|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: The Importance of Shop Safety (VERY GRAPHIC PICS OF RECENT FATALITY!!)
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 04-24-2008 04:53 PM
The link didn't work for me, either, but I guess we're into the same issue as with the Budd Dwyer footage: do we need to see it to really take Will's point?
I remember being shown a 16mm educational film in school as part of a rail safety campaign called 'I'm Train Trained'. Having seen the film and heard the lecture from the visiting speaker who showed it, you got a badge with the slogan on it (I think I've still got mine, somewhere). Around 25 years later we took in a collection of educational films at the archive I worked for, including that one. It didn't leave anything to the imagination. The plot goes something like this: Irresponsible younger (male) sibling runs onto railway line to retrieve football, while responsible older sister warns him not to. He doesn't listen, and while he's on the track she sees a train bearing down on him in the distance. She runs onto the track to pull him off, and is electrocuted by the live rail as she does so. A split second later, her brother is run over by the train. Cue shots of mangled and burnt body parts which leave nothing whatsoever to the imagination, while a stern commentary warns viewers not to go anywhere near railway lines.
I suppose that film must have done the job its makers intended, because I can still remember it in that much detail, around 30 years after I first saw it.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays
Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 04-27-2008 12:48 AM
No, no, no... it's my library, my archive, that I have been licensing subjects from for TV shows, books, and documentaries for years. The same as Sabucat does for movie trailers, I do with intermission snipes. Someone can't take a transfer that Jeff made for a TV show and then have someone else use that transfer in something else without his permission. That's how stock libraries work - we're not dealing with rights to the title, but rather mechanical rights to the source material.
FWIW, Archive.org has a rights management administrator.
Btw, while you may have some of the same snipes, I seriously doubt you have everything I do, or even everything pirated on that site. I've been collecting these things from numerous sources since the early 70s. Most of the titles in my collection I have not seen any other prints of, ever... and I've been through my share of drive-ins and stock libraries over the years.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 04-27-2008 05:31 AM
When you don't have rights to the original title, the problem is proving that the pirate used your source material, and didn't get it from somewhere else. At the last archive I worked for, someone put the contents of two DVDs we published on YouTube, minus two titles (about 10% of the total footage) which we owned the rights to as well as preserved the source elements. He also removed our specially commissioned music from one of the silent items. When we asked YouTube to take this stuff down, the individual refused, claiming that he'd transferred his own prints and that the matter was nothing to do with us. This was clearly BS, because they were clearly our transfers: all the scratches and jumps from the source elements were in the same place, and on two items we'd colour corrected the dye fading using Avid. If he'd transferred his own prints, then unless he had some pretty expensive hardware and software (this was in 2004, when low-end video software such as Premiere wasn't capable of very good results correcting dye fading), they would have looked pink as hell.
All we could do after that was to notify the third party copyright owners of the original material (who'd given us permission to publish the DVD, but not for this person to put them on YouTube), but they didn't think it was worth their while or cost to get lawyers on the case.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays
Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 04-27-2008 09:15 AM
Leo, that is true. The thing I've been banking on is the scratches, emulsion scortches, and splices all match up to my prints. They are as unique as thumb prints and should be as good as a watermark. It probably won't work out that way, but I'm going to try.
In fact, that was always in the back of my mind when I originally loaned this material to the producer of the video series from which it has been copied. I figured these anomalies could be used to positively identify my material. I should've taken the high road, however, and just corner keyed the 3/4" masters.
Today, however, anything I put on video now has some type of identifying watermark. I've had too much good stuff go out the window with just that one video series. It has lessened the value of my original prints.
Btw, sorry to hijack your thread, Will.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|