|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Technicolor getting out of the film business?
|
Mike Blakesley
Film God
Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 01-28-2010 10:43 AM
Check out the sentence I bolded....what does this mean for us film folks?
From Variety Article
Technicolor made its name providing color cameras and prints for such Hollywood hits as 1937's 'A Star is Born.' Now it hopes to return to its roots, supporting digital-age moviemaking.
Like an aging movie franchise in need of a box office jolt, Technicolor is getting a reboot.
The 95-year-old Hollywood lab and technology company is shedding subsidiaries, returning to its roots as an on-set technology provider, branching out into new areas, extending its brand to consumer products, moving into a new HQ -- even getting a new logo.
And amid all this activity, it's offering Hollywood a mea culpa for its own recent "arrogance" and promising a new openness in its dealings with the industry.
"We were relying on our legacy and relying on the studios to trust us," chief marketing officer Ah-mad Ouri told Daily Variety. "That's not enough."
An iconic name in the business, Technicolor was associated with the color process used widely in many celebrated films over three decades including "The Wizard of Oz," "Singin' in the Rain" and "Fantasia." For years, the company has been quietly transforming itself from a film-focused lab to a company providing all manner of digital services, including digital intermediate and visual effects.
But along the way, it also acquired a slew of peripheral businesses far afield from its core. That, along with parent company Thomson's initial drive to stress its own brand over Technicolor's, diluted the value and meaning of the Technicolor name.
So starting today, Technicolor is launching a multipronged plan to revive its brand in the professional and consumer arenas.
Shareholders of Thomson, Technicolor's French parent, will vote in Paris today on whether to change the name of the entire conglom to Technicolor.
The rebranding of the parent company and the refocusing of Technicolor represent a rare victory for Old Hollywood over the forces of globalization. Thomson bought Technicolor in 2001 for $2.1 billion, a third of that paid in Thomson stock, and quickly set about rebranding it as "Thomson Techicolor." But that rebranding effort is now being reversed, with the support of CEO Frederic Rose, and power is shifting to California.
Thomson is a respected electronics manufacturer and an important builder of set-top boxes. But, "We chose the Technicolor name because it's most relevant to content creators and distributors," said Ouri, as those sectors will be the new focus of the company. Dropped from the mix: services for retailers and exhibitors.
As a result, company is selling broadcast equipment maker Grass Valley, cinema advertising company Screenvision, point-of-sale advertising firm PRN and digital signage provider Convergent.
Company will get a new logo reflecting its move away from film services. It will be unveiled next month.
Technicolor already took a financial hit selling its consumer electronics businesses. However, Ouri says Technicolor has been a strong contributor to Thomson's bottom line, even while Thomson has struggled with massive debt.
Ouri, based in Hollywood, recently became chief marketing officer for the entire company, and Rose now visits from Paris at least once a month.
Technicolor also is returning to its roots in production support. While it no longer needs to send engineers to wrangle its giant three-strip film cameras, its plans stress products and services like its "DP lights" system, which brought a common color-correction language to movies and video for the first time.
Cinematographer Daryn Okada, former three-term prexy of the ASC, said: "I think that the company, from the top down now, is being very responsive to filmmakers. It's being run as a very creative endeavor."
Okada also hailed a shift in Technicolor's thinking. "They're not taking a wait-and-see approach; they're taking a proactive approach."
Ouri admitted the company had become "inwardly focused" and suffered from its own "arrogance," having ignored partnership opportunities. He promises the new Technicolor will be more open to partnerships and cooperation with other companies, including camera makers and software developers.
Techicolor will also move to become a consumer brand for the first time. Plans include "ingredient branding" -- a "Powered by Technicolor" label in the vein of "Intel Inside" -- for products that use the company's color science, such as Web video.
Though Technicolor's history extends back nearly a century, some in the post-production community complained that it no longer remembered its own history, and so couldn't consistently draw on its own experience to help solve problems.
"I don't disagree," responded Ouri, "That's one of my challenges, to bring that awareness back."
The company's new HQ at Sunset-Gower Studios is part of that plan.
Okada said the company's various facilities used to each have their own workflows, but "Now that they have one fantastic central facility, there's dialogue among these people now."
Ouri said the company will be drawing on some of its longtime staffers and technologists, such as senior VPs Tim Reynolds and Dana Ross, to rebuild the company's sense of itself.
"These people are here," he said. "You cut them and they bleed Technicolor."
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher Seo
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 530
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 11-18-2010 09:02 PM
Link to Variety article
quote: Posted: Thu., Nov. 18, 2010, 3:04pm PT
Technicolor to shutter N. H'wood plant Company to consolidiate printing operations in Canada
By David S. Cohen
Technicolor has confirmed plans to shutter its North Hollywood release printing plant and consolidate all North American release print operations in Mirabel, outside Montreal.
Employees were gathered this morning and told the news, then sent home for the day. However a company spokesman said many will be back at work as soon as tomorrow.
Technicolor will continue to provide all front-end, pre-release services, including dailies, in Los Angeles, but numerous layoffs are likely to result from the closure of the printing plant.
A Technicolor spokesman told Variety "The accelerating growth of digital technology plus the 2011 expiration of our lease at the North Hollywood location has caused us to reassess its cost structure in light of an anticipated decline in feature film volume requirements. With North American digital penetration now exceeding 30%, film print volume requirements do not require the operational capacity afforded by our two facilities, North Hollywood and Mirabel, for release printing."
With the shift of printing to Mirabel, Technicolor will no longer strike release prints in the United States.
Company has begun talks with its North Hollywood union reps "to review options, to establish a cost-effective operation, given the state and trajectory of the film business.
"Any future action on our part will be contingent upon the outcome of those discussions."
Contact David S. Cohen at david.cohen@variety.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."
Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 11-19-2010 11:01 AM
While I think it is a great move to re-brand parent company Thomspon into the far more recognizable Technicolor name, I don't know how this jockeying is going to help the new "all digital" company grow in the professional, pro-sumer and consumer market places of content creation and playback. Those sectors are already crowded with numerous vendors and competing standards.
Managing color seems like an obvious target for Technicolor. But numerous companies are already doing that in various areas. Some like Adobe, Apple, X-Rite/Pantone, Autodesk, etc. are very well established. Is Technicolor going to try developing products to compete with them or come up with some new technology to make those software/hardware "front ends" work better?
Thompson makes various kinds of electronics, but this deal makes it sound like they will be making fewer items (with spinning off companies like Grass Valley Group). Is Technicolor going to try to work with various manufacturers of digital still cameras, video cameras and video projectors and HDTV sets to make color capture and display more consistent? Or will Technicolor just come up with another competing food chain of products?
I guess I'm having trouble figuring how the existing problem Technicolor is trying to solve to justify this new company direction.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|