|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Has Shyamalan DEFIED or DEFINED Convention?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Schaffer
"Where is the Boardwalk Hotel?"
Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002
|
posted 07-10-2006 05:03 AM
quote: Dick Vaughan Michael
Congratulations on Germany coming 3rd in the World Cup
Thanks, Dick. But I can't accept your congratulations - I really didn't have anything to do with it! But I am happy for them that they got this far, after all the changes and restructuring Klinsmann had to make, and for which he was massively criticized. But he made the right decisions.
Right now, I am still puzzled by what Zidane did. What a shame! He more or less handed the Cup to Italy. Well, not quite, still, what a shameful exit.
BTW, I was in Berlin for the first two weeks of the WC, not actually *for it*, it was more a timing coincidence. But the athmosphere was fantastic, a giant party, super-relaxed and unaggressive.
Sorry England sucked - but then they always do, don't they?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Michael Schaffer
"Where is the Boardwalk Hotel?"
Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002
|
posted 07-10-2006 04:57 PM
Dennis is totally right. Baseball is just a local tribal game, like Elephant Polo. That's what I said I believe the most popular sport in Australia is Koala Kicking, though.
I also liked most of the Shyamalan movies, except for "Unbreakable", but I don't find them, if not quite the same as the typical mainstream sauce, not particularly revolutionary. Well written and made, usually with some surpise in stock. But I also find them very vain in style - "oh, look, how unusual I am. Look, look, really, I am so unusual." But then, they aren't *that* unusual. There are bazillions of films which are completely outside the Hollywood mainstream and much more "unusual" and "convention defying".
I find it kind of funny how the same marketing machinery which tries to sell us all those remakes and sequels and stillborn big budget movies emphasizes that little bit of "unusualness" - "This summer, one man will defy convention!"
On the other hand, it is interesting how slightly different movies can sometimes become huge surprise successes, so it would be good if they noted that and would be a little more daring and try to bring more movies into the cinemas which aren't remakes and sequels and all that. We would all profit from that.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 07-12-2006 05:16 PM
quote: Michael Schaffer No, because Shyamalamayalan has done neither. He is a fairly conventional mainstream film maker who poses cunningly as a non-conventional "auteur" type of film maker.
It's worth remembering what the term 'auteur' actually signifies. It was first used by a group of French critics in the late '40s (André Bazin & François Truffaut, mainly) who were trying to describe their reactions to the first imported Hollywood films to be shown in France since the end of the Nazi occupation. Bazin in particular believed that a director's 'personal vision' was evident in a mainstream studio production, even though it was the work of hundreds of people, foregrounded the role of stars and was made within a rigidly controlled economic system. He cited examples such as Ford and Hitchcock, and really used the term 'auteur' to mean a director whose personal touch is evident within a commercial, mainstream form of film-making.
Of course, many of this generation of critics and writers later became film-makers themselves (e.g. Truffaut), and tried to put their ideas into practice: hence the reason why, to most people, 'auteur' signifies black-and-white, in a foreign language, at least 10 reels long, sad looking people in beehive hairstyles chain smoking and talking about philosophy etc. etc.
What Truffaut and his mates never saw coming was the post-1980s phenomenon of Hollywood studios marketing directors as stars in their own right. I suspect that M. Night Wotshisname wouldn't qualify, as he is deliberately being used as a 'product' for marketing purposes along with the actors, special effects etc. The original idea of a Hollywood 'auteur' was someone who worked behind the scenes.
quote: Michael Schaffer Sorry England sucked - but then they always do, don't they?
Especially when the referee's Argentinian.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|