|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: "CE3K" --- Happy 30th!
|
Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001
|
posted 11-16-2007 04:25 AM
"We are not alone."
On November 16, 1977, thirty years ago today, Steven Spielberg's "Close Encounters Of The Third Kind" was released. In one theatre, anyway.
Using a platform release strategy, Columbia Pictures opened "Close Encounters" on Wednesday, Nov. 16 at the ZIEGFELD THEATRE in New York City and two days later at the CINERAMA DOME in Los Angeles. The national release began in a couple-hundred theatres on Dec. 14.
I saw the movie at the CINEMA 70 in the Del Monte Shopping Center in Monterey, California. At the time I was a nine-year-old Army Brat (my parents were stationed at nearby Fort Ord). I slept through much of the movie but remember being awakened by the powerful musical score and overbearing sound during the film's finale. I can't say that I liked the movie at the time thinking it was rather slow and not as fun and enjoyable as "Star Wars." However, after seeing the film numerous times over the years on TV, various video formats and a few theatrical screenings, my current opinion is that I think it is a great movie and one of the best in Spielberg's illustrious career.
"Close Encounters" was nominated for eight Academy Awards, winning for Cinematography. In addition, it was awarded a special achievement Oscar for Sound Effects Editing. With a domestic boxoffice gross topping $100 million (in an era when $100 million defined a blockbuster), the film was the third-highest-grossing film released in 1977 ("Star Wars" and "Smokey And The Bandit" were one and two, respectively).
Among the original bookings were a couple-dozen 70-millimeter prints, most of which are identified below. These were, arguably, the best venues in which to experience the movie during that initial release.
RELEASED NOV. 16, 1977 New York, NY: Ziegfeld
RELEASED NOV. 18, 1977 Los Angeles, CA: Cinerama Dome
RELEASED DEC. 14, 1977 Belleville, IL: BAC Cinema Bloomington, MN: Southtown Boston, MA: Cinema 57 Calumet City, IL: River Oaks Chicago, IL: Esquire Costa Mesa, CA: South Coast Plaza Denver, CO: Cooper Evergreen, IL: Evergreen Fort Worth, TX: Ridglea Honolulu, HI: Waikiki 3 Houston, TX: Alabama Houston, TX: Town and Country Village Lakewood, CA: Lakewood Center Little Rock, AR: Cinema 150 Livonia, MI: Mai Kai Los Angeles, CA: Paramount (move-over from Cinerama Dome) Louisville, KY: Showcase Cinemas Orange, CA: Cinedome Paramus, NJ: Route 4 Triplex Pasadena, CA: Hastings Philadelphia, PA: Sameric Pittsburgh, PA: Warner Pittsford, NY: Pittsford Triplex Portland, OR: Eastgate Salt Lake City, UT: Regency San Diego, CA: Cinema 21 San Francisco, CA: Coronet Santa Clara, CA: Cinema 150 Skokie, IL: Old Orchard Southfield, MI: Americana Southgate, MI: Southgate Toledo, OH: Showcase Cinemas West Allis, WI: Southtown
RELEASED DEC. 21, 1977 Monterey, CA: Cinema 70 Palm Springs, CA: Camelot Portland, OR: Town Center Santa Barbara, CA: Granada
(Since I seem to be the resident "listmaniac," maybe before the year is over, just for Mike Heenan, I'll do up a "Smokey And The Bandit" tribute and will list the venues that showed it in "Bandit Vision"! )
So...who else has any memories of seeing "Close Encounters" way back when? Anyone prefer one of the recut versions over the original?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 11-16-2007 08:31 AM
I saw it on it's opening weekend in RKO Stanley Warner Route 4 Triplex Paramus NJ. We waited in line for over an hour. The film opened in the "big" auditorium, which held around 1000 people. Almost every show that weekend was sold out. I liked the film, but I too thought Star Wars was better (still do).
I do like the 1980 special edition better. The original version's mental breakdown went on way too long. By the time he was playing with the mashed potatos, I had enough. Trimming the excess and adding some nice touches such as the UFO shadows across the fields improved the film greatly. This is one of the few films that I felt the directors cut was better than the original.
On the other hand, as Richard Dryfuss was boarding the ship at the end, I kept thinking of the Twilight Zone "To Serve Man"...
Just a FYI, although newspaper advertising at the time refered to the theatre as the Route 4 Triplex, at the time the complex consisted of 2 seperate buildings, and the signage refered to one as The Stanley Warner, which was the original theatre that had it's balcony walled off to make a twin, and The Route 4 Cinema which was built from the ground up years later. Each had it's own entrance, boxoffice, projection, etc.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God
Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 11-16-2007 08:59 AM
One of my favorite of all time. The opening sequence with the soundtrack orchestra building to that one bombastic chord took my breath away. The special added subs that were added (at Columbia's own cost, I was told) sure did enhance the experience; the whole theatre vibrated -- you could feel it in the pit of your stomach when the big mother ship decended.
Funny thing is, it seems like it was only a few years ago, certainly not 30, when I saw it at the Ziegfeld. It was only opened for a few weeks and I went back over and over again, dragging everyone I knew to see it. I saw it at least four times at the Zieg.
And I ran it just two weeks ago for a few friends and it still stands up incredibly well as a terrific piece of story-telling. And special effects -- hey, there are as good if not better than some of the glitzy fluff stuff today, and they got it all with nary a CGI frame to be found anywhere.
Interesting thing was, the kid in the film looked like a clone of my nephew who was about the same age at the time. He is now nearly a head taller than me.
What is really scary, is that it was 30 years ago.....it boggles the mind, this time-warp compression we are caught in.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|