|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Forget Houston lets try Dallas!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God
Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 08-17-2006 06:02 PM
Is that the airport which is "served" by Tees-Side Airport station? If so, I think it has something like one train per day. In the recently-published station usage stats for 2004-5 it ranks at position 2493, out of 2502, on the National Rail network. The way these figures are drawn up is somewhat strange; some stations do appear unrealistically high, or low, in the table, but the figures for Tees-side Airport are:
Entries standard: 7 Entries reduced: 18 Entries season: 0 Total entries: 25
Exits standard: 32 Exits reduced: 17 Exits season: 0 Total exits: 49
These are the figures for the whole year, but are based on ticket sales, and so do not include things like people travelling on rover tickets, probably none at this station, but could be significant at others.
I'm not sure if the service (or lack of it) is responsible for the usage (or lack of it), or vica versa, but this situation really is a farce; if there's a need for a service to this station, then a proper one should be provided; if there isn't then it should be closed.
There are other stations like this: the best known probably being Reddish South and Denton, near Manchester, which are served by one train per week, in one direction only; there's no return working. This stretch of line is used from time to time for diversions when there is engineering work going on, but these stations are not served by these trains. I don't know if there's any freight on the line; I doubt it, there's not much on our railways now, they're mainly passenger.
The very lowest station in the list is Gainsborough Central, which had 9 total entries, and 12 total exits. The two lowest in the previous year were Barry Links, and Golf Street, in Scotland. When these figures were published last year, several people on the uk.railway newsgroup were planning to make a journey to, or from, these stations, just to boost the figures a bit. If they did so, they didn't make much difference; the stations were third and fifth from the bottom ths year.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 08-18-2006 05:20 AM
quote: Stephen Furley Is that the airport which is "served" by Tees-Side Airport station?
There's a bus from Darlington station but, AFAIK, no direct train straight to the airport. The railway passes the airport right at north end of the runway - over a mile from the terminal building at its nearest point, I'd guess - so if there is a station there, passengers would have a very long walk with their heavy suitcases. I think you'd have to have buses to take people between the trains and the terminal, and if you're going to faff about with buses at all, you might as well take people straight to Darlington, where the long-distance trains go from.
Better public transport links would boost traffic through that airport significantly, I think. The bus from Darlington doesn't start until 0800 and finishes at around 2000; so if you're leaving on the 0600 flight or returning on the 2155 arrival from London or the 2215 from Amsterdam, it's no good. The car park (though very reasonably priced by airport standards) is so congested that you have to book well in advance to be sure of a space. A pity: the airport itself is ideal - just big enough to have decent facilities but small enough not to have massive queues (Newcastle has now expanded to the point that it's almost as bad as Manchester when it comes to queueing for baggage drop-off and security).
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|