Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Harry Potter and the R-Rated Half-Blood Prince? (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Harry Potter and the R-Rated Half-Blood Prince?
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-23-2008 05:50 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
According to the trailer insert that came with our print of "Marley and Me," the next Potter film is rated R for "some sequences of violence and language."

Personally I think it's a misprint. We didn't get the actual trailer so I couldn't check the rating band on the trailer, can anyone verify that the film is actually (probably) rated PG-13?

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-23-2008 06:11 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It'd have to be PG-13. An R rated HP would be the dumbest idea of the not-even-here-yet new year.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-23-2008 06:22 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think Warner Bros. took a fairly serious risk allowing the last two Harry Potter installments to be rated PG-13. Harry Potter isn't G-rated fare, but still the target audience for this stuff is mostly pre-teen kids.

I agree it would be beyond astonishingly stupid for the next Harry Potter movie to be made with a R-rated cut. It would even be far more stupid than the toned down PG-13 sequels of movies with R-rated originals.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 12-23-2008 06:25 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Remember the books were written with the increasing age of her children in mind. Therefore they will continue to get deeper and deeper toward R. (X?) Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-23-2008 07:26 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That may be true. However, most kids tend to grow out of the Harry Potter type of thing as they get farther along in their teens. Meanwhile, the children still in elementary school and perhaps middle school remain to be the most valuable demographic in the business of selling Harry Potter books and movies.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 12-23-2008 08:35 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
The MPAA does not have a rating posted on the ratings website yet.

Come to think of it, I haven't received a weekly ratings email since July. WTH?

 |  IP: Logged

Caleb Johnstone-Cowan
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 593
From: London, UK
Registered: Mar 2006


 - posted 12-23-2008 09:20 PM      Profile for Caleb Johnstone-Cowan   Email Caleb Johnstone-Cowan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well an R rating would be commercial suicide. I'm sure loads of people already got screwed over by the date change.

Is a PG-13 rating for these films really a bad thing? I would have thought cutting out the younger kids from shows that (for us at least) will definitely sell out anyway on opening weekend means a higher average ticket price and more potential impulse food buying customers. Also it's not a leap in to the unknown for the younger children as many will have read the book already.

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 12-23-2008 09:24 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Also, I think it's too soon for it to be rated, I can't imagine it's done yet. Nothing listed at www.cara.org, and the trailer on trailers.apple.com has no rating as of yet.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Kurt Zupin
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 989
From: Maricopa, Arizona
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 12-23-2008 09:43 PM      Profile for Kurt Zupin   Email Kurt Zupin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They said the film was done when they decided to not release it. They were going to use the extra time to do some extra cg work

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-23-2008 10:57 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: John Hawkinson
Also, I think it's too soon for it to be rated, I can't imagine it's done yet.
The film is in the can, according to a WB guy in an article I read in Entertainment Weekly. So it could be rated, but I've not been able to find any reference to said rating anywhere, except on the Marley trailer insert, which could very well be mistaken. If it really IS rated R, the headlines should start screaming it any day now.

 |  IP: Logged

Carey Barber
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 143
From: Newport News, VA, USA
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 12-24-2008 01:34 PM      Profile for Carey Barber   Email Carey Barber   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Most likely just a typo...

Our most recent trailer programming sheet also listed Night at the Museum 2 as R-rated. Obviously, that is not correct.

 |  IP: Logged

John Lasher
Master Film Handler

Posts: 493
From: Newark, DE
Registered: Aug 2001


 - posted 12-24-2008 02:47 PM      Profile for John Lasher   Author's Homepage   Email John Lasher   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's what might have happened:

Freddie is typing up the trailer sheet, he shouts down the hall to Jimbo, who has the actual trailers in front of him.

FREDDIE
Yo, Jimbo! Wus da ratin' on dat new Harripodder treller?

JIMBO
It's NR! [Not Rated]

FREDDIE
An "R"?

JIMBO
Yeah, man, NR!

FREDDIE (to himself as he types)
OK, it's an "R".
(yelling to Freddie)
How 'bout Night At Da Museum?!

JIMBO
Dat's NR, too!

FREDDIE
"R-2"?!

JIMBO
No, just NR, man!

FREDDIE
Okay, an "R".

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Bedford
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 597
From: Telluride, CO, USA (733 mi. WNW of Rockwall, TX but it seems much, much longer)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-24-2008 05:03 PM      Profile for Jim Bedford   Author's Homepage   Email Jim Bedford   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Good one John. Now who's on first? Jimbo

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-25-2008 05:20 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes. Who's on first...and What's on second.

 |  IP: Logged

Dick Vaughan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1032
From: Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 12-26-2008 03:48 PM      Profile for Dick Vaughan   Author's Homepage   Email Dick Vaughan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Latest UK Half Blood Prince trailers ( 21 Nov 2008) are rated 12A and PG

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.