|
|
Author
|
Topic: Neon and Argon/mercury cold cathode tubes.
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God
Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 04-18-2011 06:34 PM
Tony,
Thank you for that, there's some interesting and useful information there, but it doesn't answer the length problem, partly because it deals only with high frequency supplies rather than conventional transformers, and also because it deals only with high-Voltage.
I'm not sure what effect, if any, using a high frequency would have on the maximum tube. If length is proportional to Voltage, which I think it is for this type of discharge, then the length which I'm looking at would be close to the limit with 980V low Voltage. If the tubing was in a single length it would probably work,but with two tubes is series, with two extra electrodes in the circuit it might be too much.
I have to use two separate tubes as one needs to be deep red, neon in ruby red clear glass, and the other an intense white, argon/mercury in white phosphor coated glass. Neon has a greater Voltage drop for a given length than argon/mercury has.
This is a picture of two very short lengths of tube, about a foot long, lit experimentally on the low Voltage transformer. One is neon, and the other argon/mercury, both in clear uncoated glass. I don't have any longer tubes of the right diameter to hand that I can experiment with at the moment. The two small mercury lamps are simply propping up the tubes to keep the hot ends clear of my bed which they are resting on.
One advantage of low Voltage is that there is very little risk of arcing; the longest arc you can get with this transformer is about half a mm, and in this picture the connections to the transformer are uninsulated. Low Voltage also allows the use of thinner, more flexible cable. While there's little risk of an arc I would still take care not to touch it; it can source 40 mA, which is more than I would want going through me.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God
Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 04-19-2011 01:57 AM
quote: Bobby Henderson It doesn't look like the transformer you have was specifically designed to power neon. The secondary voltage isn't high enough to power more than perhaps 4 or 5 feet of tubing. But that might be enough length for what you're wanting to do. If the transformer is fairly new it may be of the ground fault variety. If the transformer can't handle the load it will trip. The way the neon is wired can also cause the transformer to trip.
It's designed to power cold cathode lighting in various applications, though probably not generally for sign tubing; as you say, the Voltage would be too low in most cases. These transformers are quite common, they're available from several manufacturers, though most have a slightly higher Voltage, 990 or 995 V for example; there are advantages to using a device which is just low enough to be classed as low Voltage.
Very thin tubes of this type are used for lighting edge lit Perspex signs for example, and I've even seen slightly thicker ones used in photocopiers in the past; these sort of applications only need short tubes of course.
The transformer that I have only cost me ten pounds; it was unused surplus stock, and I think is the type which is used to light bus shelters in Derby, where the man I bought it from is based. I've seen one of the tubes which he makes for this, they're probably 20 mm in diameter, and about five feet long, bent into a 'U' shape and with the electrodes mounted straight on the tube, no need for light right to the ends of the tube, and screw terminals on the ends. They use them in this application due to the long life, but I think that they are now being replaced by conventional fluorescents when they fail.
quote: Bobby Henderson LEDs are quickly replacing neon in a lot of border lighting situations. But there really is no substitute for neon when it comes to things like channel letters with exposed glass tubes. Only old fashioned neon can do that look.
Seems to have almost totally replaced neon in things like 'Open' signs in shop windows, and I've also seen it used in channel letters. One building which I pass on the bus going to work had some 'mock neon', LEDs in plastic tube, installed along the roof line a couple of years ago; it only lasted a few months. The shop window signs often have failed sections in them. London Bridge station on the London Underground has an area at the top of the escalators lit by downlighters which use about 50 large LEDs rather than the conventional CFL tubes; again, many of these seem to have failed, and I've not been very impressed by the very few LED streetlamps which I've seen so far. They're getting better, but I don't think they're there yet.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|