|
|
 
|
|
Author
|
Topic: It had to happen: WB considering new "Wizard of Oz"
|
Mike Blakesley
Film God
Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 03-10-2010 08:47 PM
![[puke]](graemlins/puke.gif)
A new 'Wizard of Oz' could make its way down the Hollywood road
L. A. Times story
EXCLUSIVE: Fresh off Disney's massive success with Tim Burton's "Alice in Wonderland," Warner Bros. wants to remake another childhood classic. Like, really classic.
The studio is examining two existing "Wizard of Oz" projects, with an eye toward giving one of them a modern gloss and moving it toward the screen.
One project, called "Oz," currently lives at Warner's New Line label. It's being produced by Temple Hill, which is behind a little franchise called "Twilight," and has a script written by Darren Lemke, a writer on the upcoming "Shrek Forever After."
A second "Wizard of Oz" project, set up at Warners proper, skews a little darker -- it's written by "A History of Violence" screenwriter Josh Olson and focuses on a granddaughter of Dorothy who returns to Oz to fight evil. "Clash of the Titans" producer Basil Iwanyk and his Thunder Road Pictures are behind that one. ("Spawn" creator Todd MacFarlane is potentially involved in a producerial capacity, to give you some idea of the tone.)
While the idea of a new "Wizard of Oz" movie is said to be in the development, let's-bat-this-around stage, it's been advanced seriously enough on the lot that representatives for some of the top directors around Hollywood have been briefed.
The Judy Garland-starring "The Wizard of Oz" from 1939 -- we could give you the refresher on witches, tin men, Dorothy and everyone else, but really, do we need to? -- has been given alternative treatments before. There was the 1978 black-themed film adaptation of the stage play "The Wiz." And of course about six years ago came the Broadway adaptation of Gregory Maguire's "Wicked," an alternative story of girls, witches and Emerald City politics. The property proved a huge stage hit, prompting a film version that's in development at Universal and "Wanted" producer Marc Platt.
Audiences are likely to respond to the idea of a new silver screen "Wizard of Oz" with gusto ("at least the first one was good," said one colleague we told) or with horror, precisely because the original is such a classic.
WizBut for Warners, there's plenty of appeal in trying to take the story of Dorothy & Co. back to the big screen. For one, there's the bonkers $210 million global opening for "Alice," which shows that if you're trying to create a mega-blockbuster, one smart way to do it is to take a title people know and update it for the effects era. And there's a neat symmetry, since the Technicolor version of the classic film did for color in the movies what a lot of people say that "Avatar," "Alice" -- and now, perhaps, "Wizard" -- could do for 3-D in the movies.
With its Harry Potter series drawing to an end, Warners also likes the idea of a franchise, and "Wizard of Oz" and the many books L. Frank Baum wrote featuring many of the same characters (all of which are in the public domain) fit the bill nicely. And let's not forget the property's strong, young female protagonist, hugely in vogue now in the post -Twilight" and -"Alice" eras.
There could still be questions about the project's title (the book's "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz" is in the public domain but the movie's "The Wizard of Oz" is not; it's owned by MGM, whose library is partly owned by Warner Bros.). And then there's the matter of whether filmmakers would make the movie with musical elements, as the original, of course, did. Those questions aside, it could be the moneymaking formula.
Follow the yellow brick road. It's strewn with CGI, tent poles and 3-D. And, of course, a little green.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator
Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 03-10-2010 11:47 PM
They're going to screw this up, I just know it.
First off, nobody could pull this off better than McG. They must hire him as director. Miley Cyrus needs to play Dorothy, the dog from Beverly Hills Chihuahua should play Toto, The Rock as Tin Man, Lady Gaga as the Cowardly Lion and for racial diversity Martin Lawrence should play the scarecrow.
To ensure box office success, the wicked witch of the west should be played by none other than Academy Award Winner, Meryl Streep (so they can say "and Academy Award Winner..." in the trailer).
Finally, the Jonas Brothers should be digitally multiplied like the Oompa Loompas were in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory to play the Munchkins.
I don't even need to mention that the movie will be in 3D.
$200 million easy! After all, people are stupid.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jack Theakston
Master Film Handler
Posts: 411
From: New York, USA
Registered: Sep 2007
|
posted 03-11-2010 12:31 AM
No way, Brad! The new franchise is going to be a trilogy directed by Christopher Nolan with a script by Frank Miller. The film will open in Gritty 1930s Downtown Wichita, where Dorothy Gale, a prostitute, considers committing suicide by jumping off the top of a building, but is swept up by a tornado and dropped in the land of Oz. But instead of a beautiful Technicolor Oz, the land of Munchkins is a seedy ghost town of grays and browns (because one staff writer once said, "that colorful stuff is so unrealistic!") Only the ruby slippers will be computer-colored red so that you remember you're not watching a black and white movie and get turned off.
Along the way, Dorothy meets the Scarecrow (Gary Oldman), who tries to rape her, but after she claws his face, is subdued into becoming her companion. The two stumble across the Tin Woodsman (Gerard Butler), a bounty hunter known for his bloodthirsty appetite. (Note: this scene will be great-- they first approach him from behind thinking he's frozen, but he turns around holding the severed head of a junkie munchkin who owes one of the crime syndicates in Oz money). Last along the line is the Cowardly Lion (Mickey Rourke), who is an ex-boxer afraid to enter the ring again...
et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
Home
Printer-friendly view of this topic