my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Weird PC display problem

Author Topic: Weird PC display problem Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 09-05-2007 08:03 AM                        I've got a strange problem, either with my PC monitor or graphics card I guess. When I open an image file (JPEG, TIF, PSD - doesn't matter), the colour balance is OK in some applications, but has a purple/pink hue, like faded Eastmancolor, in others, as so: In the above example it's fine in Microsoft Office Imaging, but pink in Windows Photo Gallery. Another problem is that when I scan images directly into Photoshop, they appear fine on the scanner interface but pink once they're in Photoshop. If I scan direct to a file, close the scanner software and then open the file in Photoshop, the pictures are OK. Furthermore the pictures print correctly, even if they display in pink. Logic says that it can't be a problem with the monitor, because if the monitor was playing up it would affect the entire display, not just one window in it. However, this is a new monitor (Acer AL2416W, arrived on Saturday), and I didn't have this problem with the other one. The correct monitor driver is installed. I've tried tweaking the Adobe Gamma settings, but without any luck. Any suggestions appreciated.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 09-05-2007 11:10 AM                     The problem isn't with the monitor. You have a color management conflict within the operating system itself. Are you running Windows Vista? Lots of graphics people who have to use Windows-based systems are avoiding any upgrades to Vista (either on existing machines or pre-loaded into new systems). Numerous problems have been reported with various Adobe applications, although the recent CS3 upgrade suites solved many issues. Worse problems exist with scanner drivers. Business hasn't been great in that sector in recent years so various scanner manufacturers haven't been as quick as others to solve issues with Vista. The best thing I can suggest is making sure the drivers for your scanner, printer and video card are all up to date. Make sure you have the latest maintenance patches for whatever versions of Adobe software you're running. The Adobe Gamma loader program can also pose problems too. If you have a printer or scanner trying to run its own separate color management routines as well you can get wacky conflicts. Adobe Bridge is supposed to help make color management more simple, reliable and agnostic from what the operating system does -but that's only going to be good if you're running the version of Bridge that comes with the more print oriented Adobe suites containing InDesign, etc. Adobe's Production Studio suite is only geared for RGB (even though Photoshop & Illustrator still have all their CMYK functions within that suite).  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 09-05-2007 12:56 PM                        Many thanks Bobby. Yes, it's Vista. I'll make sure the graphics card and scanner drivers are up to date and all applications have the latest updates and patches on them, and see what gives. Watch this space...  |  IP: Logged Chad Souder Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 962 From: Waterloo, IA, USA Registered: Feb 2000 posted 09-05-2007 06:23 PM                     It sure seems to me like it is the driver for your video card. Vista has very few drivers actually finished and in good working order for video cards, so it is likely you may be up a creek for some time. My friend was having a similar problem with video clips. He fixed the problem by going back to XP.  |  IP: Logged Andy Muirhead Master Film Handler Posts: 323 From: Galashiels, Scotland Registered: Dec 2000 posted 09-05-2007 07:28 PM                     I've no idea at all why anyone would upgrade to Vista at the moment. Why "upgrade" to an OS which uses more system resources, which in turn makes your PC slower, and also has major compatibilty issues. I'd understand if you had a DirectX 10 card, but apart from that.. I'll be sticking with XP for, well, a long time yet!  |  IP: Logged Phil Hill I love my cootie bug Posts: 7595 From: Hollywood, CA USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 09-05-2007 07:36 PM                  I totally agree, Andy. I just bought another Dell notebook and had a choice of OS...I went for the XP Pro...have it on 3 computers. Vista sux!  