|
|
Author
|
Topic: Are the Super Bowl 3D spots a huge miscalculation?
|
|
|
|
Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008
|
posted 01-31-2009 02:30 AM
I guess us humans never learn and history is bound to repeat itself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDZbeyTdSUU
For once, this is not the first Super Bowl commercial in "3D". It was done before with pulfrich (Nuoptix) glasses some +20 years ago. TV has had a history of ads in 3D (anaglyph or pulfrich) and even TV shows (more recently 3rd rock from the sun and Medium, i.e.)
http://www.film-tech.com/ubb/f1/t004742.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvFOjagmCwY
For seconds, the usual lack of clear communication is making the consumers go ¿huh? Just wait to see the amazing number of people that are going to sit in front of the TV wearing their (realD) 3D glasses from Bolt and go ... ¿huh?
They are marketing this Monsters movie as being in Imax 3D, RealD 3D, Intel InTrue 3D and Colorcode 3D if you push me. They usually require different glasses: linear-Imax, circular-Real, no-such-thing-really-but-animators-often-use-shutter-glasses, modified anaglyph-Colorcode.
Just wait for the number of people showing at the movie theaters with their SuperBowl glasses in their hands to watch Monsters and refuse to pay the 3D surcharge claiming they already have the glasses ...
They are, once again, using the old cliché of "not in your old parent's red-blue glasses system". No. This time is blue-and-orange/brown.
Anyway. Colorcode is indeed nothing new and there've been a couple of DVD's releases using it long ago. Just a perfected anaglyph system that, like anything else 3D, can yield good results under certain conditions if extreme care is used, but that like most anaglyph systems, it basically and generally suxs.
It has happened in the 80's. Someone figures the big bucks is in selling millions (125 million for the SuperBowl ads) of 3D glasses for home viewing and convinces some TV station or someone that a 3D showing will bring in "2, 3 times the amount of viewers". It gets done, viewers are dissapointed at the modest (if at all) 3D effect, feel cheated for a while, and forget about it 10 years later. Except some 10% of the viewers that, for whatever reason, just love it and get "hooked" to the 3D effect and want more and start blogs about how RealD is going to take over the world in 3 years.
Of course, after 30 years technology improves and allows for good (better) results to be obtained easier. Before digital filmaking and DI, like in the 80's, everything had to be done optical and "in one take", w/o room for mistakes and having to wait for dailies to check the results. Now, digital cameras are small, offer tremendous flexibility and inmediate results.
We won't even talk about CGI generated stuff ... the flexibility is total as there is no 3D camera at all to begin with ...
Also, digital transmission etc allows for finer control of the end results. So there are technological improvements, but make no mistake. There is nothing new about the 3D of the 00's and 10's ... it's the same old thing except that before it took a lot of expertise and care and effort to do it right, and therefore it was often done wrong, while today it's almost just "pushing a button", so even a monkey can "do it right". Although someone always manages to do it wrong no matter what ... [ 01-31-2009, 03:33 AM: Message edited by: Julio Roberto ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|