my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Are 35mm print runs decreasing?

Author Topic: Are 35mm print runs decreasing? Steven J Hart Master Film Handler Posts: 282 From: WALES, ND, USA Registered: Mar 2004 posted 10-21-2010 08:43 PM                        With the DC "rollout" going strong, anyone got any insight? •Are less 35mm prints being made? (than a year ago) •Are the labs laying off employees? •Are the distributors making more money because they have less prints to buy?  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 10-21-2010 08:51 PM                     yes yes no  |  IP: Logged Tom Petrov Five Guys Lover Posts: 1121 From: El Paso, TX Registered: Jan 2003 posted 10-21-2010 09:35 PM                    quote: •Are less 35mm prints being made? (than a year ago) I csn't see how they can be making the same or more. In the last year in my area, we have had 12 digital screens added which has replaced existing film screens. We just had two added to the Jackson Sqaure in Hamilton while 10 films screens were deleted at the Upper James which were replace with 9 Digital Screens close by. quote: •Are the labs laying off employees? They are not doing well. quote: •Are the distributors making more money because they have less prints to buy? For sure. Deluxe/Technicolour join forces  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 10-21-2010 09:38 PM                        The digital prints cost significantly more than the film prints plus then you have the code-key fees and the VPF. Louis  |  IP: Logged Tom Petrov Five Guys Lover Posts: 1121 From: El Paso, TX Registered: Jan 2003 posted 10-21-2010 10:17 PM                    quote: Louis Bornwasser The digital prints cost significantly more than the film prints plus then you have the code-key fees and the VPF. Louis I find this very hard to believe. With printing, shipping, make-ups, threading, break downs, trailing adding, shipping agian...I find it very hard to believe that a digital hard drive would cost more.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 10-21-2010 10:40 PM                     I actually discussed this with a rep of Deluxe at ShowEast...there are indeed a SLIGHT decrease in print runs in 2010 as compared to 2011. But as a percentage it isn't the kind of thing that would layoff anyone at the moment...at this point is merely a trend line. Steve  |  IP: Logged Anslem Rayburn Master Film Handler Posts: 476 From: Yuma, AZ, USA Registered: May 2002 posted 10-22-2010 05:03 AM                     quote: Steve Guttag there are indeed a SLIGHT decrease in print runs in 2010 as compared to 2011. You do mean compared to 2009, right?  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 10-22-2010 06:26 AM                     Yes...I mean compared to 2009. And by slight I mean I think it was on the order of 1% less...what it appears to be is the beginning of a trend.  |  IP: Logged Joshua Waaland Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 800 From: Cleveland, Ohio Registered: Dec 1999 posted 10-22-2010 08:02 AM                     Is it possible that many theaters are still getting 35mm prints for a back-up to the digital projector? I know I have heard that many theaters are keeping their 35mm projectors installed right next to their digital projectors for "just in case".  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 10-22-2010 08:09 AM                        Tom: no, I'm talking about the raw cost of the print on the loading dock, ready to go. Louis  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 10-22-2010 08:47 AM                     I know of no theatre that gets a 35mm "backup" print. DCP is considered reliable enough not to need it. Most of our (cinema) installations HAVE kept their 35mm projectors for flexibility reasons. If, they only have one DCinema screen and they don't think the next picture digital will be THAT big, they have the option of booking in 35mm so that the Digital movie does not get stuck in the big theatre for 6-weeks when it will barely do business for 1. I have generally advised that if you only have one Digital system, and you don't have multiple large auditoriums of similar size, to put the Digital system in a MEDIUM sized theatre. Yes, it will sell out on opening week but you also wont tie up the biggest auditorium on what will be a dead feature 3-weeks into the run when the latest 2-week wonder movie comes out. Once you have multiple DCinema systems, then you can put one in the large and medium sized theatres since you have the ability to start moving the titles down in size like you presently do with film. Steve  |  IP: Logged Mark J. Marshall Film God Posts: 3188 From: New Castle, DE, USA Registered: Aug 2002 posted 10-22-2010 12:24 PM                    Hopefully the prints they are still making will start to improve in quality if they're making less of them.  |  IP: Logged Richard Hamilton Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1341 From: Evansville, Indiana Registered: Jan 2000 posted 10-22-2010 02:08 PM                     Steve Your post reminds me of the first theater I worked at in the mid 80's. They had a Century JJ and would only book certain 70MM films in that house. That house was about 500 seats. The next house was less than half the size. They couldn't move the print, only get a 35 MM print when they needed to play it in another house and pay for the 35 print. Rick  |  IP: Logged John Wilson Film God Posts: 5438 From: Sydney, Australia. Registered: Dec 1999 posted 10-22-2010 06:03 PM                     We were allowed a back-up print for 'BOLT' when we installed our first DLP projector. I never ran the 35mm and it left brand new. I don't know of any distributor who supplies a standby 35 anymore...at least in Australia, but I would assume it to be the same elsewhere. That time is past. quote: Mark J. Marshall Hopefully the prints they are still making will start to improve in quality if they're making less of them I doubt that will happen. The labs will just lose staff. I agree prints are shitty now though. Our Paranormal Activity 2 moves about like it's having a dance all the way through completely destroying the intended 'video' look. Pull the plate out though and see the sprockets are steady as can be. Sucky indeed.  |  IP: Logged Joe Redifer You need a beating today Posts: 12859 From: Denver, Colorado Registered: May 99 posted 10-22-2010 08:31 PM                        No, John, that's just because Paranormal Activity 2 was shot on a VHS-C camcorder and the person holding it has Parkinsons*. *©1991-2010 Michael J. Fox  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.