Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » LP'S & other records masterd in magnetic 35 or 70 mm

   
Author Topic: LP'S & other records masterd in magnetic 35 or 70 mm
Matthew Bailey
Master Film Handler

Posts: 461
From: Port Arthur,TX
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 01-24-2008 04:53 AM      Profile for Matthew Bailey   Email Matthew Bailey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not certain if to leave this topic here on in Film Yak.
Anyone have any LP's,or Cd releases of albums or other records mastered in magnetic 35 or 70 mm? I've seen some online & some of the mastering processes used 3 track Westrex dubbers used for some such records but for some people who didn't have a magnetic film dubber or couldn't afford any, did some who mastered a record using magnetic film use a 35 or 35/70 projector with a mag penthouse & do the described mastering on that manner?

 |  IP: Logged

Jeff Stricker
Master Film Handler

Posts: 481
From: Calumet, Mi USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 01-24-2008 05:41 AM      Profile for Jeff Stricker   Email Jeff Stricker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Back in the '60s a company named Command Records realeased a number of titles that were originally mastered on 35mm magnetic film. One of the first titles was "Stereo 35mm". I used to own a copy of the lp, but alas, its lost to the ages. Another company "Everest" also used 35mm mastering --- I think mostly classical stuff.

 |  IP: Logged

Rick Raskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1100
From: Manassas Virginia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 01-24-2008 06:29 AM      Profile for Rick Raskin   Email Rick Raskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I may still have a copy of "Stereo 35mm" and a few of the other releases. They are in boxes under the steps waiting transfer to CD (Right!).

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-24-2008 07:10 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The idea, valid or not so valid, was that all things being equal, recordings mastered on 35mm fullcoat should have better dynamic range with lower signal-to-noise than conventional magnetic tape and tape recorders at the time, those supposedly better specs due to the speed at which the fullcoat travels and because of the larger heads and tracks. I always thought that was much more a marketing gimmic than any real sound improvement.

I had a few of the LPs that claimed the "audiophile" sound due to 35mm film, but found they were no better or no worse than LPs produced on standard tape decks. Especially those were beginning to incorporate Dolby NR recording electronics. In fact, I found one of the LPs had sound that was mastered much too hot -- I could hear the damn clipping. So be it an Ampex tape deck or a Magnatech dubber, if the guy at the mixing console is high on pot or just untalented -- it won't matter; he can still make the final product sound like crap. It's a law of nature....holds just as true today be it CDs or DVDs.

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 01-24-2008 07:21 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At Bletchley Park, the Wartime codebreaking place near London, where the Projected Picture Trust have much of their collection, and a small cinema, there is also a computer museum. There is some sort of early computer there that uses 35mm mag film for data storage, rather than tape.

I've also seen a very strange sound recorder, which was exhibited at various shows around the country by somebody who had a collection of various old sound recording devices. This one recorded by cutting a grrove in 35mm film The film was a few hundred feet long, and was spliced into an endless loop. The cutter head slowly moved across the width of the film, so that many grooves were cut side by side. I've never seen this thing actually working, so I don't know how fast the film ran, or how long it could record, but it should have been able to do much longer than either a 78 r.p.m. disk, or optical recording on a roll of film, the only real alternatives at the time. I can see several problems; you couldn't edit the recording, the film would have to slide over itself in the coil, as with the old Technicolor 8mm loop projectors in the '60s and '70s, and I wouldn't like to think about the effect of a splice going through.

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Brown
Film Handler

Posts: 86
From: Ceredigion, Wales, UK
Registered: Jul 2005


 - posted 01-24-2008 11:35 AM      Profile for Peter Brown   Email Peter Brown   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, I've got a bunch of LPs (and the re-released CDs) from Mercury Living Presence who did a lot of their recording on 35mm. Quite stunning sound, but their recording engineer, Bob Fine was very close to being a genius...

Here are some details:

http://www.deccaclassics.com/music/mercurylivingpresence/about.html

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan M. Crist
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 531
From: Hershey, PA, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 01-24-2008 11:52 AM      Profile for Jonathan M. Crist   Email Jonathan M. Crist   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have several of the Command albums which were also released on 4 Track Reel-To-Reel Tape. The playback of those tapes is stunning even today.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 01-24-2008 01:21 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A long time ago when I was into high-end audio, I had an LP mastered from 35mm mag. I was not impressed. Maybe it was just a bad example.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 01-24-2008 02:11 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yea, "Madam of Mercury" Wilma Cozart and her 'future' Husband Bob Fine took Mercury to the limit with the introduction of three track, 35mm magnetic film recordings using Fairchild 35mm audio recorders. Then, George Piros did an absolute job using his great lathe techniques.

If anyone has any Merc Living Presense stereo vinyls (and even Command records vinyls since Cozart,Fine and Piros left Merc after Philips bought Merc out in 1962, with Fine and Piros going over to Enoch Light's new Command label), look in the deadwax area in the runout area and you'll see either a "P17" or a "P23". These pressings originated from either of these two favorite lathes of Piros.

(on the flip side, "Greatest Story Ever Told, - the on site mic recordings - were recorded in 3 track 35mm using the same Fairchild Recorders..)

Some "Fine" reading here about that empire from Chicago.
quote: Jonathan M. Crist
I have several of the Command albums which were also released on 4 Track Reel-To-Reel Tape. The playback of those tapes is stunning even today.
Prob why your open reels, duped at 7.5ips using a 4/1 transfer speed from those AMPEX 3200 duplicators from the production master, sounds good as the do-with the 35mm mastering that Bob Fine used in those Command sessions. -Monte

p.s. yes, this should have placed in the "Yak" section

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 01-24-2008 02:25 PM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Monte L Fullmer
Bob Fine took Mercury to the limit with the introduction of three track, 35mm magnetic film recordings using Fairchild 35mm audio recorders.
Is that the same Bob Fine that was behind Perspecta?

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 01-24-2008 03:30 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It could be since the two Fines did work with Fairchild products, but as for the definite answer, I can't answer that one.

 |  IP: Logged

Fred Georges
Master Film Handler

Posts: 257
From: Lombard, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 01-24-2008 05:44 PM      Profile for Fred Georges   Email Fred Georges   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yup, One & the same. You can google C.Robert Fine to get the skinny. Met Him in the 70's. Didn't have many kind words to say about "Perspecta" Even though He was a co-inventor & promoter. [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.