Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Letterboxing On TV Question

   
Author Topic: Letterboxing On TV Question
Will Kutler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1506
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 04-07-2007 06:20 PM      Profile for Will Kutler   Email Will Kutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe someone can answer my question? Why is it on television the opening and closing credits/title sequences to many films are shown letterboxed, and during the actual film it is switched to pann-and-scan?

For example, ABC TV For Family (a cable/satellite channel) regularly airs "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang", which was shot in Super Panavision. They show the opening title sequence and closing scenes letterboxed, but then show the film body in pan-and-scan. Why???

Cheers

K

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 04-07-2007 06:26 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mostly so that all of the credits are visible. Otherwise they'd have to pan back and forth a lot or just let anything at the sides be chopped off. Sometimes I've seen where they just run the credits squeezed to 1.33 which looks really bad. Running in 2.39 letterbox at least gets all of the frame visible.

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Curran
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 504
From: Springwood NSW Australia
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 04-07-2007 06:43 PM      Profile for Ron Curran   Author's Homepage   Email Ron Curran   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
... and the commercial channels get viewer complaints that they are cutting off the top and bottom of the picture if they letterbox the body of the feature.

Public channels here often show films in the correct proportions.

What I don't understand is where they get those Academy Format prints of recent films.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 04-08-2007 02:17 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The practice of showing opening trademark and credits of features that were in cinemascope and leaving them in the squeezed format was the standard norm on TV back then - both local station movies and network movies..and also the end credits as well-squeezed.

Even when VHS/BETA pre-recorded tapes were introduced in the late 70's to mid 80's, these productions carried the squeezed trademark and opening credits.

I've got the VHS copy of "Chitty,Chitty,Bang,Bang" (wonderful on the big screen in IB Techicolor and 4trk mag sound) in this same condition as what Will mentions: Opening credits in letterbox with the feature in pan and scan..

ABC TV in the late 60's would begin the movie AFTER the opening credits were over with and then at the end of the movie, play both the trademark and opening credits....which was a bit odd to witness.

-Monte

[ 04-08-2007, 04:33 AM: Message edited by: Monte L Fullmer ]

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 04-08-2007 04:26 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Lots of HDTV programs are being letterboxed when shown on SDTV these days, while others are not. Do the letterboxed programs get complaints from viewers? Lots of commercials are letterboxed as well, and with the advent of DVD, perhaps people are finally getting used to it.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 04-08-2007 10:21 AM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And then you've got channels like HBO, which go so far as to letterbox THE SOPRANOS for their SD channel, but then crop scope movies for their HD channel. What's up with that?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Strube
Master Film Handler

Posts: 322
From: Milwaukee, WI, United States
Registered: Feb 2007


 - posted 04-08-2007 11:00 AM      Profile for Mark Strube   Author's Homepage   Email Mark Strube   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
HBO loves the 1.78:1 ratio, which The Sopranos is in. For their HD channel, that's what they try to get all content in, even if it means cropping or open-matting movies that are supposed to be wider. There are a few exceptions... for example Star Wars Ep. 3 was kept in its original ratio, I'm sure because Lucas betched.

I'd say they only keep their original programming in widescreen on the SD channel because well... they're HBO. Their programming is of course more important than these mere "movies" they get the rights to play.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 04-08-2007 01:10 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Letterboxing of credits also has to do with contracts between actors / directors and the other principal guild /union members on projects. So the other people in the credits get to ride on the coat tails of the others during the letterboxing. Even if the film is so many years old. It also has the do with credits and size of lettering and placement in posters and other advertising materials.

 |  IP: Logged

Geoff Jones
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 579
From: Broomfield, CO, USA
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 04-08-2007 02:45 PM      Profile for Geoff Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Geoff Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, I got HBO for free for a few days through my cable company. I recorded a couple of movies (Red Eye & The New World) I had always wanted to see, but deleted them when I saw that they were cropped from 2:35 to 16:9.

I sent 'em a letter telling them I wouldn't become a subscriber as long as they were doing that. I doubt it did any good, but who knows.

 |  IP: Logged

James Westbrook
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1133
From: Lubbock, Texas, Usa
Registered: Mar 2006


 - posted 04-08-2007 03:04 PM      Profile for James Westbrook   Email James Westbrook   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Encore channels are unpredictable: A lot of their movies are panned and scanned, but less than a couple of weeks ago, Action ran Diamonds are Forever and Live and Let Die letterboxed.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-08-2007 03:11 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Showtime is normally pretty good about letterboxing.

 |  IP: Logged

John Lasher
Master Film Handler

Posts: 493
From: Newark, DE
Registered: Aug 2001


 - posted 04-08-2007 04:16 PM      Profile for John Lasher   Author's Homepage   Email John Lasher   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Ron Curran
...Academy Format prints of recent films
I hope that's meant to be sarcasm?

Nothing on TV is shown from a film print anymore. Even programming which originates on film (Many sit-coms and >90% of "Evening Soaps") is transferred to tape or some sort of digital media for broadcast. As far as how they get recent films in 4x3 format ("Academy" as you say), just log on to amazon.com and see how many recent films are available in FOOL Screen.

I get a wicked little thrill every time I have to explain to a customer why "Miami Vice" and "Flags Of Our Fathers" aren't available in P&S (short-short version: contractually forbidden).

Of course, I have the misfortune to live and work in a state with an illiteracy rating of 1 in 5.

 |  IP: Logged

Rick Raskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1100
From: Manassas Virginia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 04-08-2007 06:58 PM      Profile for Rick Raskin   Email Rick Raskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I happened to catch part of "The Ten Commandments" on HD last night. The focus was soft at best and I gave up watching. It looked to me that they were simply piping their SD broadcast into the HD channel. Given that TV doesn't run film in real time any more I think the least they could have done was do an HD transfer for broadcast. It was shown 1.33:1 instead of 1.85:1 and really looked BAD. [Frown]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.