mainly for home use, where most people at that time were connecting video equipment to televisions via a RF cable to the ariel socket, even where video/audio connections existed; they were seen as being too complicated/too much bother/why use four cables when one will do?
SCART enabled a single cable, and unlike the old EIAJ 8-pin connector often found on U-Matic etc. handled stereo sound. If you connect a signal source and a display together with a fully-wired SCART cable they will generally automatically work in the best mode of which both are capable.
On most televisions which have two SCART sockets only one is RGB capable, the other often has s-video, so you do need to know which to connect to, which goes against the original design concept. The Philips idea of colour coding the sockets blue or orange to indicate whether they handled RGB never seemed to catch on, and I can never remember which colour was which. As I've said before, it was a good idea, but badly implemented. Also, some of the cables are of very poor quality.
Do you ever get SCART over there; I've never seen it on any American equipment?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God
Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 05-23-2006 07:24 AM
Most cables and devices are fully-wired these days, but not all are. In the past composite only ones were quite common, as few people had any use at home for RGB signals; about the only thing that used them were a few early home computers, such as the BBC micro, which output a basically broadcast standard 625/50 interlaced signal, but could do so in RGB form if required. This was the original reason for the inclusion of RGB in the SCART spec, and the reason why separate input and output pins were nor provided; computers were always outputs, and televisions were always inputs.
The RGB connections which most televisions had provided for some years were seldom used until things like DVD players and digital set-top boxes started to appear, when they proved to be useful. Because most televisions in Europe had SCART connections, which could handle RGB, but not Y, Pr, PB, DVD players for the European market tended to have RGB (via SCART only) and component connections, but not Y, Pr, Pb, unlike those in NTSC countries. Recently, Y, Pr, Pb connections have started to appear, on three phono sockets, though most televisions do not have the inputs they are provided on most projectors these days. Oddly, it tended to be on the cheaper DVD players, of Chinese origin, where Y, Pr, Pb component outputs were first provided.
More recently, DVD and hard disk recorders which can record RGB signals have created a need for bi-directional RGB signals; I'm not sure how they do this with only one set of pins, I assume they switch them between being outpus and inputs somehow.
Joe, what are you using to transcode <-RGB Y, Pr, Pb->, and will it do both NTSC and PAL? I've found a couple of units over here that do it, but they're ridiculous prices.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God
Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 05-23-2006 05:35 PM
quote: myself Because most televisions in Europe had SCART connections, which could handle RGB, but not Y, Pr, PB, DVD players for the European market tended to have RGB (via SCART only) and component connections, but not Y, Pr, Pb, unlike those in NTSC countries.
I just read what I wrote, and it's wrong. What I meant to say was:
Because most televisions in Europe had SCART connections, which could handle RGB, but not Y, Pr, PB, DVD players for the European market tended to have RGB (via SCART only) and composite connections, but not Y, Pr, Pb, unlike those in NTSC countries.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God
Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 05-24-2006 04:47 AM
SCART does use what is normally the composite video pin for the sync when in RGB mode; I think all RGB monitors that I've ever seen with BNC connections can use either four cables (separate sync), or three cables (sync on green). They either have a switch or auto detect. Many these days have five connectors, so they can also work with positive horizontal and vertical syncs, so they can also be used as VGA computer displays. Over here separate sync is certainly far more common; I'm not sure if I've ever actualy used sync on green. Do you use sync on green over there?
Y,Pr,Pb always seems to be just three cables, I assume that it's sync on Y.
Getting back to SCART, another advantage of it is that a VCR can automatically switch a television into video mode when play is pressed, and switch it back to off-air mode when the tape is stopped.
I would guess that the days of SCART are now numbered; many new high end televisions over here are now 'HD ready', using either DVI or HDMI inputs, with HDCP. There is no HD broadcasting yet, but it's due to start this year. Analogue broadcasts are due to shut down within a few years, and VHS recorders are rapidly going out of fashion. Most of the higher-end (and many of the cheaper) new DVD players and recorders now have digital connections.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|