|
|
Author
|
Topic: Y Combinator Wants To Kill Hollywood
|
Frank Cox
Film God
Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011
|
posted 01-21-2012 12:13 PM
Y Combinator, a firm that invests in startups, has put out a call to kill Hollywood.
Kill Hollywood
quote:
RFS 9: Kill Hollywood
Hollywood appears to have peaked. If it were an ordinary industry (film cameras, say, or typewriters), it could look forward to a couple decades of peaceful decline. But this is not an ordinary industry. The people who run it are so mean and so politically connected that they could do a lot of damage to civil liberties and the world economy on the way down. It would therefore be a good thing if competitors hastened their demise.
That's one reason we want to fund startups that will compete with movies and TV, but not the main reason. The main reason we want to fund such startups is not to protect the world from more SOPAs, but because SOPA brought it to our attention that Hollywood is dying. They must be dying if they're resorting to such tactics. If movies and TV were growing rapidly, that growth would take up all their attention. When a striker is fouled in the penalty area, he doesn't stop as long as he still has control of the ball; it's only when he's beaten that he turns to appeal to the ref. SOPA shows Hollywood is beaten. And yet the audiences to be captured from movies and TV are still huge. There is a lot of potential energy to be liberated there.
How do you kill the movie and TV industries? Or more precisely (since at this level, technological progress is probably predetermined) what is going to kill them? Mostly not what they like to believe is killing them, filesharing. What's going to kill movies and TV is what's already killing them: better ways to entertain people. So the best way to approach this problem is to ask yourself: what are people going to do for fun in 20 years instead of what they do now?
There will be several answers, ranging from new ways to produce and distribute shows, through new media (e.g. games) that look a lot like shows but are more interactive, to things (e.g. social sites and apps) that have little in common with movies and TV except competing with them for finite audience attention. Some of the best ideas may initially look like they're serving the movie and TV industries. Microsoft seemed like a technology supplier to IBM before eating their lunch, and Google did the same thing to Yahoo.
It would be great if what people did instead of watching shows was exercise more and spend more time with their friends and families. Maybe they will. All other things being equal, we'd prefer to hear about ideas like that. But all other things are decidedly not equal. Whatever people are going to do for fun in 20 years is probably predetermined. Winning is more a matter of discovering it than making it happen. In this respect at least, you can't push history off its course. You can, however, accelerate it.
What's the most entertaining thing you can build?
| IP: Logged
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."
Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 01-21-2012 06:40 PM
If anything is going to kill Hollywood it will be Hollywood itself. And they're well on the way of doing that. Too many of their movies are "been there done that" derivative. They've outsourced a great deal of movie and TV production to Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, Australia, etc. They're undermining the ability of commercial movie theaters to be profitable and continue providing the primary showcase and marketing tool for their movies.
Regarding the backlash about SOPA and PIPA, I really wonder if the list of industries pushing that legislation begins and ends with the movie and music industry.
I haven't seen much in terms of pro/con views about SOPA and PIPA from representatives of the computing software industry. And I think the software guys are losing a lot more money from pirated applications than Hollywood is losing from pirated movies.
And what about the porn industry? Where do they stand on SOPA and PIPA? Their business has been damaged pretty seriously by several overseas YouTube-like video streaming web sites offering up hardcore content for nothing. It would seem like SOPA would put a quick end to that.
I don't see the "Y Combinator" thing going anywhere. What Hollywood has between movie theaters, home video, TV networks, etc. nearly amounts to a vertical monopoly of sorts. An outside start up has little chance of getting enough movie theater bookings, video store shelf space and TV network time to make a dent in Hollywood's dominance. The only real threat to Hollywood is its customers. If the viewers get bored enough by the same old shit then it might open a door or two for competitors. Or it might grow the video gaming and social networking businesses. Or it might increase enrollments in health clubs.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|