my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » BleuPrint Paper

Author Topic: BleuPrint Paper Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-18-2008 07:36 PM                     Ok here is an odd request I was looking at some very old blue prints aka 1928 vintage they were produced on the ferrocyanide paper of the day and water developed (blue background with white line work) and they were as clear as the day they were printed currently when I get prints run they are diazo blueline that are ammonia developed and they fade quickly in sunlight and get dirty on jobsites Is the old type paper still available  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 02-18-2008 08:01 PM                     I have doubts you can buy real blue print paper anymore. It could be over OSHA rules and such. Most architectural and engineering firms that make large prints use plotters and other electronic methods for duplicating plans. Likewise, that's about all you buy for "blue print" purposes - plotter paper.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-18-2008 08:06 PM                     I have a encad cadjet plotter and a gaf diazo blueline printer but often wondered if the "old technology was still available comercially In a book on drafting (pub 1869) that was in a great uncles estate has the recipe for making ferrocyanide paper (shich i did once in school as an experiment)  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 02-18-2008 08:28 PM                     The problem with classic blueprint paper is that the raw paper had a very limited shelf life and usually had to be used within days of production. They are extremely durable...I had a rehab project of a cinema in we relied on a 50+ year old set of prints for reference; they looked like they where made the day before. In my new office I still have my "antique" drafting table / Vemco arm, which has banged out hundreds of drawings,to update older drawings...but after I dust it off, aline the arm and sheets, the AutoCad usually gets used  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-18-2008 08:38 PM                     Richard my acad drafting station sits on the old drafting table  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-18-2008 08:55 PM                        I still have some of the original 1930 "blue paper" blueprints of the Roxy here. Outside of a few tears, they are in good condition. Thought about getting one framed or something, but the lines on them are so "fine" that it's nearly impossible to tell what it is unless you really know what to look for. They're really cool though.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-18-2008 09:16 PM                     Everything around here is black lines on white paper. There is a reprographics place a couple of blocks from our shop that has a large "copy machine like unit" that makes the prints in any size up to 30X36 right from the acad. file. Its so inexpensive to have them made that owning a plotter is not really worth the hassle and expense... There is no problem with fade or anything else on them either. Mark  |  IP: Logged Phil Hill I love my cootie bug Posts: 7595 From: Hollywood, CA USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 02-19-2008 12:38 AM                  My house was built in 1980 and I have the original Blueprints...They are in great condition. (Blue lines on white paper w/ blue tints and splotches now and then) This thread sorta reminds me of the long lost LaRue house blueprints from the film "Mousehunt".  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 02-19-2008 08:10 AM                     Usually the splotches where cause by dirty master drafting paper since many of the ammonia based systems shined a light through the paper for exposure. I was very good at selecting transparent tape for "paste up" revision of masters for a clean repro. I visited a major cinema equipment distributor in Europe around 10 years ago I expected autocad by their staff....but they where doing the same manual paste up due to comfort level  |  IP: Logged Barry Floyd Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1079 From: Lebanon, Tennessee, USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 02-19-2008 12:19 PM                        My day job here at the office is Civil Engineering. We occasionally still get in old "blue prints" (white lines on blue paper), but everything going out of our office is black lines on white paper. We do have an HP Designjet 800 series plotter - but we only use that machine for check prints and really small jobs. On most of our projects, we print from Microstation (Cad program) directly to a PDF file, then email the PDF set to the local printer who runs them out on a 24x36 Xerox machine. It's cheaper both in costs and time to send them out to be printed as opposed to doing them in house. We do still have an old ammonia based diazo machine in the back room, but we haven't even turned it on in a year or two.  |  IP: Logged John Walsh Film God Posts: 2490 From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way Registered: Oct 1999 posted 02-20-2008 08:01 AM                     Never used actual ‘blueprints,’ but have used ammonia based “Diazo” process for many years. Where I am now, there are drawings back to the 1940’s, and we use a Diazo machine to copy them. At a previous place I worked, there was also a ‘flatbed’ exposure table which would also suck the air from under the lid to ensure the paper laid flat. You used to be able to buy papers with different sensitivities, but many ‘grades’ have been discontinued. Nothing like getting a paper cut with sensitized paper!  |  IP: Logged Phil Hill I love my cootie bug Posts: 7595 From: Hollywood, CA USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 02-20-2008 05:09 PM                  When in High School, one of the jobs I worked was for an engineering firm. My job was to take an original hand-drawn vellum and make copies via the “Diazo” process. I always thought it was cool that the process was photographic. The yellow emusion "photographic" diazo paper came wrapped in a thick black plastic bag sealed to keep the light from exposing the paper. You'd place the original vellum in contact with the diazo paper and run it thru the machine to expose it under UV light. The 1st time it would have a yellow-line image of the original drawing. Then put that copy thru again for the "ammonia developing" to get the blue line copy on white paper. Of course the ammonia stunk to high heaven! YIKES!  |  IP: Logged Barry Floyd Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1079 From: Lebanon, Tennessee, USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 02-21-2008 11:41 AM                        At the other office I used to work at in Nashville, we used to hire high school kids in the summer months as "interns", and they basically just ran prints all day like Phil described. We once had a kid who decided he'd change the ammonia bottle by himself, and about killed us all. As he was changing out the bottles he dropped the new bottle off of the top of the print machine, it hit the floor busted open and spilled almost the entire gallon jug in the floor of the print room. We did have an exhaust hood over the machine, but it wasn't enough to handle that much ammonia. The whole building stunk like ammonia for a week.  |  IP: Logged Kenneth Wuepper Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1026 From: Saginaw, MI, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 02-21-2008 01:26 PM                     Barry, That odor also has "diaper" implications. This is the reason for the tightly sealed packaging of the unexposed paper. There is enough fume residue in the room to fog improperly stored paper. We also did color Diazo films in that process for use on overhead projectors in our classrooms. Exposure required a lot of UV light. Sometimes we used the arc lamp for burning printing plates to expose lots of cells at one time. KEN  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.