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 09-06-2007 03:47 AM                        I put Vista on because I effectively had no choice. This was a homebuild PC I built a couple of months ago. The OS was bought from the University I work for, which is a member of the Microsoft corporate 'work at home' scheme whereby staff can buy Windows and Office for use on their home machines at a massive discount (£15 each). The only drawback is that, strictly speaking, you're supposed to uninstall the software when you leave that workplace. XP is no longer available under that scheme. So it would either have been a case of buying a fully portable Vista Ultimate licence at £15, or buying an XP Pro OEM licence for around £100 I guess. Given that I need the x64 edition, it might even have been more than that. To be fair, this is the first major bug I've come across with Vista. None of the applications I use most frequently (Firefox, Eudora, Word, Acrobat, Premiere, and Encore, basically) have crashed or played up, and the Windows Explorer interface on Vista is a lot easier to use than its predecessor, I think. My only real grouse so far is the security paranoia - 'click OK to confirm that you really want to do this' incessantly while you're installing software. I didn't have a chance to investigate the colour problem last night, but am increasingly convinced that it has something to do with Adobe. None of my Adobe applications are packaged into a bundle - they were all bought separately. These are Photoshop CS2, Acrobat 8 Standard, Premiere, Audition and Encore (all 1.5). I think I'm going to start by disabling Adobe Gamma Loader from running at startup and see if that solves it.  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 09-07-2007 06:10 PM                        Killed Adobe Gamma Loader - killed the problem with it. Thanks again to Bobby for the pointer.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 09-08-2007 01:06 AM                     Glad I could help. Normally Adobe Gamma Loader shouldn't cause color conflicts. But with Windows Vista screwing up so many different things, especially with peripheral devices like scanners and printers, the color conflicts seem like a guaranteed problem to have to endure. Also you mentioned running Adobe video-centric applications like Encore and Premiere. Are you running Adobe Production Studio? That suite doesn't have the same color control system as the print oriented "Design" suite with InDesign. I run Production Studio on my work computer and have CS3 Design Premium on my notebook at home. This is an issue I think Adobe seriously needs to address. Their video applications (like Premiere Pro and After Effects) tend to ignore ICC and ColorSync profiles embedded in image files from PC and Mac systems. The threat is that Adobe Photoshop's Gamma Loader can run amok and screw up color worse than it needs to be controlled. The "Design" print-oriented suite reigns in a lot of that nonsense. Keep checking back with the updates. Hopefully something will work out where you can have the Adobe Gamma Loader program running and not have it conflict with anything else in the system.  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 09-09-2007 05:41 AM                        quote: Bobby Henderson Are you running Adobe Production Studio? No - all my Adobe applications were bought individually (again, through the University's 'work at home' scheme) - before the Production Studio and Creative Suite bundles came out, in the case of the video stuff. The two bundles cost around £100 each to buy that way, and I don't have any need for the extra functionality at the moment. There's no doubt that Gamma Loader was the culprit here, because when I stopped it from running at startup, the problem went away. As you say, the underlying cause is probably Vista, and given the huge amount of hardware and applications software combinations out there, I guess it's to be expected. That having been said, my experience of the Vista rollout has been a lot smoother and easier than with XP, which was an insecure and unstable nightmare until SP2 came out. It took them almost two years after the consumer release to get XP solidly reliable: apart from this colour problem, Vista has worked with no significant glitches straight out of the box.  |  IP: Logged Damien Taylor Master Film Handler Posts: 493 From: Perth, Western Australia Registered: Apr 2007 posted 09-09-2007 09:40 AM                     It's pretty poo that Microsoft stopped pressing xp instantly and didn't really give people a choice. I used 98SE for years into xp's reign and didn't miss out on much, except games... oh new versions of office, actually i don't think i could use anything i downloaded off the net either. Ninja edit: YES I'M AWARE I DON'T USE CAPITAL i'S  |  IP: Logged Joe Redifer You need a beating today Posts: 12859 From: Denver, Colorado Registered: May 99 posted 09-09-2007 05:16 PM                        Someday, when you grow up, you will be important enough in society to use capital i's.  |  IP: Logged Kevin Raisler Film Handler Posts: 52 From: Warsaw, IN, USA Registered: Jun 2003 posted 09-09-2007 07:51 PM                    I agree vista probably doesn't know how to manage your video card (driver) very well indeed. yet another reason to wait..  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.