Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Restoring Photo Printed on Textured Paper

   
Author Topic: Restoring Photo Printed on Textured Paper
Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-08-2010 02:49 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've been working on restoring this photo for a couple of days. It's part of a project I was asked to do by a friend. I got all the other pictures taken care of but this one has been a bitch to fix up.

It was printed on textured paper and I can't figure out how to get that "golf ball" pattern out of the scanned result.

Here's the original:
 -
(Don't laugh! It was taken in the 70's! [Wink] )

I'm not worried about the color. I can correct for that. I'm not even going to bother dicking around with color if I can't get the pattern out of the image.

If you look closer you can see the texture:
 -

I've tried all sorts of things: Gaussian blur, Median and all kinds of layer blending to get it out. The best I can do is this:
 -

But that is only a little better than if I scanned it at 2 or 3 times the intended final resolution then scaled it down to the final picture:
 -

I have read on the internet where people have used Fourier Transform filters to remove some artifacts but I'm not prepared to pay for a Phososhop plugin that might not work.

Any ideas?

 |  IP: Logged

Kenneth Wuepper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1026
From: Saginaw, MI, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 01-08-2010 03:28 PM      Profile for Kenneth Wuepper   Email Kenneth Wuepper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Randy,

Instead of scanning the photo, try re-photographing it with diffused light. In other words, try to eliminate the surface of the paper while capturing the image.

I have had some success using a white paper cone between the camera lens and the table top, like a tent with he lens at the top. Light the cone as evenly as possible and then photograph the result. I think you will be better off starting with this method.

KEN

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 01-08-2010 03:52 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Kenneth.

You beat me to the punch. Lighting the photograph from many directions usually removes the tiny individual "shadows" caused by the textured surface. I like Kenneth's tent idea, or you could use artists paper as either a reflector/diffuser. Also try different lamp heights and directions- just basically fool around 'till the pattern gets reduced or eliminated. Take your pick, Randy. Both methods will work.

 |  IP: Logged

Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 01-08-2010 04:11 PM      Profile for Julio Roberto     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Good tips on difusing the light source.

I guess you tried the descreening option in your scanner's software to see if it works out in this case?

You can try out another descreening/fourier options as free demos to see if they work good enough before you decide on a purchase (if you think it's worthit).

http://www.descreen.net/

The "best" way to do it, considering you have the original, is to scan a white (or flat colored) area, like the margin around the picture, and use it to measure the pattern and its effect on the scan to then counter-act it with a custom filter.

But if you don't have an eternity in time and tools, then try out stuff like

http://retouchpro.com/tutorials/?m=show&id=185

and the free FFT filter http://www.3d4x.ch/swift/FFT_July2008.zip

Fast how-to video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9JMROsx3Iw

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Minichino
Master Film Handler

Posts: 350
From: Haskell, NJ, USA
Registered: Dec 2005


 - posted 01-08-2010 04:53 PM      Profile for Robert Minichino   Author's Homepage   Email Robert Minichino   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
An FFT filter is definitely what you want. Here's what I did with your example:

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-08-2010 10:45 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think I got it! [Smile]
(Or, at least, I have a breakthrough.)

 -

It was the FFT that I needed.
Thanks for the help, Julio and Robert. I just needed that extra bit of info so I could wrap my head around the process. Now I've got it figured out.

 -

(Now that I look again, the exposure and colors still need adjusted. Don't they?)
A bit more tweaking and I think I've got it licked! [Smile]

I was trying to use the descreen function on the scanner but it was only producing blurry images. I tried several screen settings and they all came out half-assed.

Once I got the idea of what the Fourier Transform did it got easier. Now I can practice and get it better. [Smile]

BTW: I want to do this the "right" way and rephotograph it but my digital camera is just a point and shoot. (Canon Digital Elph) My film camera, a Pentax Super Program, vintage 1985 has a busted display inside the viewfinder. I can either use it manually as if it was a K-1000 or I can put it on full-auto and let the camera guess at the exposure. For copy work, the "guess mode" won't work and I don't have a handheld light meter.

Anybody know where I can get an old Pentax repaired for cheap? [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Sean Weitzel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Vacaville, CA (1790 miles west of Rockwall)
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-09-2010 12:10 PM      Profile for Sean Weitzel   Email Sean Weitzel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cheap? probably not but done right? call this store in San Francisco and ask to talk to Vladimir: http://www.actioncamerasf.com/

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 01-09-2010 04:03 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Randy Stankey
I can either use it manually as if it was a K-1000
Ah, the venerable Pentax K 1000. I have one myself, bought from new and has never missed a beat in 35+ years. SLR done right. Its such a simple yet bombproof camera that has everything I need and none of the fluff.

As an aside, I was on a canoe trip to Cairns in Queensland Australia in 1986. There was 5 canoes with people from all over the world. At lunch, I whipped out the Pentax and spun off a series of shots of the event.

As I was reloading, a Japanese couple approached me and the gentleman asked me in broken English what I thought of the K1000, and I gave him my unbiased opinion.

He then smiled to me and said that it was he who designed that camera and was glad to hear my comments. We chatted for a short while, then on returning to the canoes we promptly had a battle of the paddles and I'm proud to say that we both ended up in the river from upturned canoes laughing like crazy. It was a trip I will never forget made all the more memorable for the chance meeting of a very talented man.

To this day I still use that camera and wont ever part with it....partly because it's been a faithful friend, and partly because I'll always remember that Japanese gentleman's smile.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-09-2010 04:24 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My brother has a K-1000. I suppose I could snag his camera for the job.

The K-1000 is the camera I learned with in high school. You can practically never go wrong with it. [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-09-2010 05:04 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How does one even go about installing that FFT plug-in? I just get an FFT_2008 folder with .8bt files in them. Dragging it to the Plug-ins folder does nothing.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-09-2010 05:18 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Make sure the plug-in is compatible with the version of Photoshop you're using.

The last couple or so versions of Photoshop, CS4 in particular, have been tricky in accommodating plug-ins designed to work with earlier versions of Photoshop. The same problem is evident with Illustrator too.

 |  IP: Logged

Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 01-09-2010 05:34 PM      Profile for Julio Roberto     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just dropped the .8bf files in the adobes photoshop\plug-ins folder (version cs4 11.0.1) and they appeared as "Fourier Transform" under Filters menu.

[Confused]

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-09-2010 06:27 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The "Free FFT" plugins Robert linked to don't run on Photoshop for Mac.

I had to search until I found "ImageJ" http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/

It is a free, cross-platform application that does mathematical image manipulations.

Tres geek.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-09-2010 07:35 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That is odd that plug-ins for the same application need to be platform specific.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.