my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » What's the deal with Fox and these Scrat "shorts?"

Author Topic: What's the deal with Fox and these Scrat "shorts?" Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 12-18-2011 08:48 PM                        Is it just me, or are others annoyed that Fox is taking bits out of the upcoming Ice Age movie, disguising them as "shorts" and attaching them to their family flicks? I was thinking the "Continental Crack-Up" thing was an independent short until it was attached to at least 2 different movies. Now with "Alvin 3" we have "Continental Crack-Up Part 2" which has some of the other Ice Age characters and is clearly just a lift from the upcoming film. A scene from the "short" is even featured on the teaser one-sheet. They're not shorts, they're trailers. They ought to be labeled as such and separate from the feature. If Fox wants to make shorts like Disney and WB do, they should make real shorts and not these disguised trailers.  |  IP: Logged Justin Hamaker Film God Posts: 2253 From: Lakeport, CA USA Registered: Jan 2004 posted 12-18-2011 09:16 PM                        I think they have done this with the previous movies as well. And the Scrat bits have always been more or less independent of the movie's plot. Given how the average trailer gives away the entire story of a movie, I'm not really concerned about these "shorts".  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 12-19-2011 04:21 AM                        Ruin a movie that filmmakers worked a year or two of their lives on....you think that bothers these people? They would sell their grandmother into the sex slave trade if they thought they could get a good advance and a bump in percentage on her.  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 12-19-2011 11:43 AM                        They should make some Scrat shorts that are not included in the subsequent movie. The way they're doing it, anyone who's seen the "trailers" will feel a slight bit ripped off since the bits are lifted wholesale from the movie. You can argue that ALL trailers are lifted from the finished movie, but not three or four minutes of continuous footage. The other problem is, they are seriously running out of humorous Scrat ideas. This newest one is the least enjoyable of them all, I think. Chuck Jones, Treg Brown and Michael Maltese had more imagination in their little fingers than these guys do.  |  IP: Logged Justin Hamaker Film God Posts: 2253 From: Lakeport, CA USA Registered: Jan 2004 posted 12-19-2011 02:10 PM                        quote: Mike Blakesley The other problem is, they are seriously running out of humorous Scrat ideas. This newest one is the least enjoyable of them all, I think No disagreement there. The whole continental crack-up thing amounts to about 6 minutes of Scrat screaming and trying to get the damn acorn. In my opinion, it actually hurts the movie's potential because I have no interest in seeing it again.  |  IP: Logged Robert Harrison Expert Film Handler Posts: 239 From: Harwood Heights, Illinois, USA Registered: Jun 2005 posted 12-25-2011 11:05 AM                     Well, it's one thing to put it on a short movie like "Chipwrecked." But what were they thinking including it on a 2 hour movie like "We Bought a Zoo?"  |  IP: Logged Justin Hamaker Film God Posts: 2253 From: Lakeport, CA USA Registered: Jan 2004 posted 02-14-2012 05:51 PM                        It seems that Fox is now going to attach the Scrat short to everything they release between now and July 13. It was on Star Wars last week and they have it on This Means War this week.  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-14-2012 07:53 PM                        That's just ridiculous. They're treating it like a real short, but it's a freaking TRAILER which means it shouldn't be attached to the movie file.  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 02-14-2012 10:38 PM                     Will Fox re-encode the DCPs for future repertory bookings??? After all, it can't be removed from the feature.  |  IP: Logged Jock Blakley Expert Film Handler Posts: 218 From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Registered: Oct 2011 posted 02-14-2012 10:49 PM                     Hah, I'll believe that when I see it. Paramount send out the Grease sing-a-long DCP with a "GREASE SING-A-LONG NOT PLAYING IN YOUR TOWN?" ad at the head *AND* tail of the feature. (anybody care to explain to me the point of advertising a particular feature by attaching the trailer to the feature in question?)  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 02-14-2012 11:00 PM                     ... major overkill ...  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 02-14-2012 11:24 PM                     Was it PART of the feature DCP file, or was it simply included on the drive as a separate trailer? Your post makes me think it was actually attached, but that is just such a stupid idea I refuse to believe Paramount actually did that, hence my request for a clarification.  |  IP: Logged Jock Blakley Expert Film Handler Posts: 218 From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Registered: Oct 2011 posted 02-15-2012 06:57 AM                     Oh you're more than right to want to clarify that... but what I said is what I meant to say: the ad for the film is the first sixteen seconds of the FEATURE DCP. It is then REPEATED at the END of the same feature DCP, after the credits and Paramount logo.  |  IP: Logged Dominic Espinosa Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1172 From: California, U.S.A. Registered: Jan 2004 posted 02-25-2012 02:37 PM                     quote: Mike Blakesley Chuck Jones, Treg Brown and Michael Maltese had more imagination in their little fingers than these guys do. AMEN. I love me some squirrel based humor. How about some Rocky and Bullwinkle shorts while we're at it? There is also a simple solution to this problem. Edit the CPL so the entry point on the first reel is beyond the short and then repack the PKL (Probably not a good idea in practice)  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-27-2012 11:14 AM                        If I had a clue how to do that, I would. I also don't like (on the Star Wars movie) how there is only about a half-second between the end of Scrat and the 20th logo.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.