Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Ebert Concedes Defeat on Digital (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Ebert Concedes Defeat on Digital
Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-03-2011 11:41 AM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011/11/the_sudden_death_of_film.html?mid=51

quote:
But my war is over, my side lost, and it's important to consider this in the real world.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-03-2011 03:29 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm surprised he didn't use that article to launch another long rant against 3D. He confined anti-3D sentiments to one sentence.

He's right in a way, but for 99% of people, going to the movies is about seeing a picture on a screen, not about how it gets there. I think if you REALLY love a movie, you get lost in it and eventually the method of presentation is forgotten. I know the first time I ever saw a digital movie I was all curious and fascinated by the projection, but within 10 minutes I was into the story and not even thinking about how the picture was getting there.

 |  IP: Logged

David M. Leugers
Film Handler

Posts: 43
From: Fairfield, Ohio, united States of America
Registered: Jan 2005


 - posted 11-03-2011 06:27 PM      Profile for David M. Leugers   Email David M. Leugers   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sadly the experience is not the same for people like me. I am certainly not the only one, not even in my family. I don't know what words to use to adequately describe it because the effect seems so subtle but is very profound. Watching a digital film is a very transitory experience. The film leaves little imprint upon my memory and doesn't engage my emotions like a film projection of a movie shot on film. It is like my mind knows I am watching a big TV show and goes into coach potato mode. The attendance at all the remaining theaters near me are way down, no matter what the dollar figures are saying. Unless everyone is car pooling... Even my grown kids in their 20's are not going to see films in a theater. I believe the reason is for the first time in the history of film, exhibitors and Hollywood are giving the audiences something technically not as good as before.
And everyone can get what is being offered in other venues, even on their cell phone. I wish them luck, but I think they have created the perfect storm to kill off theaters. I hope I am wrong.

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 11-03-2011 06:37 PM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I admittedly haven't seen many digital presentations, but I did see the screen door effect on two of them. If that's the best digital can do, it isn't good enough.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-03-2011 07:01 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: David M. Leugers
It is like my mind knows I am watching a big TV show
I would think your mind would know it's not TV by the fact that there's no "bugs" in the bottom corners of the screen, or no commercials interrupting the show, or the fact that the picture is 50 feet wide, etc. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 11-03-2011 08:06 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jesse Skeen
but I did see the screen door effect on two of them
.. definitely weren't DLP/LCoS presentations then, for that definitely the old school, three lens stuff.

 |  IP: Logged

David M. Leugers
Film Handler

Posts: 43
From: Fairfield, Ohio, united States of America
Registered: Jan 2005


 - posted 11-03-2011 09:14 PM      Profile for David M. Leugers   Email David M. Leugers   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I would think your mind would know it's not TV by the fact that there's no "bugs" in the bottom corners of the screen, or no commercials interrupting the show, or the fact that the picture is 50 feet wide, etc. [Smile]
Yeah and who are these strangers, and this is not my room, and that is not my beautiful wife, this not my wonderful life... letting the days go by....same as it ever was, same as it ever was. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-03-2011 09:59 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Na na na, Monty -- CRT three gun technology did NOT suffer from screen door effect; that was purely the LCD technology that us that nasty video artifax. The old three tube systems may have had a number of anomolies that would let you know you weren't watching film, but screen-door effect wasn't one of them.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 11-03-2011 10:44 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
that's what it was, Frank .. that LCD stuff .. forgot about them..thx for the correction.

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Petrov
Five Guys Lover

Posts: 1121
From: El Paso, TX
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 11-04-2011 11:45 PM      Profile for Tom Petrov     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am glad Ebert finally admitted thast film is done. He also did the correct thing by stating that 70mm is no longer "viable" according to the studios. He also mentions watching movies online which is very telling.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert E. Allen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1078
From: Checotah, Oklahoma
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 11-05-2011 12:52 AM      Profile for Robert E. Allen   Email Robert E. Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Tom Petrov
I am glad Ebert finally admitted thast film is done. He also did the correct thing by stating that 70mm is no longer "viable" according to the studios. He also mentions watching movies online which is very telling.
Now Tom, why does that make you feel better? Is it a "score one for my generation" thing? Remember, there are still thousands of theatres around the world running film.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 11-05-2011 01:10 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tom is just being an anti-film troll to annoy some of the long time participants in this forum. Hooray for taking steps backward only because the new thing is different (but not better).

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Petrov
Five Guys Lover

Posts: 1121
From: El Paso, TX
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 11-05-2011 01:23 AM      Profile for Tom Petrov     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Robert E. Allen
Now Tom, why does that make you feel better? Is it a "score one for my generation" thing? Remember, there are still thousands of theatres around the world running film.
Doesn't make me feel better, just makes me think Ebert finally gets it. It took me awhile to finally accept that film was done, I am glad he does as well.

Its significant that he now admits that most movies that he watches are digital. He also admits that he watches many of his movies off Netflix etc.

quote: Bobby Henderson
(but not better)
Yes Bobby, correct, he admits that 70mm might be better, but he also admits that it is no longer viable

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 11-05-2011 01:45 AM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tom is as clueless as he is crass.

Perhaps it has not dawned on him that Roger Ebert has significant health issues that prevent him from getting around as before?

If Karma ever gets him, he'll be watching movies on some old CRT TV in the activities room of a low-rent assisted living facility with Nurse Rachet (sp) as the day nurse.

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Petrov
Five Guys Lover

Posts: 1121
From: El Paso, TX
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 11-05-2011 01:48 AM      Profile for Tom Petrov     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sam, please read the article, he mentions nothing about his health issues affecting his movie watching habits.

In fact, he says

For me, seeing a movie in a real theater with a real audience is an inescapable part of the experience. I watch as many movies on TV as most people, and they're okay that way, but when a movie is on fire I want to sense the audience burning.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.