|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Cinespia Cemetery screenings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God
Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 07-21-2008 03:32 AM
We still run film; the Barcos were purchased because this venue does a lot of esoteric stuff from independent filmmakers (videomakers, to be more precise) and we needed to have the flexibility. We will still run film for everything that we can get on film. They had to do ENTER THE DRAGON with this particular event because it was a commissioned score and live accompaniment. I wasn't directly involved with this event because it was more about the commissioned work.
I am assuming that it had to be on video because they had to make a version that was dialog and effects elements only, sans the original music track. The musicians played their score live with the film and the video only had the dialog and effects only.
All I can say is, it was a terribly botched job. Whoever "authored" the DVD did so without knowing what they were doing. We got a DVD that was both letterboxed and pillared, i.e., there was black on the side of the image as well as top and bottom with a small image sitting in the center of the raster, black all around it. The image had to be enlarged so it would fill the 55ft wide screen top to bottom. Even with loosing all that light from the black areas without image, the Barcos produced a passable amount of light -- probably in the 10-12ftL range -- I've seen DIs with a darker image.
My guess is that with a proper video source such as blue-ray, video might it will look quite good.
This halfbaked DVD image that was handed to us had so much video garbage -- shimmer on all horizontal lines, pixals clearly visible, and add to that, it seemed to be time-compressed -- any horizontal movement created this stuttering effect, making it look like frames were being dropped; if I suffered from epilepsy, I would be on the floor in convulsions -- I can't watch that artifact....it makes me crazy.
One of the technicians asked me how I thought it looked -- I answered, if it were 35mm film, I would be frantically trying to focus the projector....and that's from our 110ft distance from the screen. I feel sorry for the audience who sat closer than our control tower, but at least the first rows don't start for about 30 ft. from the screen; and there is an equal number of people sitting behind our booth, so they are quite a distance. It would look really good if they were sitting in Staten Island.
In short, it was very hard to assess the quality of the Barcos without a decent hi-rez source. I will try to get a blu-ray DVD and player over there next week so after our screening of POWAQQZTSI (35mm), I'll be able to feed a high quality video source to the stacked Barco R6+'s and see what they can really can do.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|