Film-Tech Cinema Systems
  Home     Products     Store     Forum     Warehouse     Contact Us    
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Annoying movie posters. (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Annoying movie posters.
Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009

- posted 12-06-2009 03:54 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If I ever see a job going as Movie Poster Designer, I may just apply. Surely it can't be too hard? All one needs are two standard things going by current traditions.

  • First and foremost is of course, Trajan type font. This is a given.
  • Second, and more important, is a male star with a gormless look on his dial.
Now granted, the two movie posters which leave me absolutely cold don't use the Trajan type font, but they do excel in the "Gormless Grin" look.
These are the posters for "Hudson Hawk" (1991) with Bruce Willis and the current release for "The Informant!" (2009) with Matt Damon.

I didn't mind Hudson Hawk all that much, it was ok for what it was- and I have yet to see The Informant (note to typesetter- DON'T forget the "!") so I am unable to comment.

.....but what is it with the dopey grin?

I can imagine the Actor Wanted ad now..."Actor wanted- must be great with the Grin - able to sustain big close up for one sheets- shiny teeth and lop sided jaw thrusts prefered"

There must be other annoying movie posters out there.

A penny for your thoughts.....more thoughts, more pennys.

 |  IP: Logged
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001

- posted 12-06-2009 04:24 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Most movie posters these days suck out loud for a variety of reasons, not just the continuing overuse of Trajan (or Trajan Pro), the "Arial" of movie poster typefaces.

Movie posters formerly used a great deal of illustration. Artists like Bob Peak and Drew Struzan put out a lot of great movie posters throughout the 1970s and the 1980s. Lots of classic movies featured illustrative paintings.

Today, we just have Photoshopped close up photographs of one actor's melon. Or we have a Photoshopped collage of actor heads. Most movie posters today are forgettable shit. Many are already designed for the tiny DVD/Blu-ray case cover rather than the 27" X 41" one sheet format.

I think the marketing arms of movie studios just have guys pump out about 40 or so movie poster comps. They focus group the hell out of it and then committee it to death so they can boil the poster concept down to the most safe and forgettable design possible. The days of an art director hiring an illustrator and having him create something pretty cool looking seem to be over. Now it's just cut and paste bullshit. Formulaic, assembly line garbage. It's about as far from "art" as it gets. The boring nature of contemporary movie posters reminds me of how so many cars look anger inspiring boring. Design by committee often just sucks. The results are almost always safe, forgettable bullshit.

Same goes for the type. Whatever fonts come bundled in an Adobe Creative Suite will often be used, with Trajan at the top of the list.

Logos? How often does a movie have an actual logo these days? Rarely if ever. Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Apocalypse Now, Back to the Future and even shitty movies like Xanadu had nifty looking logos on their posters. Today we just have type.

Avatar has somewhat unique looking lettering, but I suspect someone just brought up that Papyrus typeface and floated it around before someone finally tweaked it. The Matrix? Crap. It's just Times New Roman fractured up a bit in Adobe Illustrator. The tiny Japanese Katagana characters scrolling vertically in the background are more interesting.

The sucksational quality of movie posters today is merely another symptom of Hollywood studios concentrating far more on home video than giving a movie a proper start in commercial movie theaters.

quote: Ian Parfrey
.....but what is it with the dopey grin?
Matt Damon plays something of a naive dumbass in The Informant!

 |  IP: Logged
Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001

- posted 12-06-2009 05:38 PM      Profile for Mitchell Dvoskin   Email Mitchell Dvoskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There is an excellent documentary that PBS airs every now and again called The Man Who Drew Bug-Eyed Monsters. It is the biography of artist Reynold Brown, who always dreamed of being a serious western landscape painter, but spent most of his life creating movie posters for monster and horror movies in the 1950's and 60's to support his family.

 |  IP: Logged
Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002

- posted 12-06-2009 06:03 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tell us how you really feel, Bobby. [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99

- posted 12-06-2009 06:24 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The new trend that bothers me these days is posters that DON'T have the title on them at all. The first one I saw was the 1985-ish BATMAN movie -- just had the bat-logo. Current offenders are the next TOY STORY movie (which the posters just have "3" on them). WTF don't they put the name of the movie they are advertising on the posters?? This would seem to be Marketing 101 stuff.

 |  IP: Logged
Mark Ogden
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 943
From: Little Falls, N.J.
Registered: Jun 99

- posted 12-06-2009 06:43 PM      Profile for Mark Ogden   Email Mark Ogden   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mitchell Dvoskin
artist Reynold Brown
Probably the greatest sci-fi one-sheet artist ever, so long as you didn't expect the film to live up to the artwork. His classic poster for Attack of the 50-Foot Woman is one of the truly iconic examples of the genre. Every once in awhile, to this day, you see a magazine cover or piece of newspaper art that is based on it.

