|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Author
|
Topic: I Hate Family Guy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Damien Taylor
Master Film Handler
Posts: 493
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: Apr 2007
|
posted 01-13-2008 04:56 AM
Let me say from the outset, I completely empathize with you Joe.
The downfall of most pop culture reference driven shows is that they tend to be shit. Family Guy is no exception.
We were all there Seth. We all get it. Thundercats, Paula Abdul, A-Ha etc..., very clever of you to remember them, did you do it all by yourself? (obviously not, there used to be some kind of retard army)
Fat Guy: Actually, this kind of reminds me of the time I got a lot of TV and pop culture references on the verge of being forgotten then made a pastiche of them in the guise of a character based cartoon, and it was vaguely funny for like 5 minutes.
Stupid Baby: Then wot happened lawl? (apparently talking gay is funny now?)
Fat Guy: We got canceled, then some facial bumfluff teenagers who downloaded all the episodes in 100x100 res, learnt to write, then made a petition to bring us back. Apparently it turns out Fox isn't stupid, so we got a movie instead.
Seth Green's beyond irritating character thing: What was the movie like?
Fat Guy: Extremely lame and annoying.
The worst character in the show; Dog: I'm already sick of this show.
Sexual predator neighbor: I've become a pop culture meme! Gabbity Gabbity Goo.
Words simply cannot explain the contempt I have for this show, it simply is just awful. I cannot fathom how I used to like it. It is just dribble of the worst calibre.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000
|
posted 01-14-2008 02:28 PM
quote: Tim Reed But, as with The Simpsons, these "adult" cartoons have a tendency to be sacrilegious
Actually, much of the christian community doesn't have a problem with The Simpsons, because their portrayal of christians (like Flanders) as honest, decent people that help others out regardless of cost to them is appealing.
Back to the original point, Family Guy has such inferior writing that I don't get why people love it, but like Trey Parker and Matt Stone said in an interview, it seems like Family Guy's writers have the talent to make a good show, they just choose not to for some reason like they're just lazy or something. They will stumble across a good joke from time to time, but what you have to filter through to get there is not worth it.
Mike - I agree with Dane Cook not being funny. And he's a joke stealer.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Brian Michael Weidemann
Expert cat molester
Posts: 944
From: Costa Mesa, CA United States
Registered: Feb 2004
|
posted 01-15-2008 06:37 AM
Me, I was a huge fan during its first, original run. I laughed aloud, and pop references of decades past were more sparse, more clever, and more unlike anything else I watched. It was the DVD sales after its cancellation that brought it back, and it came back strong. But I rarely found myself laughing aloud anymore.
When the Seinfeld sitcom ended, I recall Jerry saying that it was its time, that the characters had become caricatures of themselves. The comedy got a little stale. In my opinion, Family Guy, while once original with an underlying wit, just hit its stale point too soon. And, in the nature of the show, stretching a joke indefinitely without adding any actual new joke content, isn't always funny.
In all fairness, this was never a show I could really enjoy in clips out of context. That's difficult to appreciate because the entire show is a hodgepodge of clips out of context. However, the nonlinearity worked for it. Like minimalist music, it may be boring in brief excerpts, but that just means you haven't heard enough of it yet. It was surreal, and the fun came from the completely unexpected turns you didn't see coming (as opposed, of course, to those unexpected turns you fully expect).
Once you start to see the turns, it's a dull drive and you're asking "are we there yet?"
Have I mixed too many metaphors?
These days, I don't watch ANY television.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|