|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: Verizon Sucks!
|
|
|
|
|
Monte L Fullmer
Film God
Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004
|
posted 08-18-2011 10:56 PM
"Dom", sounds like your issues are with the phone itself, not the network .. along with a very poor store manager. Did you head to another Verizon store to get another opinion or help?
Also, you have to realize that those fancy phones are like mini computers that does eat battery current on a rather steady basis. My daughter had one of them "curves" and that thing was on the charger more than it was in her purse since she left it on all the time-in standby mode. She finally dumped the thing and went more simpler - a flip phone - and now, she can keep that thing off the charger more.
I used to have Verizon via my former employer since they issued company celphones and had excellent service. Then when I left, I had to go on my own since I lost that fone.
Thus, went to Tracfone since I didn't want to lock up my life for two years with those contracts, since I don't need that smartfone stuff - I'm just a talk and text sort of guy - (and they use AT&T as their service provider..) and had great service, but with Tracfone's plan along with my increase of minutes and texting, my celphone bill was getting rather on the expensive side.
Thus, let Tracfone go and went with another "pay as you go" service with iWireless, which has a great plan for a set amount per month for talk and text, but, they use the Sprint network..
I love the phone I have now with iWireless, but using Sprint is a bad idea, for I've dropped calls, lost signals, gone into roaming service within one room and other abnormalities of a crappy server.
I'm gonna wade this one out some more then decide what to do next - maybe head to Tracfone's other company - Straight Talk since they have plans that closely matches this one I have with iWireless...which, also uses the AT&T network....but have to wait and see for now.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 08-19-2011 11:39 AM
quote: Brad Miller AT&T. That's saying enough. I've been thrilled with my Verizon service for internet and cell phone. AT&T has been nothing but a screw job for me.
My girlfriend has had exactly the same experience with them, with a slow and sometimes non-existent DSL internet service. AT&T are the only provider offering DSL service in her neighbourhood (just outside San Bernadino), and so unless she gets cable broadband, she's stuck with them. The speed is claimed to be 2mbps, but yet has never gone above 0.7 when I've been there. When she phones AT&T's helpline, she is instructed to run their own speed test page. Surprise surprise, it says that she's getting the full speed (which, from her home to AT&T's data centre I'm sure she is, but from there to the server of the website she's trying to look at is a totally different story), the guy on the phone says "Well, you're getting what you're paying for, Ma'am" and starts reading his script telling her to check for Windows issues. However, run an independent (i.e. not run by AT&T) speed test page, and 70kb/s is the absolute maximum. Furthermore, the service frequently freezes totally for minutes on end, especially on weekday evening peak times. And we know that the problem isn't her computer, because that's the top speed my laptop gets, too, when I'm staying with her - running both the Windows and Ubuntu partitions.
As Bobby points out, I'm sure it's the monopoly syndrome. AT&T know that the only way she can get a better service in her current location is by buying cable TV with it as well, which she doesn't want; and so effectively she's stuck with them.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God
Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 08-20-2011 06:11 AM
My experience with Blackberry has not been good. We started off with a few senior management having them, and this eventually increased to about 50. Eventually I was given an old one as I look after the telephone system, and they thought that I should support the Blackberries as well. I don't actually use it, it's just for testing purposes, and can be loaned out to a member of staff if their Blackberry fails, which they seem to do frequently.
The battery life is poor, mine will just about do a working day on standby without being used for calls, and the battery now in it is less than a year old. Falling a metre off a desk onto a wooden floor is often enough to kill them totally, the mini-trackballs are unreliable, though I don't think the newer models have them. The same applies to the similar balls on Apple mice. The Blackberry Enterprise Server is also troublesome; it often just stops working for no obvious reason, and is not very happy working with Exchange 2010.
The Blackberry was a good idea when it came out, much easier to handle mail than conventional 'phones, but there are other options now.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|