-

 |  IP: Logged
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001

- posted 12-06-2009 07:06 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In one of the extras on the Blu-ray of Monsters vs. Aliens a wall poster is in the background with the character Susan/"Ginormica" posed in the same manner as the Attack of the 50 Foot Woman poster art.

Dreamworks chose something far more conventional for the Monsters vs. Aliens one sheet.

 |  IP: Logged
Jeremy Jorgenson
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1002
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Feb 2005

- posted 12-07-2009 07:31 PM      Profile for Jeremy Jorgenson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeremy Jorgenson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
The new trend that bothers me these days is posters that DON'T have the title on them at all. The first one I saw was the 1985-ish BATMAN movie -- just had the bat-logo. Current offenders are the next TOY STORY movie (which the posters just have "3" on them). WTF don't they put the name of the movie they are advertising on the posters?? This would seem to be Marketing 101 stuff.
They are advertising the movie, not the title, right? I can't imagine that there is any confusion about what the Toy Story 3 teaser posters are advertising. Plus, these are just teasers. I was 13 when the first Tim Burton Batman was released in 1989. I definitely knew what the Batman symbol was, and which movie it represented, I didn't need the title written on the poster for me to figure it out. Now, if The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans poster just showed Mr. Cage & said something like "BL2" or something stupid not giving the title, then I'd be in agreement with you.

 |  IP: Logged
Caleb Johnstone-Cowan
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 593
From: London, UK
Registered: Mar 2006

- posted 12-08-2009 06:22 AM      Profile for Caleb Johnstone-Cowan   Email Caleb Johnstone-Cowan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cloverfield used the lack of a name on the poster to great effect. Got everyone guessing, along with the brilliant trailer.

What really annoys me is when the 'teaser' materials you get ages in advance look far superior to the final posters. Two recent examples are A Christmas Carol and Avatar, I didn't want to put the new stuff up and didn't bother with the latter, the new Avatar poster sucks.

I have started to prefer banners to posters internally. At my last work I actually stopped putting up posters for anything other than limited release films, because with Hollywood features the banners and standees looked a lot better than the posters do.

 |  IP: Logged
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99

- posted 12-08-2009 11:17 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jeremy Jorgenson
They are advertising the movie, not the title, right? I can't imagine that there is any confusion about what the Toy Story 3 teaser posters are advertising. Plus, these are just teasers.
My point is, why NOT put the title of the movie on? What would it HURT their marketing campaign by putting the well-known Toy Story logo on there, instead of just a big "3" on a black background? The only clue that it's a Toy Story movie is the slogan, "No toy gets left behind" which, if you're not already a fan of the series, means nothing.

The most recent of this silliness is the Alvin & the Chipmunks 2 posters, which simply have the words "the squeakuel" on them. But at least they have the Chipmunks characters so it's not quite as bad.

 |  IP: Logged
Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99

- posted 12-08-2009 11:51 AM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Remember, the target audience is post-literate. Words just clutter things up. Marketing is everywhere, so I assume the assumption is by the time they see a poster in a theatre, the target audience already knows what it is for and are just having their appetite whetted and reinforced.

Or, they just think they look cooler that way [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged
Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002

- posted 12-08-2009 08:44 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I actually like the "3" poster for Toy Story.

 |  IP: Logged
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000

- posted 12-09-2009 01:22 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just for the heck of it, here's a link to an international poster collection wiki page I worked on for Ponyo, Hayao Miyazaki's latest animated film, which had a short 800-screen run here a couple of months ago. Some critics knocked the US poster (by Disney, Ponyo's US distributor) for using CG elements in a poster for a defiantly old-fashioned hand-drawn 2D cel-animation film.

http://www.nausicaa.net/wiki/Ponyo_on_the_Cliff_by_the_Sea_(posters)

 |  IP: Logged
Dennis Benjamin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1445
From: Denton, MD
Registered: Feb 2002

- posted 12-09-2009 01:31 PM      Profile for Dennis Benjamin   Author's Homepage   Email Dennis Benjamin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
While we are on this subject:

Is it me - or did a majority of the Pixar/Disney releases NEVER actually release regular one sheets for thier films?

MONSTERS INC.
CARS
THE INCREDIBLES
UP
FINDING NEMO

I never saw actual regular posters for these films, with all the credit info at the bottom. I know that at my theatres, we would recieve what I would call a 'teaser' and then never get anything else. When I would call the production houses, they would tell me that what I got was the only poster released.

?

 |  IP: Logged
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001

- posted 12-09-2009 02:01 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Pixar doesn't give the sort of "top billing" or other mention of the voice talent (and other talent) in its movies. They don't do that with their movie posters. Come to think of it, Pixar doesn't do that with their movies either. You just get the title at the front of the movie and all the credits at the end.

 |  IP: Logged


All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
- Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.